oa Definiteness and reflexivity

References

1. Burton-Roberts, Noel
   (1989) The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chafe, Wallace
   (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-55.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chafe, Wallace
   (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Christophersen, Paul
   (1939) The Articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Herbert H
   (1977) Bridging. In P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason (eds.), Thinking. Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411-420.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Haviland
   (1977) Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. In Roy O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablexpp. 1-40.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Herbert H. and Catherine R. Marshall
   (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi , Bonnie L. Webber and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10-63.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DuBois, John W
   (1980) Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cultural, cognitive and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 203-274.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DuBois, John W
   (2000) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. [www.ldc.upenn.edu/Publications/SBC/]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Du Bois, John W. , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Danae Paolino and Susanna Cumming
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane E. Edwards and Martin D. Lambert (eds.), Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Donnellan, Keith
    (1971) Reference and definite descriptions. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100-114.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Erkü, Feride and Jeanette K. Gundel
    (1987) The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertucelli-Papi (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 533-545. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.39erk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.39erk [Google Scholar]
13. Epstein, Richard
    (1999) Roles, Frames and Definiteness. In Karen van Hoek , Andrej A. Kibrik , and Leo Noordman (eds.), Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 53-74. doi: 10.1075/cilt.176.05eps
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.176.05eps [Google Scholar]
14. Fauconnier, Gilles
    (1985) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fauconnier, Gilles
    (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
16. Fillmore, Charles J
    (1982) Frame Semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm . Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 111-137.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fox, Barbara
    (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
18. Frege, Gottlob
    (1892) Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeischrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik. 100: 22-50. Also in P.T. Geach and M. Black. 1952. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 56-78.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gundel, Jeanette K. , Nancy Hedberg , and Ron Zacharski
    (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language69: 274-307. doi: 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
20. Goffman, Erving
    (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hawkins, John A
    (1978) Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Heim, Irene
    (1983) File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness. In Rainer Bäuerle , Christopher Schwartze and Armin von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation in Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 164-189.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hintikka, Jaakko and Lauri Carlson
    (1977) Pronouns of laziness in game-theoretical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 4(1/2): 1-29. doi: 10.1515/thli.1977.4.1‑3.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1977.4.1-3.1 [Google Scholar]
24. Karttunen, Lauri
    (1976) Discourse referents. In James D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. New York: Academic Press, pp. 363-385.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lambrecht, Knud
    (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
26. Laury, Ritva
    (1997) Demonstratives in Interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7 [Google Scholar]
27. Laury, Ritva
    (2001) Definiteness. In Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola sstman , Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1999 installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lyons, Christopher
    (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
29. Marmaridou, Sophia S.A
    (2000) Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.72 [Google Scholar]
30. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (1999) Situated politeness: Competing concerns about the use of honorifics in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics9.1: 51-74.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Partee, Barbara Hall
    (1972) Opacity, coreference and pronouns. In Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 415-441. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2557‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_13 [Google Scholar]
32. Pekarek, Simona
    (1998) Deixis and the interactional construction of context. In: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 5.1: 127-138.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Prince, Ellen
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-255.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Russell, Bertrand
    (1905) On denoting. Mind14: 479-493. doi: 10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479 [Google Scholar]
35. Sakahara, Shigeru
    (1996) Roles and identificational copular sentences. In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 262-289.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sbis B, Marina
    (1999) Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In Jef Verschueren (ed.), Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. I. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, pp. 495-509.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
    (1998) Läsnäolon pronominit. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Silverstein, Michael
    (1981) The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Papers84. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Lab.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Strawson, Peter F
    (1950) On referring. Mind59: 320-344. doi: 10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 [Google Scholar]
40. Vilkuna, Maria
    (1992) Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa. [Reference and definiteness in the interpretation of Finnish-language texts]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]