Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Two interviews by Christiane Amanpour televized September 8, 2000 on CNN, one with Ehud Barak and one with Yasser Arafat were analyzed for indicators of personal perspective. Generally, use of the same indicators as in Suleiman, O’Connell, & Kowal (2002) was confirmed: Number of syllables spoken; use of first-person singular and plural pronominals and second-person pronominals; hesitations; smooth and interruptive turn transitions; and questions posed by interviewees. The interview with Arafat was extraordinarily agonistic, as manifested in his excessive use of first-person singular and second-person pronominals, hesitations, questions, and interruptions. For her part, Amanpour incited the shift to agonism with her provocative questioning. She then moved toward a more personal perspective by speaking proportionally more and by using more first-person singular pronominals and hesitations, all the while still maintaining her professional style of smooth turn transition. The dialogical character of personal perspective is discussed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N
    (2001) The discourse of medical encounters. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen , & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 453-469.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, M
    (1981) The dialogical imagination: Four essays (trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist ; ed. M. Holquist ). Austin, TX: Texas University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D. , S. Conrad , & R. Reppen
    (1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chilton, P. , & C. Schaffner
    (1997) Discourse and politics. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2). London: Sage, pp. 206-230.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, H.H
    (1994) Discourse in production. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 985-1021.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clayman, S. , & J. Heritage
    (2002) The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Fina, A
    (1995) Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text15: 379-410.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Der Tagesspiegel
    (2002) Zurechtweisung vom General. (March31 2002: 5).
  10. Farr, R.M
    (1984) Interviewing: An introduction to the social psychology of the interview. In C.I. Cooper & P. Makin (eds.), Psychology for managers (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan, pp. 176-194.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Garrod, S. , & M.J. Pickering
    (1999) Issues in language processing. In S. Garrod & M.J. Pickering (eds.), Language processing. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 1-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Goffman, E
    (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1967) Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Graumann, C
    (1989) Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (eds.), Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 95-122. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑87144‑2.50007‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-87144-2.50007-0 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harre, R
    (2001) The discursive turn in social psychology. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen , & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 608-706.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holtgraves, T.M
    (2002) Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. James, W
    (1890/1983) The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kowal, S. , H.-C. Barth , H. Egemann , G. Gasulic , C. Kogel , N. Lippold , A. Pfeil , & D.C. O'Connell
    (1998) Unterbrechungen in Medieninterviews: Geschlechtstypisches Gesprachsverhalten?Germanistische Linguistik139-140: 279-299.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kowal, S. , & D.C. O'Connell
    (1997) Theoretical ideals and their violation: Princess Diana and Martin Bashir in the BBC interview. Pragmatics7: 309-323.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2002) Interjektionen im Gesprach. Zeitschrift fur Semiotik 24: xx-xx.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, R
    (1975) Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, S
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Linell, P
    (1998) Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maitland, K. , & G. Wilson
    (1987) Ideological conflict and pronominal resolution. Journal of Pragmatics11:495-512. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90092‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90092-0 [Google Scholar]
  26. O'Connell, D.C. , & S. Kowal
    (1998) Orality and literacy in public discourse: An interview of Hannah Arendt. Journal of Pragmatics30: 543-564. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00034‑4
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00034-4 [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Connell, D.C. , S. Kowal , & E.J. Dill III
    (in press) A Dialogical Approach to TV News Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics34.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rommetveit, R
    (l974)On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 83-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schiffrin, D
    (1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schiffrin, D. , D. Tannen , & H. Hamilton
    (eds.) (2001) The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Suleiman, C
    (1999) Pronouns and self presentation in public discourse: Yasser Arafat as case study. In Yasir Suleiman (ed.), Language and society in the Middle East and North Africa: Studies in variation and identity. London: Curzon, pp. 104-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2000)  Pronoun use in television interviews: Social interaction and the Middle East peace process . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  34. Suleiman, C. , D.C. O'Connell , & S. Kowal
    (2002) "If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire...";Perspective in political interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research31:281-299.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Urban, G
    (1988) The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua7: 67-93. doi: 10.1515/mult.1988.7.1‑2.67
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mult.1988.7.1-2.67 [Google Scholar]
  36. van Langenhove, L
    ., & R. Harre (l993) Positioning and autobiography: Telling your life. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (eds.) Discourse and life-span development (Vol. 4). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 81-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary (l983) Springfield, MA: A Meriam-Webster.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilson, J
    (2001) Political discourse. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen , & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 398-415.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dialogue; Perspective; TV news interviews
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error