Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This article examines the distribution of relationships of power and authority as an activity in gossip sessions among members of a community in Pohnpei, Micronesia. The position of Bourdieu, that the interactionist approach cannot elucidate important aspects of the sharing of power in society, is used as a starting place to examine ways in which interactants in everyday conversations manipulate and organize gendered identities and the entitlements of certain classes of individuals to particular types of power.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila
    (1986) Veiled sentiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergmann, J
    (1993) Discrete indiscretions. The social organization of gossip. New York: Aldine / de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Besnier, Niko
    (1990) Conflict management, gossip and affective meaning on Nukulaelae. In K. Watson-Gegeo , and G. White (eds.), Disentangling: Conflict discourse in the Pacific. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 290-334.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Billig, Michael
    (1999) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and society 10.4: 543-558. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010004005
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogen, David , and Michael Lynch
    (1990) Social critique and the logic of description. Journal of Pragmatics14: 505-521. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90109‑Q
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90109-Q [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1990) The logic of practice. Richard Nice trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1994) Language and symbolic power. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Briggs, Charles
    (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and social inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brison, Karen
    (1992) Just talk. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520077003.001.0001
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520077003.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brenneis, Donald
    (1984) Grog and gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and substance in Fiji Indian conversation. American Ethnologist11: 3. doi: 10.1525/ae.1984.11.3.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1984.11.3.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  12. Briggs, Charles
    (ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and social inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, D
    (1997) Performing gender identity: Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Sally Johnson , and Ulrike Meinhof (eds.), Language and masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Elias, N
    (1994) [1939] The Civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckert, P. , and S. McConnell-Ginet
    (1995) Constructing meaning, constructing selves. In K. Hall , and M. Bucholz (eds.), Gender Articulated. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Marjorie
    (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, Charles , and Marjorie Goodwin
    (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IprA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1: 1-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanks, William F
    (1996) Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haviland, John
    (1977) Gossip, reputation, and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heritage, John
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenkins, Richard
    (1992) Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Keating, Elizabeth
    (1998) Power sharing: Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kihleng, Kimberly
    (1996) Women in exchange: Negotiated relations, practice, and the constitution of female power in processes of cultural reproduction and change in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii. (UMI No. 9700526)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kotthoff, Helga , & R. Wodak
    (eds.) (1997) Communicating gender in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.42
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.42 [Google Scholar]
  26. Labov, William
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lynch, Michael
    (1999) Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory. Human Studies22: 211-233. doi: 10.1023/A:1005440501638
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mauricio, Rufino
    (1993) Ideological bases for power and leadership on Pohnpei, Micronesia: Perspectives from Archaeology and Oral History. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon (UMI # 9402036).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McHoul, Alec
    (1988) Language and the sociology of mind: A critical introduction to the work of Jeff Coulter. Journal of Pragmatics12: 339-386. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90037‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90037-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pollner, Melvin
    (1991) Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review56: 370-380. doi: 10.2307/2096110
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2096110 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reisenberg, Saul
    (1968) The native polity of Ponape. Vol 10 of theSmithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sapir, Edward
    (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech.New York: Harcourt, Brace, Janovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emanuel
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70: 1075-95. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1998) Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society 9.3: 413-416. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003006
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003006 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1999) Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society 10.4: 577-582. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010004008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004008 [Google Scholar]
  37. Speer, Susan
    (2001) Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants’ orientations. Feminism and Psychology11.1: 107-135. doi: 10.1177/0959353501011001006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011001006 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, John
    (ed.) (1994) Editor’s introduction.In Pierre Bourdieu Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Titscher, S. , M. Meyer , R. Wodak , & R. Vetter
    (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysisTranslated by B. Jenner . London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wetherell, Margaret
    (1998) Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post- structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9.3: 387-412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Ethnomethodology; Gender; Gossip; Micronesia; Social inequality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error