1887
Volume 12, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

From a psychological point of view, this study looks at children’s and adult’s comprehension of idiomatic expressions, and most particularly at the underlying cognitive processes needed for comprehension. Idiomatic expressions are expressions where there is a considerable difference between what is said (literal interpretation) and what is meant (idiomatic interpretation). In other words, the meaning of an idiomatic expression depends largely on a convention that relates a given linguistic form to a given meaning. Conducted in this framework, the present study was aimed at determining the role of contextual characteristics and the linguistic convention in the comprehension of idiomatic expressions by 6- and 9-year-old children, and by adults. The subject’s task was to complete stories. Twelve stories were presented in comic strip format by the experimenter, who told the story in the first three frames and then instructed the subject to choose one of the two possible endings. Two features of the stories were varied : The utterance production context (idiomatic vs. literal) and the idiom familiarity level (familiar vs. unfamiliar). Regardless of age, the context had a substantial impact on idiom comprehension: This reinforces the idea of the necessity of taking the context and the extra-linguistic conventions into account in order to explain language functioning, not only in children but also in adults. The role of the linguistic convention began at the age of 9 and was particularly strong in adults: They appear to reconstruct the communication situation solely on the basis of the linguistic convention. The role of familiarity also appeared in the 9-year-olds and continued on into adulthood. These results suggest that the period of adolescence is crucial for the development of certain pragmatic aspects of language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.12.4.01lav
2002-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abkarian, G.G. , Alison Jones , and Gretchen West
    (1992) Young children's idiom comprehension: Trying to get the picture. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research35: 580-587. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3503.580
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.580 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman, Brian P
    (1982) On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology33: 439-454. doi: 10.1016/0022‑0965(82)90058‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90058-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernicot, Josie , and Virginie Laval
    (1996) Promises in French children: Comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics25: 101-122. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00075‑5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00075-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cacciari, Cristina , and Maria C. Levorato
    (1989) How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language16: 387-405. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900010473
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010473 [Google Scholar]
  5. Colston, Herbert L. , and Jennifer O'Brien
    (2000) Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1557-1583. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00110‑1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00110-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowie, Antony P
    (1998) Phraseology. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 673-677.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cronk, Brian C. , and Wendy A. Schweigert
    (1992) The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics13: 131-146. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400005531
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005531 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cronk, Brian C. , Susan D. Lima , and Wendy A. Schweigert
    (1993) Idioms in sentences: Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research22: 59-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01068157
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068157 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goatly, Andrew
    (1994) Register and the redemption of relevance theory: The case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4.2: 139-182.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbs, Raymond. W
    (1987) Linguistic factors in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language14: 569-586. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900010291
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010291 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbs, Raymond W
    (1991) Semantic analyzability in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research34: 613-620. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.613
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3403.613 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Gayle P. Gonzales
    (1985) Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition20: 243-259. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90010‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90010-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibbs, Raymond W. , Nandini P. Nayak , John L. Bolton , and Melissa E. Keppel
    (1989) Speakers' assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory and Cognition 17: 58-68. doi: 10.3758/BF03199557
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199557 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Nandini P. Nayak
    (1989) Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology21: 100-138. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90004‑2
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90004-2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Jessica F. Moise
    (1997) Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition62: 51-74. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00724‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00724-X [Google Scholar]
  16. Giora, Rachel , and Ofer Fein
    (1999) On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics31: 1601-1618. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00006‑5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Glucksberg, Sam
    (2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. London: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hickmann, Maya
    (2001) Language and cognition in development: Old questions, new directions. Pragmatics 11.2: 105-126.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Keysar, Boaz , and Bridget Martin Bly
    (1999) Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure?Journal of Pragmatics31: 1559-1578. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00004‑1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00004-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Laval, Virginie , and Josie Bernicot
    (1999) How French-speaking children understand promises: The role of future tense. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research28: 179-195. doi: 10.1023/A:1023262325889
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023262325889 [Google Scholar]
  21. Levorato, Maria C. , and Cristina Cacciari
    (1992) Children's comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language19: 415-433. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900011478
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011478 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1995) The effect of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology60: 261-283. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1041
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1041 [Google Scholar]
  23. (1999) Idiom comprehension in children: Are the effects of semantic analyzability and context separable?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology60: 261-283. doi: 10.1080/713752299
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713752299 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mueller, R. , and Raymond W. Gibbs
    (1987) Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16: 63-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ninio, Anat , and Catherine E. Snow
    (1996) Pragmatic development. Colorado: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nippold, Marilyn A. , and Stephanie T. Martin
    (1989) Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context. A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research32: 58-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nippold, Marylin A. , and Mishelle Rudzinski
    (1993) Familiarity and transparency in idiom explanation: A developmental study with children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research36: 728-737. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3604.728
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3604.728 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nippold, Marylin A. , and Catherine L. Taylor
    (1995) Idiom understanding in youth: Further examination of familiarity and transparency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research38: 426-433. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3802.426
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3802.426 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nippold, Marylin A. , Catherine L. Taylor , and Jennifer M. Baker
    (1996) Idiom understanding in Australian youth: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research39: 442-447. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3902.442
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3902.442 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nippold, Marylin A. , Catherine Moran , and Ilsa E. Schwartz
    (2001) Idiom understanding in preadolescents: Synergy in action. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 10.2: 169-179. doi: 10.1044/1058‑0360(2001/016)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2001/016) [Google Scholar]
  31. Spector, Cecile C
    (1996) Children’s comprehension of idioms in the context of humor. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in School 27.4: 307-313. doi: 10.1044/0161‑1461.2704.307
    https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2704.307 [Google Scholar]
  32. Steinhart, Eric , and Eva Feider, Kittay
    (1998) Metaphor. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsderdam: Elsevier, pp. 576-581.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Titone, Debra A. , and Cynthia M. Connine
    (1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expression. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1655-1674. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00008‑9
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tomasello, Michael
    (2000) The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics 10.4: 401-414.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Toplak, Maggie , and Albert N. Katz
    (2000) On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1467-1488. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00101‑0
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0 [Google Scholar]
  36. Verschueren, Jef , Jan-Ola Östman , and Jan Blommaert
    (eds) (1995) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hop.m
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hop.m [Google Scholar]
  37. Verschueren, Jef
    (1999) Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics 10.4: 439-456.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vincente, Begoña
    (1992) Metaphor, meaning, and comprehension. Pragmatics 2.1: 49-62.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.12.4.01lav
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Children , French Language , Idioms , Pragmatics and Understanding
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error