Ethnography, discourse, and hegemony
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Engaging Raymond Williams’ argument (1977: 112) that “[a] lived hegemony is always a process ... [that] can never be singular,” this paper examines contrary tendencies toward domination and autonomy in national debates about education, classroom-based reading practices, and students’ formation of literate identities. In particular, I explore the dynamics of inequality and reflexivity through an ethnographic-and-discursive analysis of a US urban middle school undergoing pedagogical reform. The school presents a balance, roughly 50/50, of students living in poverty and not living in poverty and from majority and non-majority ethnoracial backgrounds. Because of statewide pressures to “improve test scores,” the school has agreed to an ambitious English Language Arts curriculum initiative which encourages reflexive self-guidance among teachers and students. The paper presents analyses of public debates about literacy and of classroom interactional dynamics as well as case studies of ‘struggling readers,’ that is, young adolescent deemed unsuccessful at school literacy. The analysis of literacy debates focuses on the displacement of class and race “effects” in discussions of pedagogical reform. The classroom analyses focus on conditions of pedagogical inclusion and exclusion and the apparent role of class, race, and gender in such conditions. The case studies focus on the articulation of school and non-school literate identities and the role of class, race, and gender in those identities and their articulation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adams, M
    (1993) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allington, R
    (ed.) (2002) Big Brother and the National Reading Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allington, R. , and H. Woodside-Jiron
    (1999) The politics of literacy research: How 'research' shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher 28: 4-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alverman, D
    (2001) Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy44: 676-691.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Angelis, J
    (2001) Let us not abandon our older readers. English Update: A Newsletter from the Center on English Learning and Achievement, pp. 1, 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauman, Z
    (1997) Postmodernity and its discontents. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berliner, D. , and B. Biddle
    (1995) The manufactured crisis: Myths, frauds, and the attack on public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernstein, B
    (1996) Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brownstein, A
    (1999) Low scores add up to big job ahead. Times Union, pp. A1, A5.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Castells, M
    (1999) Flows, networks, and identities: A critical theory of the information society. In M. Castells , R. Flecha , P. Freire , H. Giroux , D. Macedo , & P. Willis (eds.), Critical Education in the information age. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 37-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cazden, C
    (1988) Classroom discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coles, G
    (1998) Reading lessons: The debate over literacy. New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2000) Misreading reading: The bad science that hurts children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, J
    (2002) The Passions and perils of self-guidance: Learning, youth, and literacy. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins, J. , and C. Woodcock
    (2002) Ecology, identity, and literacy. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Delpit, L
    (1995) Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Donald, J
    (1983) How illiteracy became a problem (and literacy stopped being one). Journal of Education 165.1: 35-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Eckert, P
    (1989) Jocks and burnouts. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Edelsky, C
    (1996) With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairclough, N
    (1995) Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Foorman, B. , J. Francis , J. Fletcher , & C. Schatsneider
    (1998) The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology90: 37-55. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.90.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  22. Freire, P
    (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Frontline
    (2002) Program on testing movement. WMHT (Channel 13).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gee, J
    (1996) Social linguistics and literacies (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Maxwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Giddens, A
    (1991) Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goodman, K
    (1986) What's whole in Whole Language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoare, Q. , and G. N. Smith
    (eds.) (1971) Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiron, H
    (2002) The language of politics and the politics of language: A critical analysis of California reading policy. Dissertation, Department of Reading, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Karlin, R
    (2000) Latest report card eyes school spending. Times Union, pp. A1, A11.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirsch, I. , and A. Jungeblut
    (1986) Literacy: Profiles of America's young adults: Final report. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kontopoulos, K
    (1993) The logics of social structure. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511570971
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570971 [Google Scholar]
  32. Laclau, E. , and C. Mouffe
    (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lemann, N
    (1997) The reading wars. The Atlantic Monthly282: 128-134.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1998) "Ready, read!". Atlantic Monthly283: 92,96, 98-100, 102, 104.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Luttrell, W
    (1997) Schoolsmart and motherwise: Working-class women's identity and schooling. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Males, M
    (1995) The scapegoat generation: America's war on adolescents. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. NCEE
    (1983) A nation at risk. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. NRP
    (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research on reading and its implications for reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nystrand, M. , A. Gamoran , R, Kachur , and C. Prendergast
    (1997) Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the english classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Routman, R
    (2000) Conversations: Strategies for teaching, learning, and evaluating. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shanker, A
    (1986) Our profession, our schools: The case for fundamental reform. American Educator10. 10-17: 44-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Williams, R
    (1977) Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Classroom interaction; Education; Gender; Involvement; Reading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error