1887
Ethnography, discourse, and hegemony
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

The discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe, it is argued, is a model of discursive conflict: Political conflicts are understood as struggles between conflicting discourses that strive to impose their own system of meaning. This article starts by outlining this model as a theoretical framework as well as a set of instruments for political analysis. First the main theoretical concepts are spelled out and clarified. The article then turns to the issue of the rearticulation of the social democratic ideology during the 1990s. The so-called ‘crisis of social democracy’, a crisis that necessitated a transformation of this political project, is outlined together with some of the articulatory practices through which the renewal of social democracy took shape and the discursive background against which it has been articulated. To illustrate the contingency of the articulatory process, the article concludes with a summary of some contested assumptions of the new social democratic model. The overall aim of the article is to illustrate the feasibility and the added value of discourse theory for political research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.13.1.08vos
2003-01-01
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blair, Tony
    (1998) The Third Way: New politics for the new century. Fabian Pamphlet 588, London: Fabian Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carpentier, Nico , and Patrick De Vos
    (2001) De discours theorie van Laclau en Mouffe als denkkader en instrumentarium voor sociaal-wetenschappelijk analyse. Ethiek & Maatschappij 4.4: 3-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuperus, René , and Johannes Kandel
    (1998) The magical return of social democracy: An introduction. In René Cuperus , & Johannes Kandel (eds.), European social democracy: Transformation in progress. Amsterdam: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Wiardi Beckman Stichting, pp. 11-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahrendorf, Ralf
    (1999) The Third Way and liberty: An authoritarian streak in Europe's new center. Foreign Affair 78.5: 13-17. doi: 10.2307/20049446
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20049446 [Google Scholar]
  5. Eddison, Robert , and Barry St. John Nevill
    (1978) An exclusive interview with the Hornsey Journal: Hugh and I. In Hornsey Journal, 28 April. In Christoper Collins (ed.) (1999), Margaret Thatcher: Complete public statements 1945-1990. Database and Compilation on CD-Rom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliott, Gregory
    (1999) Via dollaro$a: On the 'Third Way. Radical Philosophy 94, March-April, 2-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, Norman
    (2000) New Labour, new language? London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Giddens, Anthony
    (1998) The Third Way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, Stuart
    (1998) The great moving nowhere show. Marxism Today November-December, 9-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1991) Het minimale zelf en andere opstellen. Amsterdam: Sua.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1983) The great moving right show. In Stuart Hall , & Jacques Martin (eds.), The politics of Thatcherism. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 19-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hobsbawm, Eric
    (1995) Een eeuw van uitersten: De twintigste eeuw 1914-1991. Het Spectrum: Utrecht/Antwerpen.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hombach, Bodo
    (2000) The politics of the new centre. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Howarth, David
    (2000) Discours. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Howarth, David , and Yannis Stavrakakis
    (2000) Discourse theory and political analysis. In David Howarth , Aletta J. Norval , & Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Howarth, David
    (1998) Discourse theory and political analysis. In Elinor Scarbrough , & Eric Tanenbaum (eds.), Research strategies in the social sciences: A guide to new approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 268-293. doi: 10.1093/0198292376.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198292376.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1997) Complexities of identity/difference: Black consciousness ideology in South Africa. Journal of Political Ideology 2.1: 51-78. doi: 10.1080/13569319708420750
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319708420750 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jessop, Bob
    (1993) Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy40, Spring, 7-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jessop, Bob , Klaus Nielsen , and Jacob Torfing
    (1999) Restructuring welfare states in North Western Europe: Denmark, Sweden, Britain and Germany. Research Report, Roskilde University/Department of Social Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Krieger, Joel
    (1999) British politics in the global age: Can social democracy survive?Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laclau, Ernesto
    (1996) The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideology 1.1:3: 201-220. doi: 10.1080/13569319608420738
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319608420738 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1990) New reflections on the revolution of our time. London/New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1988) Metaphor and social antagonisms. In Cary Nelson , & Lawrence Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture Urbana: University of Illinois, pp. 249-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mouffe, Chantal
    (1999) 10 Years of false starts. New Times, issue 9, November.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (forthcoming) For an agonistic public sphere. Unpublished text.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2000) The democratic paradox. London/New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NEXUS
    (1998)  The Third Way: Summary of the NEXUS on-line discussion . url:www.netnexus.org/library/papers/3way.html
  29. Nielsen, Klaus
    (2001) Globalisation, discourse of competitiveness and institutional change: How has globalisation changed the negotiated economy? Unpublished paper, Roskilde University/Department of Social Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Offe, Claus
    (1984) Contradictions of the modern welfare state. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Philips, Louis
    (1998) Hegemony and political discourse: The lasting impact of Thatcherism. Sociology 32.4: 847-867. doi: 10.1177/0038038598032004011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004011 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rustin, Michael
    (1999) Editorial. Soundings, Issue 11, Spring, 7-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1998) The New Labour project. Soundings8: 7-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sayyid, Bobby , and Lilian Zac
    (1998) Political analysis in a world without foundations. In Elinor Scarbrough , & Eric Tanenbaum (eds.), Research strategies in the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249-267. doi: 10.1093/0198292376.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198292376.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Stravrakakis, Yannis
    (2000) On the emergence of Green ideology: The dislocation factor in Green politics. In David Howarth , Aletta J. Norval , & Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 100-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Telò, Mario
    (1998) Transformation of programmatic profiles. In René Cuperus , & Johannes Kandel (eds.), European social democracy: Transformation in progress. Amsterdam: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Wiardi Beckman Stichting, pp. 41-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Torfing, Jacob
    (1999a) New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1999b) Towards a Schumpeterian workfare postnational regime: Path-shaping and path-dependency in Danish welfare state reform. InEconomy and Society28.3: 369-402. doi: 10.1080/03085149900000010
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149900000010 [Google Scholar]
  39. (1998) Politics, regulation and the modern welfare state. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd. doi: 10.1057/9780230505711
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505711 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1991) A hegemonic approach to capitalist regulation. In René Bertramsen , Jens Bugge , Peter Frølund Thomsen , & Jacob Torfing (eds.), State, economy and society. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 35-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zizek, Slavoj
    (2000a) Wat is het fijn om tegen Haider te zijn. InNieuw Wereldtijdschrift17.3: 43-45
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2000b)  Why do we all Love to Hate Haider? url:platon.ee.duth.gr/data/maillist-archives/cyberurbanity/msg00070.html
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.13.1.08vos
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conflict , Democracy , Discourse theory and Ideology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error