1887
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

The Spanish verbs ‘to threaten’ and ‘to promise’ do not only have a lexical reading but can also yield a subjective one, whereby the likelihood of the event expressed in the infinitive receives a negative, resp. a positive, evaluation. Three hypotheses are being tested: 1) as an outcome of the illocutionary force and the subject commitment attached to lexical the subjective readings of the latter may be expected to score high on the probability scale, whereas the event introduced by subjective will score low, in line with the lack of illocutionary force and weak subject commitment in lexical reading of this verb. 2) The viewpoint substantiated by the two verbs also differs: Whereas renders an event-oriented evidential reading from an internal point of view, projects an external viewpoint leading to a more speaker-oriented subjective reading. 3) As a result of (1) and (2), should easily combine with negatively oriented complements, whereas should resist taking positively oriented ones. The corpus research fully corroborates the first two hypotheses. The data, however, fail to unequivocally sustain the third one, especially because displays more flexibility than expected.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.1.04cor
2004-01-01
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cornillie, Bert
    (2003) The syntax of subjectification in Spanish quasi-modal constructions. Preprint198. Department of Linguistics. K.U.Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (ms.) Agentivity and subjectivity in Spanish prometer ‘to promise’ and amenazar ‘to threaten’. A study of diatopical and constructional variation. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (forthcoming) The distribution of evidential and epistemic modal verbs in Spanish. A formal and cognitive-functional analysis. K.U.Leuven. Doctoral Dissertation. To be submitted inJuly 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, Mark
    (2003) The Corpus del espanol. atwww.corpusdelespanol.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Declerck, Renaat
    (1998) [1991] A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tohyo: Kaitakashu.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hernanz, Ma Llu’isa
    (1999) El infmitivoIn Ignacio Bosque , & Violeta Démonte (eds.), Gramdtica Descriptiva de la Lengua espanola. Vol 2. Madrid: Espasa, pp.2195-2356 [Chap 36].
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nuyts, Jan
    (2001) Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruwet, Nicolas
    (1972) Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991) Syntax and Human Experience. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Searle, John R
    (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  11. Searle, JohnR
    (1979) Expression and Meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  12. Traugott, Elizabeth C
    (1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectifcation in semantic change. Language65: 31-55. doi: 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1997) Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case of promise and threaten . In Toril Swan , & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic Languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.185-210.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vázquez Laslop, Maria Eugenia
    (2001) Epistemic prometer and full deontic verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics14: 241-264. (Thematic volume edited by Johan Van der Auwera, & Patrick Dendale. Modal Verbs in Germanic and Romance languages). doi: 10.1075/bjl.14.13vaz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.14.13vaz [Google Scholar]
  15. Verhagen, Arie
    (1995) Subjectification, syntax and communication. In Dieter Stein , & Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.103-128. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.006 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1996) Sequential conceptualization and linear order. In Eugene Casad (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.793-817.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Vliegen, Maurice
    (ms.) The relation between lexical and epistemic readings: The equivalents of promise and threaten in Dutch and German. Ms. presented at the34th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Louvain, August 28-September 1 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.1.04cor
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error