1887
Relationality
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Employing a conceptual framework informed by theories of cultural production (Lave & Wenger 1991; Levinson & Holland 1996; O’Connor 2003; Willis 1977, 1981), and using notions of linguicism (e.g., Skutnabb-Kangas 2000) and identity “markedness” (Bucholtz & Hal 2004), I examine how an ESL subject position is locally produced by adolescents of Asian and Pacific Islander descent in one high school classroom. Arguing that “ESL” in this context signifies an exoticized cultural and linguistic Other – what some students refer to as “FOB” (“fresh off the boat”) – I analyse a series of classroom interactions in which long-term “generation 1.5” ESL students resist being positioned as FOB, first by challenging their teacher’s positioning, and second, by positioning a newcomer classmate as FOB, instead. While they thereby relationally distinguish themselves as “non-FOB,” these students’ actions reproduce the same linguicism they had ostensibly been resisting. I conclude by considering ways that the reproduction of linguicism might somehow be interrupted.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.03tal
2004-01-01
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anyon, J
    (1980) Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education162: 67-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, C
    (2001) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Banks, J.A
    (2001) Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In J.A. Banks & C.A.M. Banks (eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.3-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker, C. , & D. Galasiński
    (2001) Cultural studies and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barth, F
    (1969) Introduction. In F. Barth (ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference. Bergen-Oslo: Universitets Forlaget, pp.9-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bickel, J
    (2002, December11) The Micronesians: The invisible malihini. Honolulu Weekly.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P. , & J.C. Passeron
    (1977) Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowles, S. , & H. Gintis
    (1977) Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucholtz, M. , & K. Hall
    (2004) Language and identity. In A. Duranti (ed.), Companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp.368-394.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crawford, J
    (1999) Bilingual education: History, politics, theory, and practice (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Bilingual Educational Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawford,. J
    (2002) Obituary: Bilingual Education Act, 1968–2002. Available: ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/T7obit.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crookes, G
    (1997) What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach?Modern Language Journal81.1: 67-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb01627.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01627.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Da Pidgin Coup
    (1999) Pidgin and education. Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Available: www.hawaii.edu/sls/pidgin.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Development Associates
    (2003) Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Paper presented atSecond Annual Summit on English Language Acquisition, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Freire, P
    (1993) Pedagogy of the oppressed ( M.B. Ramos , Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published1970).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Giroux, H.A
    (1983) Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review53: 257-293.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, E
    (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gore, J
    (1992) What we can do for you! What can “we” do for “you”? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge, pp.54-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1993) The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Harklau, L. , K.M. Losey , & M. Siegal
    (eds.) (1999) Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, H.C
    (2002) Culturally responsive schools for Micronesian immigrant students. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hezel, F.X
    (2002) Taking responsibility for our schools: A series of four articles on education in Micronesia. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hooks, B
    (1994) Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeon, M
    (2001) Avoiding FOBs: An account of a journey. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12.1/2: 83-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanno, Y
    (2000)  Kikokushijo as bicultural. International Journal of Intercultural Relations24: 361-382. doi: 10.1016/S0147‑1767(00)00006‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00006-7 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kindler, A
    (2002) Survey of the States’ Limited English Proficient students and available educational programs and services, 1999–2000 summary report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lave, J. , P. Duguid , N. Fernandez , & E. Axel
    (1992) Coming of age in Birmingham: Cultural studies and conceptions of subjectivity. Annual Reviews in Anthropology21: 257-282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.001353
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.001353 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lave, J. , & E. Wenger
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  29. Leung, C. , R. Harris , & B. Rampton
    (1997) The idealised native speaker, reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly31: 543-560. doi: 10.2307/3587837
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587837 [Google Scholar]
  30. Levinson, B.A
    (2001) We are all equal: Student culture and identity at a Mexican secondary school, 1988–1998. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822381075
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381075 [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, B.A. , & D.C. Holland
    (1996) The cultural production of the educated person: An introduction. In B.A. Levinson , D.E. Foley & D.C. Holland (eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp.1-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mace-Matluck, B.J. , R. Alexander-Kasparik , & R.M. Queen
    (1998) Through the golden door: Educational approaches for immigrant adolescents with limited schooling. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics & Delta Systems.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McKay, S.L. , & S.C. Wong
    (1996) Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review66: 577-608.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Morrow, R.A. , & C.A. Torres
    (1995) Social theory and education: A critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. National Center for Education Statistics
    (1996) Are limited English proficient (LEP) students being taught by teachers with LEP training?Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2002) Schools and staffing survey, 1999–2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary and secondary schools (NCES 2002–313). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nieto, S
    (1992) Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Connor, K
    (2003) Communicative practice, cultural production, and situated learning: Constructing and contesting identities of expertise in a heterogeneous learning context. In S. Wortham & B. Rymes (eds.), Linguistic anthropology of education. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp.61-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Office of the Superintendent
    (2003) The Superintendent’s 13th annual report on school performance and improvement in Hawai‘i: 2002 (RS 04-0017). Honolulu: Hawai‘i State Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reyes, A
    (2003) ‘The other Asian’: Linguistic, ethnic and cultural stereotypes at an after-school Asian American teen videomaking project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sakoda, K. , & J. Siegel
    (2003) Pidgin grammar: An introduction to the creole language of Hawai‘i. Honolulu: Bess Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sato, C.J
    (1985) Linguistic inequality in Hawai‘i: The post-creole dilemma. In N. Wolfson & J. Manes (eds.), Language of inequality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.255-272.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (1991) Sociolinguistic variation and language attitudes in Hawai‘i. In J. Cheshire (ed.), English around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.647-663. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611889.044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611889.044 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schieffelin, B.B. , & R.C. Doucet
    (1998) The “real” Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. In B.B. Schieffelin , K.A. Woolard & P.V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.285-316.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Skutnabb-Kangas, T
    (2000) Linguistic genocide in education - or worldwide diversity and human rights?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. , & R. Phillipson
    (1994) Linguistic human rights, past and present. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & R. Phillipson (eds.), Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.71-110.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Talmy, S
    (2001) Putting ‘em back on the boat: Representational politics in the administration of generation 1.5 students. Paper presented atthe American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, St. Louis, MO.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Thesen, L
    (1997) Voices, discourse, and transition: In search of new categories in EAP. TESOL Quarterly31: 487-511. doi: 10.2307/3587835
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587835 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tollefson, J.W. , & A.B.M. Tsui
    (eds.) (2004) Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tomlinson, C.A
    (1999) The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tuan, M
    (1998) Forever foreigners or honorary whites?: The Asian ethnic experience today. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wiley, T.G. , & W.E. Wright
    (2004) Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the “age of accountability”. Educational Policy18.1: 142-168. doi: 10.1177/0895904803260030
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260030 [Google Scholar]
  53. Willis, P
    (1977) Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1981) Cultural production is different from cultural reproduction is different from social reproduction is different from reproduction. Interchange12.2/3: 48-67. doi: 10.1007/BF01192107
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192107 [Google Scholar]
  55. Woolard, K.A
    (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B.B. Schieffelin , K.A. Woolard & P.V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.3-47.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.03tal
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error