• ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


From an interactionally enriched linguistic anthropological perspective, this article promotes the view that identity is indexical with specific sets of acts and stances, which in turn are constructed by specific language forms. Based on detailed sequential and grammatical analyses of data from Chinese heritage language classes, it argues that identity is dynamic, constantly unfolding along with interaction, and thus has the potential to shift and mutate. It positions identity as emerging through co-participants’ responses and reactions and thus as an intersubjective and reciprocal entity. It further suggests that identity construction is intricately linked with heritage language learning.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Atkinson, J.M. , and J. Heritage
    (eds.) (1984) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bucholtz, M. , and K. Hall
    (2004) Language and identity. To appear in A. Duranti (ed.), Companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp.369-394.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdieu, P
    (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. R. Nice (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradunas, E. , and B. Topping
    (eds.) (1988) Ethnic heritage and language schools in America. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew, P. , and J. Heritage
    (eds.) (1992) Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford, C. , and S. Thompson
    (1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs , E. Schegloff , and S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.52-134. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  7. Garfinkel, H
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gumperz, J.J. , and J. Cook-Gumperz
    (1982) Language and the communication of social identity. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.), Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. He, A.W
    (1995) Co-constructing institutional identities: The case of student counselees. Research on Language and Social Interaction28.3: 213-231. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_3 [Google Scholar]
  10. (1997) Learning and being: Identity construction in the classroom. Pragmatics and Language Learning8: 201-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1998) Reconstructing institutions: Language use in academic counseling encounters. Greenwich, CT and London, UK: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2000) Grammatical and sequential organization of teachers’ directives. Linguistics and Education11.2: 119-140. doi: 10.1016/S0898‑5898(00)00025‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00025-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2003) Linguistic anthropology and language education. In S. Wortham and B. Rymes (eds.), Linguistic anthropology of education. Westport, CT and London: Praeger, pp.93-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin-Jones, M
    (1998) Teaching and learning bilingually: A survey of recent research. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, Kings College, London. Available atwww.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/ULL/WP10MMJ.doc.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ochs, E
    (1990) Indexicality and socialization. In J.W. Stigler , R. Shweder , and G. Herdt (eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.287-308. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.335-358.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1993) Constructing social identity. Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 287-306. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J.J. Gumperz and S.L. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press, pp.407-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ochs, E. , and B. Schieffelin
    (1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. In R. Schweder and R. LeVine (eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.276-320.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Peyton, J.K. , D.A. Ranard , and S. McGinnis
    (eds.) (2001) Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems Co, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rampton, B
    (1995) Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sacks, H
    (1992) Lctures on conversation. (volumes 1 and 2.)Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , and G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  24. Schegloff, E.A
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and semantics12: 261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology95/5: 1295-1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1996) Third turn repair. In G.R. Guy , C. Feagin , D. Schiffrin , and J. Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language. Papers in honors of William Labov, vol 2: Social interaction and discourse structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.31-40. doi: 10.1075/cilt.128
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.128 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schegloff, E.A. , G. Jefferson , and H. Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-repair in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schieffelin, B. , and E. Ochs
    (eds.) (1986a) Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1986b) Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology15: 163-191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001115
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001115 [Google Scholar]
  30. (1996) The microgenesis of competence. In D. Slobin , J. Gerhardt , A. Kyratzis , and J. Guo (eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.251-264.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vygotsky, L
    (1978) Thought and language. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, X
    (ed.) (1996) A view from within: A case study of Chinese heritage community language schools in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wortham, S. , and B. Rymes
    (eds.) (2003) Linguistic anthropology of education. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese; Classroom discourse; Heritage language; Language and identity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error