1887
Relationality
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Previous work on Korean grammar has claimed that one person can not have access to another person’s thoughts, feelings or sensations, as indicated by the use of evidential markers. By looking at cases in which a teacher at a Korean heritage language school claims to read her students’ minds with a high degree of certainty, I demonstrate how expressions of epistemic stance relate to moral evaluation. Speakers portray their access to the thoughts and sensations of individuals who they deem morally worthy as more distant and uncertain. When individuals are evaluated as morally suspect, however, speakers represent these persons’ emotions, thoughts and sensations as self-evident displays of affect. This paper thus argues that evidential marking in Korean interaction is a social act through which interlocutors morally evaluate others.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.08lo
2004-01-01
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abelmann, Nancy
    (2003) The melodrama of mobility : Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha, Asif
    (2004) Epistemic stance. Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
    (2003) Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.131-164. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.09aik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.09aik [Google Scholar]
  4. Benveniste, Emile
    (1971) Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cha, Jae-Ho
    (1994) Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In Uichol Kim , Harry C. Triandis , Çigdem. Kagitçibasi , Sang Chin Choi and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.157-174.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, Soonja
    (1991) Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language11: 93-119. doi: 10.1177/014272379101103105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379101103105 [Google Scholar]
  7. de Reuse, Wilhem J
    (2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.79-100. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.07reu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.07reu [Google Scholar]
  8. Dredge, C. Paul
    (1983) What is politeness in Korean speech?Korean Linguistics3: 21-32. doi: 10.1075/kl.3.03cpd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.3.03cpd [Google Scholar]
  9. Fox, Barbara A
    (2001) Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11.2: 167-192. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167 [Google Scholar]
  10. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanks, William F
    (1990) Referential practice : Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffman, Diane M
    (1999) Lanterns on the river: Essays on life and culture in contemporary South Korea. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    (1993) Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: Theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamio, Akio
    (1995) Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics24.3: 235-264. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00064‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00064-L [Google Scholar]
  15. (1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Ki-Hong
    (1978) Cultural and linguistic variables in the language of emotion of Americans and Koreans. In Chin-u Kim , Samuel Elmo Martin , Ho-min Sohn and Seok C. Song (eds.), Papers in Korean linguistics. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, pp.259-267.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuroda, S.-Y
    (1973) Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from the Japanese. In Paul Kiparsky and Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp.377-391.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, Ronald W
    (1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntaxAmsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.109-150. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.07lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.07lan [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Hyo Sang
    (1993) Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics4.2: 135-167. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.135 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lyons, John
    (1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley, pp.101-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, Samuel Elmo , Yang Ha Lee , and Sung-Un Chang
    (1967) A Korean-English dictionary. New Haven. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maynard, Senko K
    (1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.24 [Google Scholar]
  23. McLendon, Sally
    (2003) Evidentials in eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.101-129. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl [Google Scholar]
  24. Mushin, Ilana
    (2001) Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.87 [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, Mae-Ran
    (1990) Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp.111-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Raymond, Geoffrey , and John Heritage
    (2004) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Manuscript.
  27. Scheibman, Joanne
    (2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.11 [Google Scholar]
  28. Silverstein, Michael
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp.11-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sohn, Ho-Min
    (1986a) Strategies of indirection in Korean. InLinguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp.266-279
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1986b) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. InLinguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp.389-410.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sohn, Sung-Ock S. , and Mee-Jeong Park
    (2003) Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. In Patricia Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.105-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Suh, Cheong-Soo
    (1996) Kwuke mwunpep (Korean grammar). Seoul: Hanyang University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Suzuki, Satoko
    (1998) Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics29.4: 429-462. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00050‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00050-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Yum, June O
    (1987) Korean philosophy and communication. In D. Lawrence Kincaid (eds.), Communication theory : Eastern and western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp.71-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yum, Young-Ok , and Daniel J. Canary
    (2003) Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. In Daniel J. Canary and Marianne Dainton (eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.277-296.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.08lo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Epistemic stance , Evidentiality , Korean language , Morality and Subjectivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error