oa Evidentiality and morality in a Korean heritage language school

References

1. Abelmann, Nancy
   (2003) The melodrama of mobility : Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agha, Asif
   (2004) Epistemic stance. Ms.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
   (2003) Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.131-164. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.09aik
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.09aik [Google Scholar]
4. Benveniste, Emile
   (1971) Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek .
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cha, Jae-Ho
   (1994) Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In Uichol Kim , Harry C. Triandis , Çigdem. Kagitçibasi , Sang Chin Choi and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.157-174.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Choi, Soonja
   (1991) Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language11: 93-119. doi: 10.1177/014272379101103105
   https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379101103105 [Google Scholar]
7. de Reuse, Wilhem J
   (2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.79-100. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.07reu
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.07reu [Google Scholar]
8. Dredge, C. Paul
   (1983) What is politeness in Korean speech?Korean Linguistics3: 21-32. doi: 10.1075/kl.3.03cpd
   https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.3.03cpd [Google Scholar]
9. Fox, Barbara A
   (2001) Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11.2: 167-192. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167
   https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167 [Google Scholar]
10. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hanks, William F
    (1990) Referential practice : Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hoffman, Diane M
    (1999) Lanterns on the river: Essays on life and culture in contemporary South Korea. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    (1993) Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: Theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.2 [Google Scholar]
14. Kamio, Akio
    (1995) Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics24.3: 235-264. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00064‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00064-L [Google Scholar]
15. Kamio, Akio
    (1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
16. Kim, Ki-Hong
    (1978) Cultural and linguistic variables in the language of emotion of Americans and Koreans. In Chin-u Kim , Samuel Elmo Martin , Ho-min Sohn and Seok C. Song (eds.), Papers in Korean linguistics. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, pp.259-267.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kuroda, S.-Y
    (1973) Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from the Japanese. In Paul Kiparsky and Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp.377-391.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Langacker, Ronald W
    (1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntaxAmsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.109-150. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.07lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.07lan [Google Scholar]
19. Lee, Hyo Sang
    (1993) Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics4.2: 135-167. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.135 [Google Scholar]
20. Lyons, John
    (1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley, pp.101-124.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Martin, Samuel Elmo , Yang Ha Lee , and Sung-Un Chang
    (1967) A Korean-English dictionary. New Haven. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Maynard, Senko K
    (1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.24 [Google Scholar]
23. McLendon, Sally
    (2003) Evidentials in eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.101-129. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl [Google Scholar]
24. Mushin, Ilana
    (2001) Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.87 [Google Scholar]
25. Park, Mae-Ran
    (1990) Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp.111-128.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Raymond, Geoffrey , and John Heritage
    (2004) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Manuscript.
27. Scheibman, Joanne
    (2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.11 [Google Scholar]
28. Silverstein, Michael
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp.11-56.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sohn, Ho-Min
    (1986a) Strategies of indirection in Korean. InLinguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp.266-279
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sohn, Ho-Min
    (1986b) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. InLinguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp.389-410.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sohn, Ho-Min
    (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sohn, Sung-Ock S. , and Mee-Jeong Park
    (2003) Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. In Patricia Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.105-118.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Suh, Cheong-Soo
    (1996) Kwuke mwunpep (Korean grammar). Seoul: Hanyang University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Suzuki, Satoko
    (1998) Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics29.4: 429-462. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00050‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00050-7 [Google Scholar]
35. Yum, June O
    (1987) Korean philosophy and communication. In D. Lawrence Kincaid (eds.), Communication theory : Eastern and western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp.71-86.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Yum, Young-Ok , and Daniel J. Canary
    (2003) Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. In Daniel J. Canary and Marianne Dainton (eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.277-296.
    [Google Scholar]