1887
Volume 15, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

The linguistic phenomenon of recurrence is identified in two aspects; either as a repetition of an action or a restoration to a former state. This paper examines two lexical items, an auxiliary verb and an adverb , which encode this phenomenon in Akan. The recurrence marker is claimed to be the output of a grammaticalization process which has as its historical input a phonologically identical lexical verb with a restorative meaning. Even though the recurrence marker is diachronically associated with restoration, its use gives rise to either a restorative or a repetitive assumption, in the form of an implicated premise. This assumption forms part of the context within which the utterance containing is interpreted. Thus its function coincides with that of , except for one particular use of the latter, associated with its occurrence at utterance-initial position. The almost identical functions of these two markers reveal the close conceptual relationship between recurrence of the repetitive and of the restorative type.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.15.2-3.01amf
2005-01-01
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amfo, N.A.A
    (2005) Modal marking in Akan: The case of anka. Journal of Pragmatics37: 997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amfo, N.A.A. , S.A. Boateng , and T. Fretheim
    (2004) Markers of recurrence in two European and two African Languages. Working papers ISK, 1/2004 , Special issue on Contrastive Lexical Pragmatics. Trondheim: NTNU, pp. 1-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen, G
    (2001) Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents. Pragmatics and Beyond, New series, 84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.84
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, G. , and T. Fretheim
    (eds.) (2000) Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude. Pragmatics and Beyond, New series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.79
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.79 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakemore, D
    (1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1992) Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2002) Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blass, R
    (1990) Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586293
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586293 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carston, R
    (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470754603
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fretheim, T
    (2001) A relevance-theoretic account of the way we use and understand the English temporal adverb again and its Norwegian counterpart igjen . Languages in contrast 3.1: 41-94. doi: 10.1075/lic.3.1.04fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.3.1.04fre [Google Scholar]
  11. Fretheim, T. , S.A. Boateng , and I. Vaskó
    (2003)  Then -adverbial pro-form or inference particle? A comparative study of English, Ewe, Hungarian and Norwegian. In K.M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Meaning through language contrast. Vol. 2. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 51-74. doi: 10.1075/pbns.100.04fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.100.04fre [Google Scholar]
  12. Greenbaum, S
    (1969) Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H.P
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heine, B. , U. Claudi , and F. Hünnemeyer
    (1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heine, B. , and M. Reh
    (1984) Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Budke Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopper, P.J
    (1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-35. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  17. Hopper, P.J. , and E.C. Traugott
    (2003) Grammaticalization. 1st edition 1993 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G. , and M. Johnson
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lehmann, C
    (1985) Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20.3: 303-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1995) Thoughts on grammaticalization. Lincom studies in theoretical linguistics. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicolle, S
    (1998) A relevance theory perspective on grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics9.1: 1-35. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2002) Distal aspects in Bantu languagesIn K.M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Meaning through Language Contrast. Vol. 2. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, doi: 10.1075/pbns.100.02nicpp. 3-22.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.100.02nic [Google Scholar]
  23. Noh, E-J
    (2000) The semantics and pragmatics of metarepresentation in English: A relevance-theoretic account. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.69
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.69 [Google Scholar]
  24. Osam, E.K.A
    (1994) Aspects of Akan Grammar: A functional perspective. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004) The Trondheim Lectures: An introduction to the structure of Akan, its verbal and multiverbal systems. Legon: Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Recanati, F
    (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sperber, D. , and D. Wilson
    (1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edition with a postface. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First published 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson, D. , and D. Sperber
    (1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90.1-2: 1-25. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2004) Relevance theory. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.15.2-3.01amf
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Akan , Grammaticalization , Implicature , Recurrence and Relevance theory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error