1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper aims at an explanation of the discrepancies between natural intuitions and standard logic in terms of a distinction between NATURAL and CONSTRUCTED levels of cognition, applied to the way human cognition deals with sets. NATURAL SET THEORY (NST) restricts standard set theory cutting it down to naturalness. The restrictions are then translated into a theory of natural logic. The predicate logic resulting from these restrictions turns out to be that proposed in Hamilton (1860) and Jespersen (1917). Since, in this logic, NO is a quantifier in its own right, different from NOT-SOME, and given the assumption that natural lexicalization processes occur at the level of basic naturalness, single-morpheme lexicalizations for NOT-ALL should not occur, just as there is no single-morpheme lexicalization for NOT-SOME at that level. An analogous argument is developed for the systematic absence of lexicalizations for NOT-AND in propositional logic.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.16.1.02seu
2006-01-01
2019-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barwise, Jon , and Robin Cooper
    (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy4.2: 159–219. doi: 10.1007/BF00350139
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 [Google Scholar]
  2. Butterworth, Brian
    (1999) The Mathematical Brain. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Morgan, Augustus
    (1847) Formal logic: or, the calculus of inference, necessary and probable. London: Taylor & Walton.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dehaene, Stanislas
    (1997) The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2005) Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In Stanislas Dehaene , Jean-René Duhamel , Marc D. Hauser , and Giacomo Rizzolatti (eds.), From monkey brain to human brain. A Fyssen Foundation symposium. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehaene, Stanislas , Véronique Izard , Pierre Pica , and Elisabeth Spelke
    (in press) Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginsburg, Herbert P. , and Barbara S. Allardice
    (1984) Children’s difficulties with school mathematics. In: Barbara Rogoff and Jean Lave (eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 194–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton, William
    (1860) Lectures on Logic. Edinburgh: Blackwood & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoeksema, Jack
    (1999) Blocking effects and polarity sensitivity. In J. Gerbrandy , M. Marx , M. de Rijke , and Y. Venema (eds.), JFAK. Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press (not available in hard copy)www.illc.uva.nl/j50/contribs/hoeksema/hoeksema.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Horn, Larry R
    (1989) A Natural History of Negation. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jespersen, Otto
    (1917) Negation in English and Other Languages. Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I,5. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst & søn.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kneale, William , and Martha Kneale
    (1962) The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kratzer, Angelika
    (1979) Conditional necessity and possibility. In Rainer Bäuerle , Urs Egli , and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, pp. 117–147. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑67458‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  14. Levinson, Stephen C
    (2000) Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pica, Pierre , Cathy Lemer , Véronique Izard , and Stanislas Dehaene
    (2004) Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science306. (October 2004): 499–503. doi: 10.1126/science.1102085
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102085 [Google Scholar]
  16. Seuren, Pieter A.M
    (1974) Negative’s travels. In Pieter A.M. Seuren (ed.), Semantic Syntax. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. . (in prep.) Language and Logic in Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Fraassen, Bas
    (1971) Formal Semantics and Logic. New York-London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zwicky, Arnold
    (1973) Linguistics as chemistry: The substance theory of semantic primes. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt & Cy, pp. 467–485.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.16.1.02seu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gricean maxims , Logical intuitions , Natural logic , Natural set theory and Valuation space analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error