Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This paper analyses a corpus of compliment responses in Turkish according to the conversational maxim approach (Leech 1983, 2003) and the face-management approach (Brown and Levinson 1987) with a view to extending the conceptualisation of self-presentation in theorising on politeness. It observes that the two theories ground politeness on consideration for alter and give precedence to politeness in the sense of displaying deference and solidarity at the expense of self-politeness, described in the present study as speaker need for display of competence, self-confidence, and individuality in interaction, besides the need for non-imposition. Regarding the maxim approach, the paper argues that conversational implicatures triggered by a variety of responses ultimately tie to the Tact Maxim and more specifically to the Sympathy Maxim in the Turkish context. The analysis reveals that compliment responses may override the Politeness Principle, that self-presentational concerns are crucial motivating factors, and that face concerns need to be incorporated into the model. From the perspective of the face-management approach, the study supports the claim in O’Driscoll (1996) and Spencer-Oatey (2000) that the notions of positive and negative face as need for community and autonomy need to be disentangled from the theory’s conceptualisation of face as public self-image. With the incorporation of a number of self-politeness strategies, the face-theoretic analysis builds on this distinction and integrates it with the concept of interactional imbalance by extending an analytic framework adapted from Bayraktaroğlu (1991). The paper concludes with suggestions on how the two theories may complement each other.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Austin, J.L
    (1962) How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baba, Junko
    (1996) A study of interlanguage pragmatics: Compliment responses by learners of Japanese and English as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, UMI No.: 9719290.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach, Kent , and Robert M. Harnish
    (1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnlund, Dean C. , and Shoko Araki
    (1985) Intercultural encounters: The management of compliments by Japanese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology16.1: 9-26. doi: 10.1177/0022002185016001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002185016001002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayraktaroğlu, Arın
    (1991) Politeness and interactional imbalance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language92: 5-34. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Rong
    (1993) Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics20: 49-75. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90106‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y [Google Scholar]
  8. (2001) Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics33: 87-106. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics25: 349-67. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eelen, Gino
    (2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome's Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ensari, Nurcan , and Norman Miller
    (1998) Effect of affective reactions by an out-group on preferences for crossed categorization discussion partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75: 1503-1527. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.75.6.1503
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1503 [Google Scholar]
  12. Festinger, Leon
    (1962[1957]) Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, Bruce
    (1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics14: 219-236. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90081‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Erving
    (1982[1967]) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Golato, Andrea
    (2002) German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics34: 547-571. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00040‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00040-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grice, Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haugh, Michael , and Carl Hinze
    (2003) A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics35: 1581-1611. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00049‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00049-3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Henderson, Anita
    (1996) Compliments, compliment responses, and politeness in an African-American community. In J. Arnold , R. Blake , B. Davidson , S. Schwenter , and J. Solomon (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis, selected papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford. Stanford, CA: Center for Language and Information, pp. 195-208.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Herbert, Robert K
    (1990) Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society19: 201-224. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500014378
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014378 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1997) The sociology of compliment work in Polish and English. In N. Coupland and A. Jaworski (eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader and coursebook. London: Macmillan, pp. 487-500.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hess, Jon A
    (2000) Maintaining nonvoluntary relationships with disliked partners. Human Communication Research 26.3: 458-488. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2000.tb00765.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00765.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofstede, Geert
    (1998) Masculinity/femininity as a dimension of culture. In G. Hofstede (ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 3-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holmes, Janet
    (1986) Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics 28.4: 485-508.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1995) Women, men and politeness. London, New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kağıtçıbaşı, Çiğdem
    (1996) The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist. 1.3: 180-186. doi: 10.1027/1016‑9040.1.3.180
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kasper, Gabriele
    (1990) Linguistic politeness – current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics14: 193-218. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90080‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W [Google Scholar]
  27. Leech, Geoffrey
    (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2003) Towards an anatomy of politeness in communication. International Journal of PragmaticsXIV: 101-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, Dilin
    (1995) Sociocultural transfer and its effects on second language speakers’ communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19.2: 253-265. doi: 10.1016/0147‑1767(94)00008‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)00008-L [Google Scholar]
  30. Manes, Joan , and Nessa Wolfson
    (1981) The compliment formula. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routines: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 115-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mao, LuMing Robert
    (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics21: 451-486. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier, A.J
    (1995) Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics24: 381-392. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00053‑H
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00053-H [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Driscoll, Jim
    (1996) About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics25: 1-32. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00069‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00069-X [Google Scholar]
  34. Pérez Hernández, Lorena
    (1999) Grounding politeness. Journal of English Studies1: 209-236.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1978) Compliment responses. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 79-112. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred and dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rogers, Priscilla S , and Song Mei Lee-Wong
    (2003) Re-conceptualizing politeness to accommodate dynamic tensions in subordinate-to-superior reporting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication17.4: 379-412. doi: 10.1177/1050651903255401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651903255401 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ruhi, Şükriye
    (2002) Complimenting women in Turkish: Gendering and otherness. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 401-427. doi: 10.1075/pbns.98.24ruh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.24ruh [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruhi, Şükriye , and Gürkan Doğan
    (2001) Relevance theory and compliments as phatic communication: The case of Turkish. In A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou (eds.), Linguistic politeness across boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 341-390. doi: 10.1075/pbns.88.13ruh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.88.13ruh [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruhi, Şükriye , and Hale Işık
    (2005) Face and facework in Turkish: Revelations from politeness lexemes and idioms in Turkish. Paper presented atthe 9th International Conference on Pragmatics, 10-15 July, 2005, Riva del Garda.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwartz, Shalom , Gila Melech , Arielle Lehmann , Steven Burgess , Mari Harris , and Vicki Owens
    (2001) Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology32.5: 519–542. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Searle, John
    (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society5: 1-23. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sifianou, Maria
    (2001) “Oh, how appropriate” compliments and politeness. In A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou (eds.), Linguistic politeness across Boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 391-430. doi: 10.1075/pbns.88.14sif
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.88.14sif [Google Scholar]
  45. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    (2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 11–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2002) Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics34: 529-545. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  47. (2005) (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research1: 95-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Spencer-Oatey, Helen , Patrick Ng , and Li Dong
    (2000) Responding to compliments: British and Chinese evaluative judgements. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 53-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Spencer-Oatey, Helen , and Wenying Jiang
    (2003) Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: Moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics35: 1633-1650. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00025‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00025-0 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tezcan, Mahmut
    (1974) Türklerle ilgili stereotipler (kalıp yargılar) ve Türk değerleri üzerine bir deneme [The stereotypes about Turks and a study on Turkish values]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomas, Jenny
    (1995) Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ting-Toomey, Stella , and A. Kurogi
    (1998) Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations22.2: 187-225. doi: 10.1016/S0147‑1767(98)00004‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yu, Ming-chung
    (2003) On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics35: 1679-1710. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00074‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00074-2 [Google Scholar]
  54. Watts, Richard
    (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wierzbicka, Anna
    (1991) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wolfson, Nessa
    (1983) An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson , E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Newbury House Publishers, Rowley/London/Tokyo: Newbury House Publishers, pp. 82-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (Im)politeness; Face; Self-politeness; Turkish compliment responses
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error