1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Although a large number of studies are conducted on Japanese demonstratives, most of them explain referential functions of the three demonstrative types (the so-called proximal , medial , and distal ) based on sentence-level analysis, and little previous work has been directed toward the analysis of the demonstrative use in spontaneous interaction. This study employs Japanese conversational data and examines the demonstrative usages whose main function is NOT to refer to some entity in the speech situation or the discourse. From the analysis, the paper shows that the use of Japanese demonstratives can exhibit and emphasize an interactional meaning, such as the speaker’s antipathy, insult, suspicion, surprise, and affection toward the referent, and that it can be selected from among other choices, such as a noun phrase or ellipsis, when the speaker is willing to express these emotions or attitudes. In order to understand the process of expressing these emotions or attitudes, the paper applies Hanks’ (1990, 1992) ‘indexical framework’ and the interactionally defined notion of the speaker’s and addressee’s sphere proposed by Laury (1997) and Enfield (2003). Using these frameworks, this study illustrates that the relationship among the speaker’s and addressee’s spheres and the referent, as well as the context in which the three are projected, are not static or predefined but instead are flexible and do change during ongoing interaction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.16.4.04nar
2006-01-01
2019-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, S. , & E. Keenan
    (1985) Deixis. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259-308.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ando, S
    (1986) Nichi-Eigo no daikushisu: Joo [Deixis in Japanese and English vol. 1]. Eigo kyooiku [The English teachers' magazine] 34-12: 70-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook, H.M
    (1992) Meanings of non-referential indexes: A case study of the Japanese sentence-final particle ne . Text12-4: 507-539.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1993) Functions of the filler ano in Japanese. In S. Choi (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 3. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 19-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Diessel, H
    (1999) Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, J. , S. Schuetze-Coburn , D. Paolino , & S. Cumming
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (eds.), Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duranti, A
    (1984) The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text4-4: 277-311.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Enfield, N.J
    (2003) Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language79-1: 82-117. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0075
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0075 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fillmore, C.J
    (1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp. 31-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujii, Y
    (1995) Nihongo no gojun no gyakuten ni tsuite [On reversed word order in Japanese]. In K. Takami (ed.), Nihongo no uhoo idoo koobun: Sono koozoo to kinoo [Right dislocation in Japanese: Structure and function]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo, pp. 167-198.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M.A.K. , & R. Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamaguchi, T
    (2001) Co-construction of meaning in intergenerational family conversations: A case of the Japanese demonstrative pronoun are . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
  14. Hanks, W.F
    (1990) Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1992) The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hattori, S
    (1968) Eigo kiso goi no kenkyuu [Studies on English basic lexicon]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayashi, M
    (2004) Projection and grammar: Notes on the 'action-projecting' use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics36-8: 1337-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Himmelmann, N
    (1996) Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In B. Fox (ed.), Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 205-254. doi: 10.1075/tsl.33.08him
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.08him [Google Scholar]
  19. Horiguchi, K
    (1978) Shijishi no hyoogensei [Expressivity of demonstratives]. Nihongo Nihon-bunka [Japanese language and culture] 8: 23-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hymes, D
    (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamio, A
    (1990) Joohoo no nawabari riron: Gengo no kinooteki bunseki [Theory of territory of information: Functional analysis of language]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kinsui, S. , & Y. Takubo
    (1990) Danwa kanri riron kara mita Nihongo no shijishi [A discourse management of the Japanese demonstrative expressions]. In the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (ed.), Ninchi kagaku no hatten [Advances in Japanese cognitive science vol. 3]. Tokyo: Kodansha, pp. 85-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirsner, R
    (1979) Deixis in discourse: An exploratory quantitative study of the modern Dutch demonstrative adjectives. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 355-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kitagawa, C
    (1979) A note on sono and ano . In G. Bedell , E. Kobayashi & M. Muraki (eds.), Explorations in linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue. Tokyo: Kenkyusha, pp. 232-243.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kitano, H
    (1999) On interaction and grammar: Evidence from one use of the Japanese demonstrative are ('that'). Pragmatics9-3: 383-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuno, S
    (1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuroda, S
    (1979) (Ko-) so- a- ni tsuite [On (ko-), so- and a-]. Eigo to Nihongo to [English and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan, pp. 41-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, R
    (1974) Remarks on this and that . Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , pp. 345-356.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Laury, R
    (1997) Demonstratives in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.7
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyons, J
    (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayes, P. , & T. Ono
    (1991) Social factors influencing reference in Japanese: With a special emphasis on ano hito . Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics3: 84-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Maynard, S.K
    (1989) Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization through structure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mikami, A
    (1970) Ko-so-a-do- shoo [On ko-so-a-do-]. Bunpoo shooron shuu [Papers on grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan, pp. 145-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mithun, M
    (1987) The grammatical nature and discourse power of demonstratives. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , pp. 184-194.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Naruoka, K
    (2004) Variations of demonstratives and their functions in Japanese and American English conversation. Papers from the twenty-first national conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan , pp. 130-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Naruoka, K.
    (in press) Expressive function of Japanese adnominal demonstrative konna/sonna/anna . In M. E. Hudson & S.A. Jun & P. Sells (eds.) Japanese/Korean linguistics 13. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ochs, E. , & B. Schieffelin
    (1989) Language has a heart. Text9-1: 7-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ono, K
    (1994) Territories of information and Japanese demonstratives. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese28-1: 131-155. doi: 10.2307/489288
    https://doi.org/10.2307/489288 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ono, T. , & R. Suzuki
    (1992) Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and grammaticization. Text12-3: 429-445.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sakuma, K
    (1951) Geidai Nihongo no hyoogen to gohoo [Expressions and usages in modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Kooseikaku.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schiffrin, D
    (1987) Discourse marker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  42. Shibatani, M
    (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Silverstein, M
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso & H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Strauss, S
    (1993) Why 'this' and 'that' are not complete without 'it'. Papers from thetwenty-ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 403-417.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Takahashi, T
    (1956) Bamen to ba [Situation and context]. Kokugo Kokubun [Japanese Language and Japanese Literature] 25-9: 53-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Talmy, L
    (1978) Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language vol. 4: Syntax. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 625-649.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.16.4.04nar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error