1887
A closer look at cultural difference
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This commentary reviews the five studies of intercultural communication in this special issue by comparing the nature of data analyzed and analytical procedures adopted. The data span from Africa, Asia, to North America, where different cultural, national, or ethnic groups were engaged in different types of social activities; their diversity illustrates how the participants’ ascription of, and resistance towards, their cultural, national, or ethnic identities reflect unique features of the sociohistorical contexts and the nature of their activities. In order to investigate such distinct treatments of interculturality, the researchers seek an analytical lens in the frameworks of ‘interactional sociolinguistics’ (Goffman 1974, 1981; Gumperz 1982, 1992) and ‘membership categorization analysis’ (Sacks 1972, 1992). The metamethodological reflection considers the selection of focal phenomena as well as the use of ethnographic information and the researchers’ own membership knowledge in the process of interpretation, and addresses the issues concerning how to attain an “emic” perspective of cultural difference and sameness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17.1.06mor
2007-01-01
2019-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antaki, Charles , and Sue Widdicombe
    (eds.) (1998) Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelson, Elizabeth
    (2007) Vocatives: A double-edged strategy in intercultural discourse among graduate students. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhabha, Homi, K
    (1994) The location of culture. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cutler, Cecilia
    (2007) The co-construction of Whiteness in an MC battle. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Day, Dennis
    (1994) Tang’s dilemma and other problems: Ethnification processes at some multicultural work places. Pragmatics 4.3: 315-336.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1998) Being ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group. In Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 151-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffman, Erving
    (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Charles
    (1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gumperz, John
    (1982)  Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gumperz, John (1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 453-471. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375.4.453
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.4.453 [Google Scholar]
  13. Halkowski, Timothy
    (1990) ‘Role’ as an interactional device. Social Problems37: 564-577. doi: 10.2307/800582
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800582 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hester, Stephen , and Peter Eglin
    (eds.) (1997) Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation Analysis. Boston: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Higgins, Christina
    (2004) Swahili-English bilingual conversation: A vehicle for the study of language ideology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  16. (2007) Constructing membership in the in-group: Affiliation and resistance among urban Tanzanians. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutchby, Ian , and Robin Wooffitt
    (1998) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koole, Tom , and Jan D. ten Thije
    (2001) The reconstruction of intercultural discourse: Methodological considerations. Journal of Pragmatics33: 571-587. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00035‑7
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00035-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kramsch, Claire
    (1993) Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobs-Huey, Lanita
    (2004) Remembering Chrissy: Engendering knowledge, difference, and power in women’s hair care narratives. Transforming Anthropology11: 30-42. doi: 10.1525/tran.2003.11.2.30
    https://doi.org/10.1525/tran.2003.11.2.30 [Google Scholar]
  21. Labov, William
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lave, Jane , and Etienne Wenger
    (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lepper, Georgia
    (2000) Categories in Text and Talk. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208727
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208727 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lerner, Gene H
    (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text13: 213-245.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context free organization. Language in Society 32.2: 177-201. doi: 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  26. Marlaire, Courtney L. , and Douglas W. Maynard
    (1990) Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education63: 83-101. doi: 10.2307/2112856
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2112856 [Google Scholar]
  27. Maynard, Douglas W. , and Don H. Zimmerman
    (1984) Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychological Quarterly47.4: 301-316. doi: 10.2307/3033633
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3033633 [Google Scholar]
  28. Meeuwis, Michael
    (ed.) (1994) Critical perspectives on intercultural communication. Pragmatics4.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1994) Leniency and testiness in intercultural communication: Remarks on ideology an d context in intercultural sociolinguistics. Pragmatics 4.3: 391-408.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Moerman, Michael
    (1988) Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812200355
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200355 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mori, Junko , and Makoto Hayashi
    (2006) The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics27.2: 195-219. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml014 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nishizaka, Aug
    (1995) The interactive constitution of interculturality: How to be a Japanese with words. Human Studies18.2-3: 301-326. doi: 10.1007/BF01323214
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323214 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1999) Doing interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “henna gaijin” or “strange foreigner.”Human Studies22.2-4: 235-251. doi: 10.1023/A:1005492518477
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492518477 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ryoo, Hye-Kyung
    (2007) Interculturality serving multiple interactional goals in African American and Korean service encounters. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, Harvey
    (1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 325-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1992) Lectures on conversation,G. Jefferson(ed.)2 vols, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sarangi, Srikant
    (1994) Intercultural or not? Beyond celebration of cultural differences in miscommunication analysis. Pragmatics 4.3: 409-427.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1992) Introduction. In H. Sacks , Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2005) On integrity in inquiry… of the investigated, not the investigator. Discourse Studies7(405): 455-480. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054402 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shea, David P
    (1994) Perspective and production: Structuring conversational participation across cultural borders. Pragmatics4: 357-389.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sunaoshi, Yukako
    (2005) Historical context and intercultural communication: Interactions between Japanese and American factory workers in the American South. Language in Society 34.2: 185-217. doi: 10.1017/S0047404505050086
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050086 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tai, Eika
    (1996) Passing as a native in social interaction: Taiwanese in a changing Japanese society. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29.2: 97-123. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2902_1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2902_1 [Google Scholar]
  43. ten Have, Paul
    (1999) Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, Jean , and David Olsher
    (2000) Reflections on conversation analysis and nonnative speaker talk: An interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. Issues in Applied Linguistics11.1: 111-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zimmerman, Don H
    (1998) Discourse identities and social identities. In Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 87-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Zimmerman, Erica
    (2007) Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: Ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese. Pragmatics17: 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zuengler, Jane , and Barbara Bent
    (1991) Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native- nonnative conversations. Applied Linguistics12: 397-415. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.4.397
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.397 [Google Scholar]
  48. Koole, Tom , and Jan D. ten Thije
    (2001) The reconstruction of intercultural discourse: Methodological considerations. Journal of Pragmatics33: 571-587. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00035‑7
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00035-7 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kramsch, Claire
    (1993) Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Jacobs-Huey, Lanita
    (2004) Remembering Chrissy: Engendering knowledge, difference, and power in women’s hair care narratives. Transforming Anthropology11: 30-42. doi: 10.1525/tran.2003.11.2.30
    https://doi.org/10.1525/tran.2003.11.2.30 [Google Scholar]
  51. Labov, William
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lave, Jane , and Etienne Wenger
    (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lepper, Georgia
    (2000) Categories in Text and Talk. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208727
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208727 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lerner, Gene H
    (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text13: 213-245.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context free organization. Language in Society 32.2: 177-201. doi: 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  56. Marlaire, Courtney L. , and Douglas W. Maynard
    (1990) Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education63: 83-101. doi: 10.2307/2112856
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2112856 [Google Scholar]
  57. Maynard, Douglas W. , and Don H. Zimmerman
    (1984) Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychological Quarterly47.4: 301-316. doi: 10.2307/3033633
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3033633 [Google Scholar]
  58. Meeuwis, Michael
    (ed.) (1994) Critical perspectives on intercultural communication. Pragmatics4.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (1994) Leniency and testiness in intercultural communication: Remarks on ideology an d context in intercultural sociolinguistics. Pragmatics 4.3: 391-408.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Moerman, Michael
    (1988) Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812200355
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200355 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mori, Junko
    (2003) The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction36.2: 143-184. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mori, Junko , and Makoto Hayashi
    (2006) The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics27.2: 195-219. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml014 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nishizaka, Aug
    (1995) The interactive constitution of interculturality: How to be a Japanese with words. Human Studies18.2-3: 301-326. doi: 10.1007/BF01323214
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323214 [Google Scholar]
  64. (1999) Doing interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “henna gaijin” or “strange foreigner.”Human Studies22.2-4: 235-251. doi: 10.1023/A:1005492518477
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492518477 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ryoo, Hye-Kyung
    (2007) Interculturality serving multiple interactional goals in African American and Korean service encounters. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sacks, Harvey
    (1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 325-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. (1992) Lectures on conversation, G. Jefferson(ed.)2 vols, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sarangi, Srikant
    (1994) Intercultural or not? Beyond celebration of cultural differences in miscommunication analysis. Pragmatics 4.3: 409-427.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1992) Introduction. In H. Sacks , Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. (2005) On integrity in inquiry… of the investigated, not the investigator. Discourse Studies7(405): 455-480. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054402 [Google Scholar]
  71. Shea, David P
    (1994) Perspective and production: Structuring conversational participation across cultural borders. Pragmatics4: 357-389.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sunaoshi, Yukako
    (2005) Historical context and intercultural communication: Interactions between Japanese and American factory workers in the American South. Language in Society 34.2: 185-217. doi: 10.1017/S0047404505050086
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050086 [Google Scholar]
  73. Tai, Eika
    (1996) Passing as a native in social interaction: Taiwanese in a changing Japanese society. Research on Language and Social Interaction29.2: 97-123. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2902_1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2902_1 [Google Scholar]
  74. ten Have, Paul
    (1999) Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Wong, Jean , and David Olsher
    (2000) Reflections on conversation analysis and nonnative speaker talk: An interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. Issues in Applied Linguistics11.1: 111-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Zimmerman, Don H
    (1998) Discourse identities and social identities. In Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 87-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Zimmerman, Erica
    (2007) Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: Ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese. Pragmatics17:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Zuengler, Jane , and Barbara Bent
    (1991) Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native- nonnative conversations. Applied Linguistics12: 397-415. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.4.397
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.397 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17.1.06mor
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error