Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


The article discusses humorous conversational activities ((e.g. jokes, teasing, joint fantasizing) in the context of genre theory. The high degree of creativity, emergent construction and artistry typical of humor call for a flexible concept of genre which makes sense of modifications and transgressions in communicative processes. Some forms of conversational humor are generic, for example, standardized jokes, joint fantasizing or teasing. Other forms exploit our knowledge of serious genres and activity types (thereby relying on it): e.g. humorous stories about problems, humorous gossiping or counseling. Here the keying is done from the start in such a way that a serious mode of understanding is undermined. Generic boundaries are often transgressed and hybridized in joking; new sub-types arise, such as absurd meta-jokes which violate the well-known expectation of a punch-line or other features of the genre. Nevertheless, the realizations of these genres are related only by a sort of family resemblance. The concept of intertextuality plays another important role in analyzing oral genres of humor. Genre knowledge is also employed when the speakers violate expected patterns in such a way that further information is located precisely in the violation. The article shows humorous co-construction as an emergent phenomenon, which plays with genre knowledge.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Attardo, Salvatore
    (1994) Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter J.C
    (1986) Kontextualisierung. Studium Linguistik19: 22-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer, Peter
    (2005) Syntax als Prozess. In List 41 URL
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail, M
    (1986/1994) Speech genres. In Pam Morris (ed.), The Bakhtin Reader. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 80-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bange, Pierre
    (1986) Fiktion im Gespräch. In Werner Kallmeyer (ed.), Kommunikationstypologie. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp. 117-153.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbour, Stephen , and Patrick Stevenson
    (1999) Variation in German. A critical approach to German sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bateson, Gregory
    (1953) The position of humor in human communication. In H. von Forster (ed.), Cybernetics Ninth Conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, pp. 1-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1954) A theory of play and phantasy. InSteps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco: Chandler, pp. 177-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhatia, Vijay
    (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergmann, Jörg R
    (1987/1993) Discrete Indiscretions. The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berkenkotter, Carol , and Thomas N. Huckin
    (1995) Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Briggs, Charles , and Richard Bauman
    (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2.2: 131-172. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brünner, Gisela
    (1991) Redewiedergabe in Gesprächen. Deutsche Sprache1: 1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark, Herbert
    (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2004) Pragmatics of language performance. In Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. London: Blackwell, pp. 365-383.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    (1999) Coherent voicing. On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz , et al (eds), Coherence in Spoken and written Discourse, pp. 11-35. (also published as InList-paper 1) doi: 10.1075/pbns.63.05cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.05cou [Google Scholar]
  17. Coupland, Nikolas
    (2001) Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society 30.3: 345-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Drew, Paul
    (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics25: 219-253. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eder, Donna
    (1993) "Go get ya a French!": Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ehmer, Oliver
    (2004) Spontane Inszenierungen in Alltagsgesprächen. Diplomarbeit, Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
  21. Eisenberg, Ann R
    (1986) Teasing: Verbal play in Mexican homes. In Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs (eds.), Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-199.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Foley, William A
    (1997) Anthropological Linguistics. An Introduction. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Glenn, Phillip
    (2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goffman, Erving
    (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Günthner, Susanne
    (1996) Zwischen Scherz und Schmerz. Frotzelaktivitäten im Alltag. In Helga Kotthoff (ed.), Scherzkommunikation. Beiträge aus der empirischen Gesprächsforschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 81-109.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1999) Polyphony and the 'layering of voices' in reported dialogue: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics31: 685-708. (also published as InList-paper 3) doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Günthner, Susanne , and Hubert Knoblauch
    (1995) Culturally patterned speaking practices - the analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics5.1: 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gumperz, John J
    (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haiman, John
    (1990) Sarcasm as theater. Cognitive Linguistics1-2: 181-205. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.2.181
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hanks, William
    (1995) Language and Communicative Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Iser, Wolfgang
    (1992) Staging as an anthropological category. New Literary History 23.4: 877-888. doi: 10.2307/469175
    https://doi.org/10.2307/469175 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jakobson, Roman
    (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 350-377.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jefferson, Gail
    (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Max Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-269.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1985) An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol 3. London: Academic Press, pp. 25-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Knoblauch, Hubert , and Helga Kotthoff
    (2002) (eds.)Verbal Art across Cultures. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Koestler, Arthur
    (1964) The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson. (Dt. 1966): Der göttliche Funke. Bern/München/Wien: Scherz.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kotthoff, Helga
    (1996) Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia LinguisticaXXX.3-4: 299-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1998) Spaß Verstehen. Zur Pragmatik von konversationellem Humor. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002) Irony, citation, and other forms of staged intertextuality. In Carl F. Graumann and Werner Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspectivity in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.201-233. (also published as InList-paper 5). doi: 10.1075/hcp.9.13kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.9.13kot [Google Scholar]
  40. (2005) Artistische Dimensionen der Alltagsrede. Performanzorientierte Mündlichkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Muttersprache, Vierteljahresschrift für deutsche Sprache, Jahrgang115: 320-338.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2006a) Humor and gender. The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics 1(vol. 38): 4-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2006b) Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor19-3: 271-304. doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2007) The humorous stylization of “new” women and men and conservative others. In Peter Auer (ed.) Variation and social identity. New York/Berlin: de Gruyter (forthcoming)
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Muntigl, Peter , and Helmut Gruber
    (2005) Introduction: Approaches to genre. Folia LinguisticsXXXIX.1-2: 1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lampert, Martin D. , and Susan M. Ervin-Tripp
    (2006) Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics 1.(vol. 38): 51-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Legman, Gershon
    (1970) Der unanständige Witz. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Luckmann, Thomas
    (1986) Grundformen der gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung des Wissens: Kom-munikative Gattungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie27: 513-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Luckmann
    (2002) Kommunikation. In Thomas Luckmann, Wissen und Gesellschaft. Ausgewählte Aufsätze 1981-2002. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, pp. 157-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Norrick, Neal R
    (1993) Conversational Joking. Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2000) Conversational Narrative. Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.203
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  51. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R
    (1940) On joking relationships. InStructure and Function in Primitive Society. (1965). New York/London: Cohen/West, pp. 90-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sacks, Harvey
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-353.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 249-275. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50017-3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schmitt, Reinhold
    (1992) Die Schwellensteher. Sprachliche Präsenz und sozialer Austausch an einem Kiosk. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sperber, Dan , and Deirdre Wilson
    (1985) Relevance. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Straehle, Carolyn A
    (1993) "Samuel?" "Yes, Dear?": Teasing and conversational rapport. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Swales, John M
    (1990) Genre Analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Voloshinov, Valentin N
    (1929/1975) Marxismus und Sprachphilosophie. Frankfurt/Berlin/Wien: Ull-stein.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error