1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper presents an ethnographically sensitive account of a family of modal constructions in Sakapultek, a Mayan language spoken in highland Guatemala. The constructions in question share many characteristics with those that have been analyzed as ironic in English and are dubbed “moral irony,” due both to their similarities to irony in other languages and to their primary interactional function. The morphosyntactic composition and semiotic processes involved in moral irony are described and the proposed account of these semiotic properties makes use of Goffman’s distinction between author, animator and principal as dimensions of the speaker role. The indexical properties of moral irony are demonstrated and it is argued that they play a greater role in determining ironic meaning than speaker intentions. Using extended examples from naturally-occurring talk, the paper also demonstrates how irony functions in evaluative stance-taking in Sakapultek. Such examples illustrate both the relatively presupposing and entailing aspects of moral irony’s indexical meaning. Moral irony is argued to be modal in that it projects hypothetical or unreal possible worlds and ironic in that it indirectly and negatively evaluates the stances of an imagined principal. Finally, on the ethnographic level, moral irony is examined in light of what it reveals about Sakapultek notions of moral personhood.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17.2.05sho
2007-01-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    (1981) The dialogic imagination. C. Emerson and M. Holquist , trans., Michael Holquist , ed.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Richard
    (1983) Let your words be few: Symbolism of speaking and silence among Seventeenth Century Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenneis, Donald
    (1986) Shared territory: Audience, indirection and meaning. Text 6: 339-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brody, Jill
    (1991) Indirection in the negotiation of self in everyday Tojolab'al women's conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1.1: 78-97. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1991.1.1.78
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1991.1.1.78 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope
    (1990) Gender, politeness and confrontation in Tenejapa. Discourse Processes13: 121-141. doi: 10.1080/01638539009544749
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544749 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: The case of Tzeltal irony. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153-174. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.010 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2002) Everyone has to lie in Tzeltal. In S. Blum-Kulka and C. Snow (eds.), Talking to adults The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, pp. 241-275.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan
    (1998) Irrealis as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40.2: 257-271.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cancian, Frank
    (1965) Economics and prestige in a Maya community: The religious cargo system in Zinacantán. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chance, John , and William Taylor
    (1985)  Cofradias and cargos: A historical perspective on the Mesoamerican civil-religious hierarchy. American Ethnologist12.1: 1-26. doi: 10.1525/ae.1985.12.1.02a00010
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1985.12.1.02a00010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clift, Rebecca
    (1999) Irony in conversation. Language in Society28: 523-553. doi: 10.1017/S0047404599004029
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599004029 [Google Scholar]
  13. Colston, Herbert L
    (1997) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes 23.1: 25-45. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544980
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dews, Shelly , Joan Kaplan , and Ellen Winner
    (1995) Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes19.3: 347-367. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544922
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544922 [Google Scholar]
  15. Du Bois, John
    (1981) The Sacapultec language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley. ProQuest accession number AAT 8211912.
  16. Du Bois, John , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cumming , and Danae Paolino
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards and M. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1985) Famous theories and local theories: The Samoans and Wittgenstein. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 7.2: 46-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1992) Intentions, self and responsibility. In J. Hill and J. Irvine , (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eisterhold, Jodi , Salvatore Attardo , and Diana Boxer
    (2006) Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics38.8: 1239-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.007
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Giora, Rachel
    (1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Processes19: 239-264. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544916
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544916 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2002) Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics34: 487-506. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00045‑5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00045-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goffman, Erving
    (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldberg, Adele
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Grice, Paul
    (1989) Meaning revisited. InStudies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 283-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haiman, John
    (1989) Alienation in grammar. Studies in Language13: 129-70. doi: 10.1075/sl.13.1.05hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.05hai [Google Scholar]
  27. (1998) Talk is cheap, sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Herzfeld, Michael
    (2001) Irony and power: Toward a politics of mockery in Greece. In J. Fernandez and M. Huber (eds.), Irony in action: Anthropology, practice and the moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jakobson, Roman
    (1971) Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In L. Waugh and M. Monville-Burston (eds.), On language: Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 386-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaufman, Terrence
    (1975) New Mayan languages in Guatemala: Sacapultec, Sipacapa, and others. In M. McClaran (ed.), Mayan linguistics, vol. 1. Los Angeles: University of California, American Indian Studies Center, pp. 67-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1976) Proyecto de alfabetos y ortografias para escribir las lenguas mayanses. Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Keane, Webb
    (2002) Sincerity, “modernity,” and the Protestants. Cultural Anthropology1: 65-92. doi: 10.1525/can.2002.17.1.65
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2002.17.1.65 [Google Scholar]
  33. Keenan, Elinor Ochs
    (1976) The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society5.1: 67-80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006850
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006850 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kockelman, Paul
    (2002) Subjectivity as stance under neoliberal governance: Language and labor, mind and measure, among the Q’eqchi’-Maya. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Chicago. ProQuest accession number AAT 3060226.
  35. (2005) Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14.2: 127-150. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127 [Google Scholar]
  36. König, Ekkehard
    (1991) The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203212288
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203212288 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kotthoff, Helga
    (2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35.9: 1387-1411. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00182‑0
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kulick, Don , and Bambi Schieffelin
    (2004) Language socialization. In A. Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 349-368.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, Benjamin
    (1997) Talking heads: Language, metalanguage and the semiotics of subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822382461
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822382461 [Google Scholar]
  40. Matthews, Jacqueline , Jeffrey Hancock , and Philip Dunham
    (2006) The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes41.1: 3-24. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_2
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101_2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mauss, Marcel
    (1985) A category of the human mind: The notion of person, the notion of self. In M. Carrithers , et al . (eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mithun, Marianne
    (1995) On the relativity of irreality. In J. Bybee and S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 367-388. doi: 10.1075/tsl.32.16mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.16mit [Google Scholar]
  43. Refaie, Elisabeth
    (2005) ‘Our purebred ethnic compatriots’: Irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics 37.6: 781-797. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.017
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosaldo, Michelle
    (1982) The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society11: 203-237. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500009209
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009209 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1984) Toward an anthropology of self and feeling. In R. Shweder and R. Levine (eds.), Culture theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Scheibman, Joanne
    (2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.11
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.11 [Google Scholar]
  47. Searle, John
    (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  48. (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1991) Metaphor. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford & N.Y.: Oxford University Press, pp. 519-539.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shoaps, Robin
    (1999) The many voices of Rush Limbaugh: The use of transposition in constructing a rhetoric of common sense. Text 19.3: 399-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2002) “Pray earnestly:” The textual construction of personal involvement in Pentecostal prayer and song. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12.1: 34-71. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2002.12.1.34
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.1.34 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2004a) Conditionals and moral reasoning in Sakapultek discourse. Paper presented atthe joint meeting of the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the Americas and the Linguistic Society of America, January9 2004, Boston, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2004b) Morality in grammar and discourse: Evaluative stance-taking and the negotiation of moral personhood in Sakapultek Mayan wedding counsels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara. ProQuest accession number AAT 3145760.
  54. Silverstein, Michael
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sperber, Dan
    (1984) Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113: 130-36. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.130
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.130 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sperber, Dan , and Deidre Wilson
    (1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 295-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Taylor, Charles
    (1989) Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Traugott, Elizabeth
    (1995) Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31-54. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  59. Watanabe, John
    (1992) Mayan saints and souls in a changing world. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Whorf, Benjamin Lee
    (1956) The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. Carroll (ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 134-159.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilson, Deidre , and Dan Sperber
    (1992) On verbal irony. Lingua87: 53-76. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90025‑E
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17.2.05sho
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Footing , Irony , Mayan languages , Modality , Personhood and Stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error