1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 28, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF

Abstract

This paper extends the concept of local grammar to speech act studies, focusing specifically on apologising in English. It aims primarily to demonstrate the usefulness of a local grammar approach to account for speech acts and ultimately to contribute to the on-going development of corpus pragmatics. Apology expressions in a corpus of scripted TV conversations are first automatically extracted and then manually examined in order to make sure that all remaining instances have the illocutionary force of apologising and thus qualify for further analysis. The subsequent local grammar analyses facilitate the establishment of a local grammar of apology, comprising 14 local grammar patterns. The analyses show that it is promising to develop a set of local grammars to account more adequately for speech acts in general. The relationship between local grammars, functional grammars, and general grammars is further discussed, which suggests that local grammars can be an alternative approach to functional-pragmatic studies of language and discourse. Directions for future research are outlined; and implications and applications are briefly discussed.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su
2018-08-27
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.17005.su.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Achiba, Machiko
    2003 Learning to Request in a Second Language: A Study of Child Interlanguage Pragmatics. Toronto & Sydney: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolphs, Svenja
    2008 Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.30
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.30 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aijmer, Karin
    1996 Conversational Routines in English. London & New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Gahtani, Saad , and Carsten Roever
    2012 “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics33 (1): 42–65.10.1093/applin/amr031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin, John
    1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , Majid KhosraviNik , Michal Krzyzanowski , Tony McEnery , and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306.10.1177/0957926508088962
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnbrook, Geoff
    1995 “The Language of Definition.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  8. 2002 Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.11
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.11 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnbrook, Geoff , and John Sinclair
    1995 “Parsing Cobuild Entries.” InThe Language of Definition: The Formalization of Dictionary Definitions for Natural Language Processing, ed. by John Sinclair , Martin Hoelter , and Carol Peters , 13–58. Luxemburg: European Commission.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2001 “Specialised Corpus, Local and Functional Grammars.” InSmall Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, ed. by Mohsen Ghadessy , Alex Henry , and Robert Roseberry , 237–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.5.15bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.5.15bar [Google Scholar]
  11. Bednarek, Monika
    2008 Emotion Talk Across Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230285712
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bella, Spyridoula
    2014 “A Contrastive Study of Apologies Performed by Greek Native Speakers and English Learners of Greek as a Foreign Language.” Pragmatics24 (4): 679–713.10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel [Google Scholar]
  13. Bloom, Kenneth
    2011 “Sentiment Analysis Based on Appraisal Theory and Functional Local Grammar.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, US.
  14. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , Juliane House , and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds.) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brezina, Vaclav
    2011 “Epistemic Markers in University Advisory Sessions: Towards a Local Grammar of Epistemicity.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  16. Brown, Gillian , and George Yule
    1982 Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Butler, Christopher
    2004 “Corpus Studies and Functional Linguistic Theories.” Functions of Language11 (2): 147–186.10.1075/fol.11.2.02but
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.02but [Google Scholar]
  18. Charrow, Veda. R. , Jo Ann Crandall , and Robert P. Charrow
    1982 “Characteristics and Functions of Legal Language.” InSublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Domains, ed. by Richard Kittredge , and John Lehrberger , 175–190. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng, Dongmei
    2017 ““Communication is a Two-Way Street”: Instructors’ Perceptions of Student Apologies.” Pragmatics27 (1): 1–32.10.1075/prag.27.1.01che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.01che [Google Scholar]
  20. Cheng, Stephanie
    2010 “A Corpus-Based Approach to the Study of Speech Act of Thanking.” Concentric: Studies in Linguistics36 (2): 257–274.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deutschmann, Mats
    2003 “Apologising in British English.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
  22. Drew, Paul , Alexa Hepburn , Piera Margutti , and Renata Galatolo
    (eds) 2016 “Special Issue on Apologies in Discourse.” Discourse Processes53 (1–2): 1–131.10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056689
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056689 [Google Scholar]
  23. Flöck, Ilka , and Ronald Geluykens
    2015 “Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse.” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo , 7–37. Heidelberg: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia, Paula
    2015 “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbooked. by Karin Aijmer , and Christoph Rühlemann , 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Geis, Michael L.
    1995 Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554452
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554452 [Google Scholar]
  26. Goffman, Erving
    1971 Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. London: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gross, Maurice
    1993 “Local Grammars and Their Representation by Finite Automata.” InData, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Michael Hoey , 26–38. London: HarperCollins.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2006 “Afterwords.” InSystem and Corpus: Exploring Connections, ed. by Geoff Thompson , and Susan Hunston , 293–299. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2008 Complementarities in Language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Halliday, Michael A. K. , and Christian Matthiessen
    2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hanks, Patrick
    2013 Lexical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Harris, Zellig
    1968 Mathematical Structures of Languages. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Holmes, Janet
    1990 “Apologies in New Zealand English.” Language in Society19 (2): 155–199.10.1017/S0047404500014366
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014366 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hunston, Susan
    2002 “Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching, and Linguistic Variation: Applications of a Corpus-Driven Grammar.” InUsing Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, ed. by Randi Reppen , Susan Fitzmaurice , and Doug Biber , 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.9.11hun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.11hun [Google Scholar]
  35. 2003 “Frame, Phrase or Function: A Comparison of Frame Semantics and Local Grammars.” InCorpus Linguistics 2003, ed. by Dawn Archer , Paul Rayson , Andrew Wilson , and Tony McEnery , 342–358. University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language, University of Lancaster, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2011 Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hunston, Susan , and Geoff Thompson
    (eds) 2000 Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hunston, Susan , and Gill Francis
    1998 “Verbs Observed: A Corpus-Driven Pedagogic Grammar.” Applied Linguistics19 (1): 45–72.10.1093/applin/19.1.45
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.45 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hunston, Susan , and John Sinclair
    2000 “A Local Grammar of Evaluation.” InEvaluation in Text, ed. by Susan Hunston , and Geoff Thompson , 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hunston, Susan, and Hang Su
    2017 “Patterns, Constructions and Local Grammar: A Case Study of Evaluation.” Applied Linguistics1–28. doi: 10.1093/applin/amx046
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx046 [Google Scholar]
  42. Jautz, Sabine
    2013 Thanking Formulae in English: Explorations Across Varieties and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.230
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.230 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jucker, Andreas , and Irma Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Andreas Jucker , and Irma Taavitsainen , 229–443. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  44. Kilgarriff, Adam , Pavel Rychlý , Pavel Smrz , and David Tugwell
    2004 “The Sketch Engine.” InProceedings of EURALEX 2004, ed. by Geoffrey Williams , and Sandra Vessier , 105–116. Retrieved from: euralex.org/publications/the-sketch-engine/.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kittredge, Richard , and John Lehrberger
    (eds) 1982 Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Domains. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110844818
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110844818 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 “Tracing Directives Through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Andreas Jucker , and Irma Taavitsainen , 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  47. Kondo, Sachiko
    2010 “Apologies: Raising Learners’ Cross-Cultural Awareness.” InSpeech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Alicia Martinez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 145–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.26.09kon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.09kon [Google Scholar]
  48. Lutzky, Ursula , and Andrew Kehoe
    2017a “Oops, I didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data.” Journal of Pragmatics116: 27–36.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2017b “ I Apologise for My Poor Blogging: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus.” Corpus Pragmatics1 (1): 37–56.10.1007/s41701‑017‑0004‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0004-0 [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin, Jim , and Peter White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mason, Oliver
    2004 “Automatic Processing of Local Grammar Patterns.” InProceedings of the 7th Annual Colloquium for the UK Special Interest Group for Computational Linguistics, ed. by Mark Lee , 166–171. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. McEnery, Tony , and Andrew Hardie
    2012 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Page, Ruth
    2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics62: 30–45.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pearson, Jennifer
    1998 Terms in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Quaglio, Paulo
    2009 Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.36
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rey, Jennifer M.
    2001 “Changing Gender Roles in Popular Culture: Dialogue in Star Trek Episodes from 1966 to 1993.” InVariation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, ed. by Susan Conrad , and Doug Biber , 138–155. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rühlemann, Christoph
    2011 “Corpus-Based Pragmatics II: Quantitative Studies.” InFoundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz , and Neal R. Norrick , 629–656. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214260.629
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260.629 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rühlemann, Christoph , and Karin Aijmer
    2015 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer , and Christoph Rühlemann , 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139057493.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  60. 1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society5: 1–23.10.1017/S0047404500006837
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sinclair, John
    1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 2004 Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 2010 “Defining the Definiendum.” InA Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis, ed. by Gilles-Maurice de Schryver , 37–47. Kampala: Menha Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Stubbs, Michael
    2014 “Searle and Sinclair on Communicative Acts: A Sketch of a Research Problem.” InThe Functional Perspectives on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications, ed. by María de los Ángeles Gómez González , Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez , Francisco Gonzálvez García , and Angela Downing , 243–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.247.13stu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.13stu [Google Scholar]
  65. Su, Hang
    2015 “Judgement and Adjective Complementation Patterns: A Corpus Study.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  66. 2017 “Local Grammars of Speech Acts: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Pragmatics111: 72–83.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  67. Su, Hang
    2018 “Thank Bloody God it’s Friday: A Local Grammar of Thanking.” Corpus Pragmatics2(1): 83–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Taavitsainen, Irma , and Andreas Jucker
    2008 “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Andreas Jucker , and Irma Taavitsainen , 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.02taa [Google Scholar]
  69. Trosborg, Anna
    1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110885286
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  70. Usó-Juan, Esther
    2010 “Requests: A Sociopragmatic Approach.” InSpeech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Alicia Martinez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.26.14uso
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.14uso [Google Scholar]
  71. Vanderveken, Daniel
    2001 “Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory.” InEssays in Speech Act Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken , and Susumu Kubo , 25–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.77.03van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.77.03van [Google Scholar]
  72. Warren, Martin , and Maggie Leung
    2016 “Do Collocational Frameworks Have Local Grammars?” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics21 (1): 1–27.10.1075/ijcl.21.1.01war
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.1.01war [Google Scholar]
  73. Wichmann, Anne
    2004 “The Intonation of Please-Requests: A Corpus-Based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics36: 1521–1549.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su
Loading
“I’m really sorry about what I said”
Pragmatics 28, 439 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17005.su
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17005.su
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): apology; corpus linguistics; corpus pragmatics; local grammar; speech acts

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error