Volume 31, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238



The goal of this study is to propose a pragmatic analysis of what we call (ETTs) in Korean, compared to English. What makes Korean taste adjectives special is its multidimensional meaning: In descriptive dimension, (i) the literal meaning concerns the taste; or (ii) it can be extended toward the situation, yielding a figurative meaning. In expressive dimension, (iii) the choice of particular derivation form reflects the speaker’s positive or negative emotional attitude; and (iv) another potential expressive meaning concerns honorification, thought it is not part of the meaning of ETTs. We thus propose that ETTs are a novel subcase of elements, triggering . We show how the analysis of ETTs as a CI allows us to successfully derive subtle connotational differences amongst numerous variants. Finally, we show how the co-occurrence pattern of multiple expressives, ETTs and other expressives, within the sentence can be captured by .


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay
    1969Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Choe, Jae-Woong
    2004 “Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature.” Studies in Generative Grammar14, 545–559.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language
    Dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language 2008 National Institute of Korean Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
    2010 “Information Structure and Discourse Stance in a Monologic “Public Speaking” Register of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 1890–1911. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Giannakidou, Anastasia and Suwon Yoon
    2009 “Metalinguistic Functions and the Expressive Dimension in Greek and Korean: Attitude Semantics, Expressive Meaning and NPI Licensing.” InProceedings of the 13th Sinn und Bedeutung, ed. byL. Geist, K. von Heusinger, H. Kamp, U. Klein, F. Martin, E. Onea, A. Riester, and T. Solstad, 141–156. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart (OPUS).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 “The Subjective Mode of Comparison: Metalinguistic Comparatives in Greek and Korean.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29 (3): 621–655. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9133‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9133-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginatulin, Laman M.
    1972 “The Semantics of Words and Sense Organs.” Foreign Philology, 1. Ama-Ata.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gutzmann, Daniel and Katharina Turgay
    2012 “Expressive Intensifiers in German: Syntaxsemantics Mismatches.” InEmpirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics9. ed. byC. Piñón, 149–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jeong, Su-Jin
    2012 “A Cognitive Analysis of the Meaning Extension of Sensual Nouns in Korean.” Hanmincokemwunhak60: 271–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Joe, Jieun and Chungmin Lee
    2002 “A ‘Removal’ Type of Negative Predicates.” InProceedings of the 10th Japanese Korean Linguistics Conference. CSLI Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kennedy, Christopher and Louise McNally
    2010 “Taste, Context and Compositionality.” Synthese174 (1): 79–98. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9685‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9685-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, Hae-Mi
    2009 A Study on the Semantic Schema and Extension Principle of Taste Adjectives. MA thesis. Chonbuk National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Jong-Bok and Peter Sells
    2007 “Korean Honorification: A Kind of Expressive Meaning.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics Journal16: 303–336. 10.1007/s10831‑007‑9014‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-007-9014-4 [Google Scholar]
  14. McCready, Eric
    2004 “Two Japanese Adverbials and Expressive Content.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory14: 163–178. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2910
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2910 [Google Scholar]
  15. Potts, Christopher
    2005The Logic of Conventional Implicature. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007a “The Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics33: 165–197. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007b The dimensions of quotation. InDirect compositionality, ed.C. Barker, P. Jacobson, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Potts, Christopher and Shigeto Kawahara
    2004 “Japanese Honorifics as Emotive Definite Descriptions.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory14: 235–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yae, James and Suwon Yoon
    2017 “Compatibility Condition for Expressives Revisited: a Big Data-based Trend Analysis.” Language Sciences64: 69–102. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon, Hyejoon
    2012 “A Comparative Study on the Meaning Shift and Meaning Extension of Taste-terms, Focused on Sweet-taste Adjectives in Korean, German and English.” Language Information15: 115–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoon, Suwon
    2011 ‘Not’ in the Mood: the Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics of Evaluative Negation. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013 “Parametric Variation in Subordinate Evaluative Negation: Japanese/Korean vs. Others.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics22 (2): 133–166. 10.1007/s10831‑012‑9100‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9100-0 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2015 “Semantic Constraint and Pragmatic Nonconformity for Expressives: Compatibility Condition on Slurs, Epithets, Anti-honorifics, Intensifiers, and Mitigators.” Special issue on Slurs atLanguage Sciences52: 46–69. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.009 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error