oa The multimodal enactment of deontic and epistemic authority in Indian meetings

References

1. Angouri, Jo , and Meredith Marra
   2010 “Corporate Meetings as Genre: A Study of the Role of the Chair in Corporate Meeting Talk.” Text & Talk30 (6): 615–636.10.1515/text.2010.030
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.030 [Google Scholar]
2. Asmuβ, Birte , and Jan Svennevig
   2009 “Meeting Talk: An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication46 (1): 3–22.10.1177/0021943608326761
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608326761 [Google Scholar]
3. Barske, Tobias
   2009 “Same Token, Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles, Embodied Actions, and ok in German Business Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication46 (1): 120–149.10.1177/0021943608325748
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608325748 [Google Scholar]
4. Bhatnagar, Jyotsna
   2005 “The Power of Psychological Empowerment as an Antecedent to Organizational Commitment in Indian Managers.” Human Resource Development International8 (4): 419–433. doi: 10.1080/13678860500356101.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500356101 [Google Scholar]
5. Craven, Alexandra , and Jonathan Potter
   2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies12 (4): 419–442. doi: 10.1177/1461445610370126.
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126 [Google Scholar]
6. Deppermann, Arnulf , Reinhold Schmitt , and Lorenza Mondada
   2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1700–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006 [Google Scholar]
7. Drew, Paul
   1991 “Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions.” InAsymmetries in Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Markova , and Klaus Foppa , 29–48. Hemel Hempstead UK: Harvester.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gee, James Paul , Glynda Hull , and Colin Lankshear
   1996 The New Work Order. London: Saint Leonards Allen and Unwin.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goodwin, Charles
   1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goodwin, Charles
    2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics32 (10): 1489–1522.10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
11. Griswold, Olga
    2007 “Achieving Authority: Discursive Practices in Russian Girls’ Pretend Play.” Research on Language and Social Interaction40 (4): 291–319. doi: 10.1080/08351810701471286.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471286 [Google Scholar]
12. Gumperz, John J.
    1982 Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
13. Heath, Christian , and Paul Luff
    2013 “Embodied Action and Organizational Activity.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 283–307. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, John
    2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (1): 30–52.10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
15. Heritage, John
    2013 “Epistemics in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 370–394. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
17. Kahn, William A. , and Kathy E. Kram
    1994 “Authority at Work: Internal Models and Their Organizational Consequences.” The Academy of Management Review19 (1): 17–50. doi: 10.2307/258834.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/258834 [Google Scholar]
18. Kakar, Sudhir
    1971 Authority Patterns and Subordinate Behavior in Indian Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly16 (3): 298–307.10.2307/2391902
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2391902 [Google Scholar]
19. Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby , Pål Gulbrandsen , and Jan Svennevig
    2015 “Whose Decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in Medical Treatment Decisions.” Journal of Pragmatics78: 54–69. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007 [Google Scholar]
20. Larrue, Janine , and Alain Trognon
    1993 “Organization of Turn-taking and Mechanisms for Turn-taking Repairs in a Chaired Meeting”. Journal of Pragmatics19 (2): 177–196.10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90087‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90087-6 [Google Scholar]
21. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1992 “Activity Types and Language.” InTalk at work – Interaction in institutional settings (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 8), ed. by Paul Drew , and John Heritage , 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lukes, Steven
    1978 “Power and Authority.” InA History of Sociological Analysis, ed. by Thomas B. Bottomore , and Robert A. Nisbet , 633–676. London: Heineman.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mondada, Lorenza
    . n.d.Conventions for multimodal transcription. Available online at: https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf. Last consulted on10 January 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mondada, Lorenza
    2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics20 (3): 336–366.10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
25. Peräkylä, Anssi
    2011 “Validity in Research on Naturally Occurring Interaction.” InQualitative Research, ed. by David Silverman , 365–382. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling “how I know”.” Journal of Pragmatics8 (2): 607–625.10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90002‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-X [Google Scholar]
27. Pomerantz, Anita , and Paul Denvir
    2007 “Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority”. InInteracting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting, ed. by François Cooren , 31–51. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2000 “The Voice of Authority: The Local Accomplishment of Authoritative Discourse in Live News Broadcasts.” Discourse Studies2 (3): 354–37910.1177/1461445600002003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002003005 [Google Scholar]
29. Raymond, Geoffrey , and John Heritage
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society35 (5): 677–705. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060325.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation (2vols, edited by Gail Jefferson with introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff ). Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn taking for Conversation”. Language50 (4): 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
32. Sinha, Jai B. P. , and D. Sinha
    1990 “Role of Social Values in Indian Organizations.” International Journal of Psychology25 (3–6): 705–714.10.1080/00207599008247922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247922 [Google Scholar]
33. Stevanovic, Melisa
    2013 Deontic Rights in Interaction: A Conversation Analytic Study on Authority and Cooperation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Stevanovic, Melisa
    2015 “Displays of Uncertainty and Proximal Deontic Claims: The Case of Proposal Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics78: 84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (3): 297–321. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
36. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations”. Language in Society43 (2): 185–207.10.1017/S0047404514000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
37. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Jan Svennevig
    2015 Introduction: Epistemics and Deontics in Conversational Directives. Journal of Pragmatics78: 1–6.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008 [Google Scholar]
38. Stivers, Tanja
    2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction41 (1): 31–57.10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
39. Svennevig, Jan
    2012 “The Agenda as Resource for Topic Introduction in Workplace Meetings”. Discourse Studies14 (1): 53–66.10.1177/1461445611427204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427204 [Google Scholar]
40. Taylor, Frederick
    1911 Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Taylor, James
    2009 “The Communicative Construction of Community: Authority and Organizing.” InLearning and expanding with activity theory, ed. by Annalisa Sannino , Harry Daniels , and Kris D. Gutiérrez , 228–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809989.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.015 [Google Scholar]
42. Taylor, James
    2012 “L’autorité comme base normative de l’organisation [Authority as a normative base for organisations].” Proceedings of the International Communication Association Regional conference in Europe – Communicating in a world of norms, available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00835844v2/document.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Taylor, James , and Elizabeth Van Every
    2014 When Organization Fails. Why Authority Matters. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Van De Mieroop, Dorien , and Jonathan Clifton
    2017 “Corporate settings.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, ed. by Bernadette Vine , 127–137. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Van De Mieroop, Dorien , and Stephanie Schnurr
    (eds) 2017 Identity struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.69
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69 [Google Scholar]
46. Varma, Arup , Ekkirala S. Srinivas , and Linda K. Stroh
    2005 “A Comparative Study of the Impact of Leader-Member Exchange in US and Indian Samples.” Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal12 (1): 84–95. doi: 10.1108/13527600510797971.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600510797971 [Google Scholar]
47. Verschueren, Jef
    2008 “Intercultural Communication and the Challenges of Migration.” Language and intercultural communication8 (1): 21–35.10.2167/laic298.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/laic298.0 [Google Scholar]
48. Weber, Max
    1978 Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]