1887
Volume 28, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Abstract

Negative existentials containing empty NPs are understood colloquially as representing how things stand in the world. Moreover, utterances of such sentences seem to express propositions or thoughts that are informative and true. Standard static semantic theories cannot provide a straightforward account of these intuitive phenomena. In such frameworks, sentences with empty NPs are considered as being unable to express truth-evaluable contents. This paper investigates two alternative theories of negative existentials. A common feature of these theories is that they adopt a dynamic approach to meaning. I will argue that neither of these alternatives provides a reassuring solution to the apparent truth-conditional problem generated by the utterances of negative existentials.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17026.vec
2018-10-23
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.17026.vec.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17026.vec&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams, Fred, and Laura L. Dietrich
    2004 “What’s in an (Empty) Name?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly85: 125–148. 10.1111/j.0279‑0750.2004.00191.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00191.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Beaver, David, and Elizabeth Coppock
    2015 “Definiteness and Determinacy.” Linguistics and Philosophy38: 377–435. 10.1007/s10988‑015‑9178‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9178-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, David
    2005 “Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names.” Nous39: 596–631. 10.1111/j.0029‑4624.2005.00541.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00541.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Clapp, Lenny
    2009 “The Problem of Negative Existentials does not Exist: A Case for Dynamic Semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1422–1434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.031
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.031 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gauker, Christopher
    2008 “Against Accommodation: Heim, Van Der Sandt, and the Presupposition Projection Problem.” Philosophical Perspectives22: 171–205. 10.1111/j.1520‑8583.2008.00145.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00145.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof
    2000 “Meaning in Motion.” InReference and Anaphoric Relations, ed. byK. von Heusinger, and U. Egli, 47–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3947‑2_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodman, Nelson
    1968Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanks, Peter
    2015Propositional Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684892.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684892.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Heim, Irene
    1982The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. Thesis, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kertész, András, and Csilla Rákosi
    2012Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kroon, Frederick
    2003 “Quantified Negative Existentials.” Dialectica57: 149–167. 10.1111/j.1746‑8361.2003.tb00262.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00262.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis, Karen
    2017 “Dynamic Semantics.” Oxford Handbooks Online. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.14
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Merricks, Trenton
    2015Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732563.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732563.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mousavian, Seyed N.
    2014 “Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism.” Thought3: 49–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pearson, Hazel
    2010 “Presupposition in Local Contexts: Why Global Accommodation is not Enough.” Language at the University of Essex (LangUE) 2009 Proceedings, 70–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Recanati, Francois
    2004Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts, Craige
    1995 “Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics.” InQuantification in Natural Languages, ed. byE. Bach et al., 661–700. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Salmon, Nathan
    1998 “Nonexistence.” Nous32: 277–319. 10.1111/0029‑4624.00101
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00101 [Google Scholar]
  19. Schlenker, Philippe
    2010 “Presuppositions and Local Contexts.” Mind119: 377–391. 10.1093/mind/fzq032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzq032 [Google Scholar]
  20. Simons, Mandy
    2003 “Presupposition and Accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian Picture.” Philosophical Studies112: 251–278. 10.1023/A:1023004203043
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023004203043 [Google Scholar]
  21. Spewak, David C.
    2016 “A Modulation Account of Negative Existentials.” Philosophia44: 227–245. 10.1007/s11406‑015‑9673‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9673-8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Stalnaker, Robert
    1978 “Assertion.” Syntax and Semantics9: 315–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645169.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645169.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomasson, Amie L.
    1999Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2003 “Speaking of Fictional Characters.” Dialectica57: 207–226. 10.1111/j.1746‑8361.2003.tb00266.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00266.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Yalcin, Seth
    2012 “Dynamic Semantics.” InThe Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. ed. byG. Russell, and D. Graff Fara, 253–279. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vecsey, Zoltán
    2015 “Fiction and Representation.” SATS16: 202–215. 10.1515/sats‑2015‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2015-0003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Walton, Kendall L.
    1990Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015In Other Shoes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wyatt, Nicole
    2007 “The Pragmatics of Empty Names.” Dialogue46: 663–81. 10.1017/S001221730000216X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730000216X [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17026.vec
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dynamic semantics , linguistic data , modulation , negative existentials , pragmatics and presupposition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error