Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


In recent cross-cultural studies of pragmatics, we have witnessed a rise in interest in the comparative study of phenomena beyond the level of single and decontextualised utterances encompassing those on the level of speech events such as casual conversations. The underlying premise for such studies is that different cultural groups may have different rules for participation in and interpretation of conversation X that conflicts related to these rules are a major source of cross-cultural miscommunication. This study examines the use of listener responses by Chinese speakers in Chinese Mandarin conversations and by Australians in Australian English conversations. Following X prior framework by Clancy et al. (1996), the study examines similarities and differences in the use of listener responses by these two groups of people in terms of frequency of use, types of listener responses, and the positions of listener responses with respect to transition relevance place. Results show that Australian and Chinese speakers do exhibit quite different conversational styles as evidenced in their use of listener responses. Specifically, while Australians use more listener responses, use a higher percentage of lexical expressions as their listener responses and tend to place their listener responses at a possible completion point, Chinese speakers use fewer listener responses, favour the use of paralinguistic vocalic forms as their listener responses and tend to place their listener responses during a turn. These findings may suggest a culture specific way of turn taking and of what it means to be polite in conversational behaviour.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Argyle, M. , M. Lalljee , & M. Cook
    (1968) The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations21.1: 3-17. doi: 10.1177/001872676802100101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676802100101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bales, R.F.
    (1950) Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavelas, J.B. , L. Coates , & T. Johnson
    (2002) Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication52.4: 566-580. doi: 10.1093/joc/52.2.467
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.2.467 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beach, W.A
    (1993) Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics19: 325-352. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90092‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1995) Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and ‘official’ priorities in medical interviews. In G. Morris & R. Cheneil (eds.), Talk of the clinic. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 259-289.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beach, W.A. , & A.K. Lindstrom
    (1992) Conversational universals and comparative theory: Turning to Swedish and American acknowledgement tokens-in-interaction. Communication Theory2: 24-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1992.tb00027.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00027.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett, M. , & J. Jarvis
    (1991) The communicative function of minimal responses in everyday conversation. Journal of Social Psychology131.4: 519-23. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1991.9713882
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9713882 [Google Scholar]
  8. Birdwhistell, R.L
    (1962) Critical moments in the psychiatric interview. In T.T. Tourlentes (ed.), Research approaches to a psychiatric problem. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 179-188.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, P. , & S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brunner, L.J
    (1979) Smiles can be back channels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 728-734. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.37.5.728
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.728 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clancy, P.M
    (1982) Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives. In D. Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 55-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clancy, P.M. , S.A. Thompson , R. Suzuki , & H. Tao
    (1996) The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics26: 355-87. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00036‑4
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. DeFrancisco, V.L
    (1991) The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse & Society2.4: 413-24. doi: 10.1177/0957926591002004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002004003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Deng, X
    (1999) Chinese and Australian conversational styles: A comparative sociolinguistic study of overlap and listener response. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Perth, Australia: Edith Cowan University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dittmann, A.T. , & L.G. Llewellyn
    (1967) The phonemic clause as a unit of speech decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6: 341-8. doi: 10.1037/h0024739
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024739 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1968) Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology9: 79-84. doi: 10.1037/h0025722
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025722 [Google Scholar]
  17. Drummond, K. , & R. Hopper
    (1993a) Backchannels revisited: Acknowledgement tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 157-177. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1993b) Some uses of yeah . Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 203-212. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_6
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_6 [Google Scholar]
  19. (1993c) Acknowledgment tokens in series. Communication Reports6.1: 47-53. doi: 10.1080/08934219309367561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219309367561 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duncan, S
    (1972) Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and social Psychology23: 283-292. doi: 10.1037/h0033031
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033031 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1973) Toward a grammar for dyadic conversation. Semiotica9: 29-46. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.29
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  22. Duncan, S. , & D. Fiske
    (1977) Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1985) Interaction structure and strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Duncan, S. , and Niederehe
    (1974) On signalling that it’s your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10: 234-47. doi: 10.1016/0022‑1031(74)90070‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90070-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Edelsky, C
    (1981) Who’s got the floor?Language in Society10: 383-421. doi: 10.1017/S004740450000885X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000885X [Google Scholar]
  26. Fishman, P
    (1978) Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems24: 397-406. doi: 10.2307/800492
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800492 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ford, C.E. , & S.A. Thompson
    (1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs , E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134-184. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fries, C.G
    (1952) The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gardner, R
    (2001) When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodwin, C
    (1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies9: 205-217. doi: 10.1007/BF00148127
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gumperz, J.J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  32. Günthner, S
    (1993) German-Chinese interactions: Differences in contextualization conventions and resulting miscommunication. Pragmatics: Quarterly Journal of the International Pragmatics Association 3.3: 283-304.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayashi, R
    (1988) Simultaneous talk: From the perspective of floor management of English and Japanese speakers. World Englishes 7.3: 269-288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1988.tb00237.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00237.x [Google Scholar]
  34. (1990) Rhythmicity, sequence and syncrony of English and Japanese face-to-face conversation. Language Sciences12.2/3: 155-195. doi: 10.1016/0388‑0001(90)90010‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(90)90010-E [Google Scholar]
  35. (1991) Floor structure of English and Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics16.1: 1-30. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90003‑G
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90003-G [Google Scholar]
  36. Hayashi, T. , & R. Hayashi
    (1991) Back channel or main channel: A cognitive approach based on floor and speech acts. Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series2: 119-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heritage, J
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hinds, J
    (1978) Conversational structure: An investigation based on Japanese interview discourse. In J. Hinds & I. Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp. 79-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jefferson, G
    (1983) Two explorations of the organization of overlapping talk in conversation: Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, No. 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1984) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘Mm hm’. Papers in Linguistics17: 197-216. doi: 10.1080/08351818409389201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
  41. (1993) Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 1-30. (Original work published 1983). doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kendon, A.
    (1967) Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26: 22-63. (Reprinted in A. Kendon (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-89). doi: 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Krauss, R.M. , & S. Weinheimer
    (1966) Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology4: 342-346.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kraut, R.E. , S.H. Lewis & L.W. Swezey
    (1982) Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43.4: 718-731. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.43.4.718
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.718 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lakoff, R
    (1973) Language and woman’s place. Language in Society2: 45-80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  46. Leavitt, H.J. , & R.A.H. Mueller
    (1951) Some effects of feedback on communication. Human Relations4: 401-410. doi: 10.1177/001872675100400406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400406 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lebra, T.S
    (1976) Japanese Patterns of Behavior. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Leet-Pellegrini, H.M
    (1980) Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In H. Giles , W.P. Robinson & P.M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 97-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lehtonen, J. , & K. Sajavaara
    (1985) The silent Finn. In D. Tannen & M. Saville-Troike (eds.), Perspective on silence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 193-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lerner, G.H
    (1989) Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication53: 167-177. doi: 10.1080/10570318909374298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374298 [Google Scholar]
  51. (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society20.3: 441-458. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  52. (1996) On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs , E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238-276. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  53. LoCastro, V
    (1987)  Aizuchi: A Japanese conversational routine. In L.E. Smith (ed.), Discourse across cultures. New York: Prentice Hall, pp. 101-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Marche, T.A. , & C. Peterson
    (1993) On the gender differential use of listener responsiveness. Sex Roles29.11/12: 795-816. doi: 10.1007/BF00289219
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289219 [Google Scholar]
  55. Maynard, S.K
    (1986) On back-channel behavior in Japanese and English casual conversation. Linguistics24. 6(286): 1079-1108. doi: 10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1079 [Google Scholar]
  56. (1987) Interactional functions of a nonverbal sign: Head movement in Japanese dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics11: 589-606. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90181‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90181-0 [Google Scholar]
  57. (1989) Japanese Conversation: Self-Contextualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (1990) Conversation management in contrast: Listener response in Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics14: 397-412. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90097‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90097-W [Google Scholar]
  59. (1997) Analyzing interactional management in native/non-native English conversation: A case of listener response. IRAL, XXXV1: 37-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Miller, L.C. , R.E. Lechner & D. Rugs
    (1985) Development of conversational responsiveness: Preschoolers’ use of responsive listener cues and relevant comments. Developmental Psychology21: 473-480. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.21.3.473
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.473 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mizutani, N
    (1982) The listener’s response in Japanese conversation. Sociolinguistics Newsletter13.1: 33-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Pillet-Shore, D
    (2003) Doing “Okay”: On the multiple metrics of an assessment. Research on Language and Social Interaction36.3: 285–319. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_03 [Google Scholar]
  63. Psathas, G. , & T. Anderson
    (1990) The ‘practice’ of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica78.1/2: 75-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rosenfeld, H.M
    (1966) Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6: 597-605. doi: 10.1037/h0023996
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023996 [Google Scholar]
  65. (1967) Nonverbal reciprocation of approval: An experimental analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology3: 102-111. doi: 10.1016/0022‑1031(67)90040‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90040-6 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , & G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schegloff, E.A
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70.6: 1075-95. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  68. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1981.Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schenkein, J.N
    (ed.) (1978) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Stubbe, M
    (1998) Are you listening? Cultural influences on the use of supportive verbal feedback in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics29: 257-289. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00042‑8
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00042-8 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tao, H. , & S.A. Thompson
    (1991) English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic ‘interference.’ Journal of Pragmatics 16.3: 209-233. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90093‑D
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90093-D [Google Scholar]
  72. Tannen, D
    (1981a) New York Jewish conversational style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language30: 133-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. (1981b) The machine-gun question: An example of conversational style. Journal of Pragmatics5: 383-397. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90025‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90025-4 [Google Scholar]
  74. (1984) Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. (1990) You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Thwaite, A
    (1993) Gender differences in spoken interaction in same sex dyadic conversations in Australian English. ARAL10: 147-179.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Tottie, G
    (1991) Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik.London & New York: Longman, pp. 254-335.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Ward, N. , & W. Tsukahara
    (2000) Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1177-1207. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00109‑5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00109-5 [Google Scholar]
  79. West, C. , & D. Zimmerman
    (1983) Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne , C. Kramerae & N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 103-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. White, R
    (1997) Back channelling, repair, pausing, and private speech. Applied Linguistics18.3: 314-343. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.3.314
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.3.314 [Google Scholar]
  81. White, S
    (1989) Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society18: 59-76. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500013270
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013270 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wieland, M
    (1991) Turn-taking structure as a source of misunderstanding in French-American cross-cultural conversation. Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series2: 101-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Yamada, H
    (1989) American and Japanese topic management strategies in business meetings. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Georgetown University.
  84. Yngve, V.H
    (1970) On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 567-577.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Zimmerman, D.H
    (1993) Acknowledgement tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 179-194. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_4 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Australian English; Conversational styles; Listener responses; Mandarin Chinese
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error