1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Drawing on a corpus of French radio phone-in confidential chats, this paper deals with the resources that participants recurrently employ to get back to a prior course of action following age-inquiry sequences. It might be expected that the age sequence occurs predominantly during the initial, opening part of the phone-call, as part of the caller’s identification sequence. Although such occurrences can be found, the age sequence is produced overwhelmingly after the introduction of the reason for call or after a pre- announcement of it. The way in which participants link back to the activity preceding the age sequence is related to the sequential placement of the age sequence as well as to the ‘authorship’ of its initiation and termination. Backlinking turns may therefore be analyzed with respect to their pragmatic effects (as doing restart, continuation, disjunction etc.) and with regard to the syntax and the linguistic units that speakers employ to achieve these effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18.3.02ste
2008-01-01
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashby, William J
    (1988) The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left and right dislocations in French. Lingua75.2-3: 203-229. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(88)90032‑0
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90032-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. Button, Graham , & Neil Casey
    (1984) Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167-190.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    (2004) Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. Ford (eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies of phonetics and prosody for conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 335-376. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferrara, Kathleen W
    (1997) Form and function of the discourse marker 'anyway': Implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics35: 343-378. doi: 10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.343
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.343 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fitzgerald, Richard , & William Housley
    (2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorical flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5579-602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford, Cecilia E. , Barbara A. Fox , & Sandra A. Thompson
    (2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C.E. Ford , B.A. Fox , & S.A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Geluykens, Ronald
    (1994) Right dislocation and self-repair. InThe pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: Evidence from conversational repair. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 89-124. doi: 10.1515/9783110846171
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110846171 [Google Scholar]
  8. Heritage, John
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Heritage, John , & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    (1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design . Language in society23: 1-29. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017656
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656 [Google Scholar]
  10. Holt, Elizabeth , & Paul Drew
    (2005) Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on language and social interaction38.1: 35-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie , & Gabrielle Müller
    (2005) L'implication de la dislocation à droite dans l'organisation interactionnelle. In S. Pekarek Doehler & M.-J. Béguelin (eds.), Grammaire, discours, interaction. La structuration de l'information (=Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 41: 127-145.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutchby, Ian
    (2006) Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Glasgow: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson, Gail
    (1972) Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 294-338.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1984) On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.M. Maxwell & J. Heritage (ed.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Korolija, Natascha , & Per Linell
    (1996) Episodes: Coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation. Linguistics34.4: 799-831. doi: 10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.799
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.799 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambrecht, Knud
    (2001) Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath , E. König , W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1050-1078.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2004) On the interaction of information structure and formal structure in constructions. The case of French right-detached comme-N. In M. Friedman & J.-O. Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.157-199. doi: 10.1075/cal.2.05lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.05lam [Google Scholar]
  18. Local, John
    (1992) Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 272-296. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.18loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.18loc [Google Scholar]
  19. (2004) Getting back to prior talk. and-uh(m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C.E. Ford (eds.), Sound patterns in interaction. Cross- linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Company, pp. 377-401. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62.18loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.18loc [Google Scholar]
  20. Mazeland, Harrie , & Mike Huiskes
    (2001) Dutch 'but' as a sequential conjunction. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 141-169. doi: 10.1075/sidag.10.08maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.08maz [Google Scholar]
  21. Ochs, E. , E.A. Schegloff , & Sandra A. Thompson
    (eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.53-55. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pomerantz, Anita M
    (1975) Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Dissertation: University of California Irvine.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, Harvey
    (1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1992) Lectures on conversation. G. Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , & Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?" Sociological inquiry 50.3-4: 104-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  27. (1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in- interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 52-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs , E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-133. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schegloff, Emmanuel A
    (2001) Conversation Analysis: A project in process – increments. Forum lecture delivered at the LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , & Harvey Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8: 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  31. Walker, Gareth
    (2004) On some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turns in talk-in interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C.E. Ford (eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 147-169. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62.10wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.10wal [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18.3.02ste
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Backlinking , Conversation Analysis , French , Radio phone-in programs , Sequentiality and Topic management
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error