1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper investigates the way speakers construct their identities as representatives of their companies (institutional identity construction) in relation to the way they “project” an identity onto their audiences. The audience is “altercasted” (Weinstein and Deutschberger 1963) in the role of potential buyer of a product, thus evoking the standardized relational pair (Sacks 1972) of seller/buyer. The speaker then presents his company in the complementary role of seller of a product and as such a link is established between the identities of the speaker’s company and the audience. This discursive co-construction of identities is crucial for the way both identities receive meaning. The two cases that are discussed here on the one hand show similarities in the general pattern of the two identity constructions and the way they are interwoven with one another, but on the other hand also demonstrate that there are many unique and diverging ways of constructing and linking these identities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18.3.07mie
2008-01-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J. , and A. Georgakopoulou
    (2003) Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.110
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.110 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, C
    (1994) Explaining and Arguing, The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolinger, D
    (1979) Metaphorical agression: Bluenoses and coffin nails. In J.E. Alatis & G.R. Tucker (eds.), Language in Public Life (GURT). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 258-271.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, M
    (2006) Constructing a new political spectacle: Tactics of Chen Shui-bian’s 2000 and 2004 Inaugural Speeches. Discourse & Society 17.5: 583–608. doi: 10.1177/0957926506066297
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066297 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Fina, A
    (2003) Identity in Narrative, a Study of Immigrant Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sin.3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sin.3 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Fina, A. , D. Schiffrin , and M. Bamberg
    (2006) Introduction. In A. De Fina , D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (eds.), Discourse and Identity, Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Du Gay, P. , J. Evans , and P. Redman
    (2000) General introduction. In P. Du Gay , J. Evans & P. Redman (eds.), Identity: A reader. London: Sage, pp. 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards, D. , and J. Potter
    (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferencik, M
    (2007) Exercising politeness: Membership categorization in a radio phone-in programme. Pragmatics17.3: 351-370.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fowler, R. , and G. Kress
    (1979) Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler , B. Hodge , G. Kress & T. Trew (eds.), Language and control. London: Routledge, pp. 185-213.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E
    (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1979) Footing. Semiotica25.1/2: 1-29. doi: 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall, S
    (2000) Who needs 'identity'?In P. Du Gay , J. Evans & P. Redman (eds.), Identity: A reader. London: Sage, pp. 15-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris, Robert A
    (2005) A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices. Available at [accessed onOctober 9, 2006]: www.virtualsalt.com/rhetoric.htm
  15. Hewitt, J.P. , and R. Stokes
    (1975) Disclaimers. American Sociological Review40.1: 1-11. doi: 10.2307/2094442
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094442 [Google Scholar]
  16. Holmes, J
    (1984) Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics8: 345-65. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90028‑6
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jayyusi, L
    (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnstone, B
    (1996) The linguistic individual. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, G
    (1973) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic2: 458-508. doi: 10.1007/BF00262952
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1991) Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf. Available at [accessedonOctober 9, 2006]: www3.iath.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Texts/Scholarly/Lakoff_Gulf_Metaphor_1.html
  21. Malone, M.J
    (1995) How to do things with friends: Altercasting and recipient design. Research on Language and Social Interaction28.2: 147-170. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2802_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2802_3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Matoesian, G.M
    (1999) The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society28: 491-521. doi: 10.1017/S0047404599004017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599004017 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ochs, E
    (1979) Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction26.3: 287-306. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pomerantz, A
    (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9: 219- 29. doi: 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  26. Potter, J
    (1996) Representing Reality; discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446222119
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119 [Google Scholar]
  27. Prince, E.F. , J. Frader , and C. Bosk
    (1982) On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In R.J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the Professions. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 83-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sacks, H
    (1972) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 31-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Volume 1. Oxford UK / Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, E.A
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1992) On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work - Interaction in institutional settings (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101-134.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schiffrin, D
    (1985) Everyday Argument: The organization of diversity in talk. in T. Van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis:Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, pp. 35- 46.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tannen, D
    (1989) Talking Voices, Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van De Mieroop, D.
    (2005) An integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the study of identity in speeches. Discourse & Society16.1: 107-130. doi: 10.1177/0957926505048232
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505048232 [Google Scholar]
  35. Van De Mieroop, D
    (2006) The implications of identity and fact construction for the genre of informative speeches. In P. Gillaerts & P. Shaw (eds.), The map and the Landscape, Norms and Practices in Genre. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 147-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. . (2007) The complementarity of two identities and two approaches; Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1120-1142.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Van De Mieroop, D. , J. de Jong , and B. Andeweg
    (2008) - I want to talk about… A rhetorical analysis of the introductions of 40 speeches about engineering. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22.2: 186-210. doi: 10.1177/1050651907311926
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907311926 [Google Scholar]
  38. Weinstein, E.A
    (1969) The development of interpersonal competence. In D.A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally and Company, pp. 753-775.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Weinstein, E.A. , and P. Deutschberger
    (1963) Some dimensions of altercasting. Sociometry: Journal of interpersonal relations26: 454-466.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18.3.07mie
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Altercasting , Identity construction , Recipient design , Speeches and Standardized relational pairs
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error