1887
Volume 29, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing on theoretical approaches to personal/group behaviour, and informed by Michael Hoey’s priming theory, this paper presents a corpus-assisted discourse study of European Parliament interventions from 2004 to 2011. The study aims to identify the group in the self and the various selves in the individual. For the analysis, three corpora from the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus Archive are explored: EP_EN (with EP interventions: 26,959,446 tokens), HC (with House of Commons interventions: 70,567,728), and SandD_david_martin (with member of European Parliament – MEP – David Martin’s interventions: 116,781). The main tool of analysis is the keyword, as generated by WordSmith 7.0. The analysis proceeds in three stages: stage 1, where the EP_EN and HC wordlists are compared, resulting in EP key priming; stage 2, where the SandD_david_martin and HC wordlists are compared, exposing David Martin’s idiosyncratic productions; and stage 3, where the EP_EN and SandD_david_martin keyword lists are manually compared, leading to the identification of EP priming in David Martin’s interventions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18026.cal
2019-02-22
2019-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashforth, Blake, and Fred Mael
    1989 “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” Academy of Management Review14 (1): 20–39. 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul, and Jesse Egbert
    (eds) 2016Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus-Linguistic Research. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724812
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724812 [Google Scholar]
  3. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2016The European Parliament: The Citizens’ Voice in the EU. A Short Guide to the European Parliament. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. European Union
    European Union, n.d.The EU in Brief. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/eu-in-brief_en (accessedSeptember 23, 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabrielatos, Costas
    2018 “Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques.” InCorpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review, ed. byCharlotte Taylor, and Anna Marchi, 224–257. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179346‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179346-11 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabrielatos, Costas, and Paul Baker
    2008 “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press 1996–2005.” Journal of English Linguistics36 (1): 5–38. 10.1177/0075424207311247
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gabrielatos, Costas, and Anna Marchi
    2012 “Keyness: Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues.” In: CADS International Conference 2012. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies: More Than the Sum of Discourse Analysis and Computing? University of Bologna (Italy), 13–14September 2012 Bologna and Siena: Corpus Linguistics SiBol.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halliday, Michael
    1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoey, Michael
    2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2013 “Lexical Priming and Translation.” InCorpus-Based Translation Studies: Research and Applications, ed. byAlet Kruger, Kim Wallmach, and Jeremy Munday, 153–168. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hogg, Michael, and Domininc Abrams
    1988Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lévi-Strauss, Claude
    1966The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2009 “Corpora and Critical Discourse Analysis.” InContemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. byPaul Baker, 32–46. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin, James, and Peter White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  15. McEnery, Tony
    2016 “Keywords.” InTriangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, ed. byPaul Baker, and Jesse Egbert, 19–32. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
    2012Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Munday, Jeremy
    2012Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-Making. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203117743
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117743 [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Keeffe, Anne, and Michael McCarthy
    2010The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949 [Google Scholar]
  19. Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
    2013Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott, Mike
    1999WordSmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00011‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2009 “In Search of a Bad Reference Corpus.” InWhat’s in a Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, ed. byDawn Archer, 79–92. Oxford: Ashgate Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2017WordSmith Tools Help. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Spears, Russell
    2011 “Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective.” InHandbook of Identity Theory and Research, ed. bySeth J. Schwartz, Koen Luyckx, Vivian L. Vignoles, 201–224, New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑7988‑9_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner
    1979 “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” InThe Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, ed. byWilliam G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1986 “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour.” InThe Social Psychology of Intergroup Behavior, ed. byStephen Worchel, and William G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Trepte, Sabine
    2006 “Social Identity Theory.” InPsychology of Entertainment, ed. byBryant Jennings, and Peter Vorderer, 255–272. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Dijk, Teun
    2014 “Discourse, Cognition, Society.” InThe Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis, ed. byJohannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingueneau, and Ruth Wodak, 388–400. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18026.cal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18026.cal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error