1887
image of Confronting blackface
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Recently, the Netherlands witnessed an agitated discussion over Black Pete, a blackface character associated with the Saint Nicholas festival. This paper analyzes a televised panel interview discussing a possible court ban of public Nicholas festivities, and demonstrates that participants not only disagree over the racist nature of the blackface character but also over the terms of the debate itself. Drawing on recent sociolinguistic work on stancetaking, it traces how panelists ‘laminate’ the interview’s participation framework by embedding their assessments of Black Pete in contrasting dialogical fields. Their stancetaking evokes opposing trajectories of earlier interactions and conjures up discursive complexes of identity/belonging that entail discrepant judgments over the acceptability of criticism. The extent to which a stance makes explicit the projected field’s phenomenal content, it is argued, reflects the relative (in)visibility of hegemonic we-ness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18039.dho
2019-11-22
2020-09-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angermuller, Johannes
    2011 “From the Many Voices to the Subject Positions in Anti-Globalization Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 2992–3000. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakely, Allison
    2001Blacks in the Dutch World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verscheuren
    1998Debating Diversity. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boer, Eugenie
    2014 “Sint-Nicolaas, een levende legende.” InSinterklaas verklaard, ed. byWillem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 11–32. Amsterdam: SWP.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brienen, Rebecca
    2014 “Types and Stereotypes: Zwarte Piet and His Early Modern Sources.” InDutch Racism, ed. byPhilomena Essed and Isabel Hoving, 179–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401210096_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210096_010 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brighenti, Andrea
    2007 “Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology55 (3): 323–342. 10.1177/0011392107076079
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107076079 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clift, Rebecca
    1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society28 (4): 523–553. 10.1017/S0047404599004029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599004029 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coupland, Justine, and Nikolas Coupland
    2009 “Attributing Stance in Discourses of Body Shape and Weight Loss.” InStance, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 227–249. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Damari, Rebecca
    2010 “Intertextual Stancetaking and the Local Negotiation of Cultural Identities by a Binational Couple.” Journal of Sociolinguistics14 (5): 609–629. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00456.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00456.x [Google Scholar]
  11. De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society10 (2): 149–173. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois, John
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse, ed. byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards, Derek
    2003 “Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of Mind-World Relationships.” InAnalyzing Race Talk, ed. byHarry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Englebretson, Robert
    (ed.) 2007Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  15. Essed, Philomena
    1997 “Racial Intimidation: Socio-political Implications of the Usage of racist Slurs.” InThe Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. byStephen Riggins (ed.), 131–152. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Essed, Philomena, and Isabel Hoving
    (eds.) 2014Dutch Racism. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401210096
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210096 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, Erving
    1981 “Footing.” In: Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Helsloot, John
    2005 “De strijd om Zwarte Piet.” InVeranderingen van het alledaagse 1950–2000, ed. byIsabel Hoving, Hester Dibbits and Marlou Schrover, 398–402. Den Haag: Sdu.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2008 “De ambivalente boodschap van de eerste ‘Zwarte Piet’ (1850).” InDe kleine Olympus, ed. byEveline Doelman and John Helsloot, 94–117. Amsterdam: Knaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 “Zwarte Piet and Cultural Aphasia in the Netherlands.” Quotidian3 (1): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 “Is Zwarte Piet uit te leggen?” InSinterklaas verklaard, ed. byWillem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 77–85. Amsterdam: SWP.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, John
    2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (1): 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hilhorst, Sacha, and Joke Hermes
    2015 “‘We Have Given Up So Much’: Passion and Denial in the Dutch Zwarte Piet (Black Pete) Controversy.” European Journal of Cultural Studies19 (3):218–233. 10.1177/1367549415603381
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415603381 [Google Scholar]
  24. Irvine, Judith
    1996 “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” InNatural Histories of Discourse, ed. byMichael Silverstein and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2009 “How Mr. Taylor Lost His Footing: Stance in a Colonial Encounter.” InStance, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 53–71. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaffe, Alexandra
    (ed) 2009Stance. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
    2009 “Taking an Elitist Stance.” InStance, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 195–226. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jefferson, Gail
    1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” InInteraction Competence, ed. byGeorge Psathas, 63–92. Washington: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiesling, Scott
    2011 “Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment, and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking.” Presented atiMean Conference, 15 April 2011. UWE, Bristol.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Knoops, Willem, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer
    (eds.) 2014Sinterklaas verklaard. Amsterdam: SWP.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kockelman, Paul
    2004 “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology14 (2): 127–150. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012 “Review of Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology22 (2): E105–E108. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2012.01144.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2012.01144.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Lempert, Michael
    2009 “On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded Stance-taking in U.S. Electoral Politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics13: 223–248. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00405.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00405.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
    1998 “On the Emergence of Political Identity in Czech Mass Media: The Case of the Democratic Party of Sudetenland.” Czech Sociological Review6: 43–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pijl, Yvon van der, and Karina Goulordava
    2014 “Black Pete, “Smug Ignorance,” and the Value of the Black Body in Postcolonial Netherlands.” New West Indian Guide88 (3/4): 262–291. 10.1163/22134360‑08803062
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22134360-08803062 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJohn Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rauniomaa, Mirka
    2003 “Stance Accretion.” Unpublished manuscript, UCSB.
  38. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2005Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203993712
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712 [Google Scholar]
  39. Reyes, Angela
    2011 “‘Racist!’ Metapragmatic Regimentation of Racist Discourse by Asian American Youth.” Discourse and Society22 (4): 458–473. 10.1177/0957926510395836
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395836 [Google Scholar]
  40. Silverstein, Michael
    1993 “Meta pragmatic discourse and meta pragmatic function.” InReflexive Language, ed. byJohn Lucy, 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication23 (3/4): 193–230. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stockburger, Inge
    2015 “Stancetaking and the Joint Construction of Zine Producer Identities in a Research Interview.” Journal of Sociolinguistics19 (2): 22–240. 10.1111/josl.12118
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12118 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vandergriff, Ilona
    2012 “Taking a Stance on Stance: Metastancing as Legitimation.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines6 (1): 53–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Zienkowski, Jan
    2017 “Re-articulating Critical Awareness about Racism in Public Discourse.” InEvaluation in Media Discourse, ed. byRuth Breeze and Inés Olza, 227–265. Frankfurt: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18039.dho
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error