1887
image of Affectivity in the #jesuisCharlie Twitter discussion
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN 2406-4238
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Twitter discussion with the hashtag #jesuisCharlie was a large-scale social media event commenting on the tragic terrorist attack that took place in Paris in 2015. In this paper, we analyze French tweets compiled with language technology methods from a large dataset. Our qualitative approach determines what types of affectivity are expressed. According to our results, first, core emotions are shared, and they are based on the identification with the internet meme (I am Charlie). In them, participants show their commitment to democratic values and freedom of speech, as well as grief. They build up a we-agency and togetherness between the networked participants. Second, participants disalign from those who do not share the same values or who are a threat to them. Here, the emotions range from irritation and doubt to anger and disgrace, manifesting awayness. They contain protest against how democratic values are violated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18066.joh
2020-03-06
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara
    2015The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge, New York & London.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednarek, Monika
    2008Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke England, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230285712
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan
    1989 “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect.” Text9 (1), 93–121. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouko, Catherine, Laura Calabrese, and Orphée De Clercq
    2017 “Cartoons as Interdiscourse: A Quali-quantitative Analysis of Social Representations Based on Collective Imagination in Cartoons Produced After the Charlie Hebdo Attack.” Discourse, Context & Media15: 24–33. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruns, Axel, and Yuxian Eugene Liang
    2012 “Tools and Methods for Capturing Twitter Data During Natural Disasters.” First Monday17 (4). firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3937/3193. AccessedMay 15, 2016. 10.5210/fm.v17i4.3937
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i4.3937 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dayter, Daria
    2016Discursive Self in Microblogging: Speech Acts, Stories and Self-praise. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.260
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.260 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Cock, Barbara, and Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
    2018 “From Expressing Solidarity to Mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic Functions of Hashtags Starting With #jesuis Across Languages.” Language in Society47 (2), 197–217. 10.1017/S0047404518000052
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000052 [Google Scholar]
  8. Divjak, Dagmar, and Nick Fieller
    2014 “Clustering Linguistic Data.” InCorpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, ed. byDylan Glynn, and Justyna Robinson, 405–441. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hcp.43.16div
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.16div [Google Scholar]
  9. Du Bois, John
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation and Interaction, ed. byRobert Englbretson, 139–182. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards, Derek
    1999 “Emotion Discourse.” Culture & Psychology5 (3): 271–291. 10.1177/1354067X9953001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter
    2017 “Some Uses of Subject-side Assessments.” Discourse Studies19 (5): 497–514. 10.1177/1461445617715171
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617715171 [Google Scholar]
  12. Enfield, Nick J., and Anna Wierzbicka
    2002 “The Body in Description of Emotion.” Pragmatics and Cognition10:½: 1–25. 10.1075/pc.10.1‑2.02enf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.10.1-2.02enf [Google Scholar]
  13. Firth, John Rupert
    1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–1955. InSelected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1959, ed by. Frank Robert Palmer, 168–205. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giaxoglou, Korina
    2018 “JeSuisCharlie? Hashtags as Narrative Resources in Contexts of Ecstatic Sharing.” Discourse, Context & Media22: 13–20. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Giglietto, Fabio, and Yenn Lee
    2015 “To Be or Not to Be Charlie: Twitter Hashtags as a Discourse and Counter-discourse in the Aftermath of the 2015 Charlie Hebdo Shooting in France.” InProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts, ed. byMatthew Rowe, Milan Stankovic, and Aba-Sah Dadzie, 33–37. Florence: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org). ceur-ws.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ginter, Filip, Jan, Hajič, Juhani, Luotolahti, Milan Straka, and Daniel, Zeman
    2017CoNLL 2017 Shared Task – Automatically Annotated Raw Texts and Word Embeddings. Prague: Charles University, LINDAT/CLARIN Digital Library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL), Faculty of Mathematics and Physics. hdl.handle.net/11234/1-1989
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gries, Stefan Th
    2012 “Behavioral Profiles: A Fine-grained and Quantitative Approach in Corpus-based Lexical Semantics.” InMethodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research, ed. byGary Libben, Gonia Jarema, and Chris Westbury, 57–80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.47.04gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.47.04gri [Google Scholar]
  18. Hepp, Andreas, and Nick Couldry
    2010 “Introduction: Media Events in Globalized Media Cultures.” InMedia Events in a Global Age, ed. byAndreas Hepp, Nick Couldry, and Friedrich Krotz, 1–20. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johansson, Marjut
    2017 Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums: Public Vernacular Discourse. Discourse, Context and Media (19), 5–12. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Johansson, Marjut, Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen, Filip Ginter, Lotta Lehti, Attila Krizsán, and Veronika Laippala
    2018 ”Opening Up #jesuisCharlie Anatomy of a Twitter Discussion With Mixed Methods.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 90–101. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaufman, Leonard, and Peter J. Rousseeuw
    1990Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley. 10.1002/9780470316801
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801 [Google Scholar]
  22. Linell, Per
    2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
    2013 “Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication.” International Journal of Cultural Studies16 (2): 169–187. 10.1177/1367877912452486
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mikolov, Tomas, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean
    2013 “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” InICLR Workshop.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Moisl, Hermann
    2015Cluster Analysis for Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110363814
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110363814 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nugier, Armelle, and Serge Guimond
    2016 « Je suis Charlie » New Findings on the Social and Political Psychology of Terrorism. International Review of Social Psychology29 (1): 45–49. 10.5334/irsp.60
    https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.60 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ochs, Elinor
    1996 “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi Schiefflin
    1989 ”Language Has a Heart.” Text9 (1): 7–25. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Page, Ruth
    2012 “The Linguistics of Self-branding and Micro-celebrity in Twitter: The Role of Hashtags.” Discourse & Communication6 (2): 181–201. 10.1177/1750481312437441
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics62: 30–45. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2015Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Smyrnaios, Nikos, and Pierre Ratinaud
    2017 “The Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of a Political Controversy in English and French.” Social Media + Society3 (1): 1–13. 10.1177/2056305117693647
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117693647 [Google Scholar]
  33. Salmela, Mikko, and Nagatsu, Michiru
    2017 “How Does It Really Feel to Act Together? Shared Emotions and The Phenomenology of We-Agency”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences16, 449–470. 10.1007/s11097‑016‑9465‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-016-9465-z [Google Scholar]
  34. Straka, Milan, and Jana Straková
    2017 “Tokenizing, POS Tagging, Lemmatizing and Parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe.” InProceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies, 88–99. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/K17‑3009
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-3009 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zappavigna, Michele
    2017 “Twitter.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 201–224. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-008 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2014 “Enacting Identity in Microblogging Through Ambient Affiliation.” Discourse & Communication2: 209–228. 10.1177/1750481313510816
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510816 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011 “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society13 (5): 788–806. 10.1177/1461444810385097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.18066.joh
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: #jesuisCharlie; large-scale data; positioning; affectivity; Twitter; emotions; togetherness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error