1887
Language, discourse and identities
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the lexical pairs άνδρας/άντρας ‘man’ vs. γυναίκα ‘woman’ and αγόρι ‘boy’ vs. κορίτσι ‘girl’ in the construction of gender identity. We use corpus methodology to study the frequency, meanings and collocations of the noun pairs in five different genres of Greek, namely news and opinion articles from newspapers, and general interest, male and female magazines (2,4 million words in total). Our findings point to a fundamental asymmetry in the treatment of the two genders. Furthermore, genre and audience design are found to be prominent in gender construction: In general, male identity is viewed in similar ways in all genres, whereas female identity is constructed in a less uniform way, since texts addressed to women significantly diverge from other genres. Thus, lexical choices are affected by the positioning of the text producer as a member of an in-group, especially in genres in which gender is foregrounded.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19.3.02gou
2009-01-01
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anastasiadi-Symeonidi , and Chila-Markopoulou/ Αναστασιάδη-Συμεωνίδη, Α. & Δ. Χειλά-Μαρκοπούλου
    (επιμ) (2003) Το γένος. Αθήνα: Πατάκης.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archakis and Kondyli/ Αρχάκης, Α. & M. Κονδύλη
    (2002) Εισαγωγή στην Κοινωνιογλωσσολογία. Αθήνα: Νήσος.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Babiniotis/ Μπαμπινιώτης Γ
    (2002) Λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής Γλώσσας. Αθήνα: Κέντρο Λεξικολογίας. 2η έκδοση.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, P
    (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolinger, D
    (1980) Language, the Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron, D
    (2003) Gender issues in language change. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics23: 187-201. doi: 10.1017/S0267190503000266
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000266 [Google Scholar]
  7. Charalambakis/ Χαραλαμπάκης, Χ
    (2001) Νεοελληνικός λόγος. 3η έκδοση. Αθήνα.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. del-Teso-Craviotto, M
    (2006) Words that matter: Lexical choice and gender ideologies in women’s magazines. Journal of Pragmatics38: 2003-2021. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.012
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijk, T.A. van
    (1998) Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell , and P. Garrett (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 21-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fragaki, G. , and D. Goutsos
    (forthcoming) Gender adjectives and identity construction in Greek corpora. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 8-10 September 2005, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fragoudaki/ Φραγκουδάκη, Α.
    (1988) Γλώσσα λανθάνουσα-2. Δίνη 3: 82-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1989) Γλώσσα λανθάνουσα-3 ή γιατί δεν υπάρχουν βουλεύτριες παρά μόνο χορεύτριες. Δίνη 4: 42-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Georgakopoulou, A
    (1995) Women, men and conversational narrative performances: Aspects of gender in Greek storytelling. Anthropological Linguistics37: 460-486.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gesuato, S
    (2003) The company women and men keep: What collocations can reveal about culture. In D. Archer , P. Rayson , A. Wilson , and T. McEnery (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 conference. UCREL, Lancaster University, pp. 253-262.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goutsos/ Γούτσος, Δ
    (2003) Σώμα Ελληνικών Κειμένων: Σχεδιασμός και υλοποίηση. Πρακτικά του 6ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου Ελληνικής Γλωσσολογίας, Πανεπιστήμιο Κρήτης, 18-21 Σεπτεμβρίου 2003. CD-ROM publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goutsos, D. , and M. Katsoyannou
    (2006) Gender construction and the Word Thesaurus for Greek. In E.- M. Thüne , S. Leonardi , and C. Bazzanella (eds.), Gender, Language and New Literacy: A Multilingual Analysis. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 95-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmes, J
    (2000)  Ladies and gentlemen: Corpus analysis and linguistic sexism. In C. Mair , and M. Hundt (eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Papers from the 20th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20). Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 141-155.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2001) A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand English. In M. Hellinger , and H. Bussman (eds.), Gender across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol.1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 115-136. doi: 10.1075/impact.9.10hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.10hol [Google Scholar]
  19. Holmes, J. , and R. Sigley
    (2002) What’s a word like girl doing in a place like this? Occupational labels, sexist usages and corpus research. In P. Peters , P. Collins , and A. Smith (eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 21st International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Sydney 2000. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 247-263.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kakridi-Ferrari/ Κακριδή-Φερράρι, Μ
    (2005) Γλώσσα και κοινωνικό περιβάλλον: Ζητήματα κοινωνιογλωσσολογίας. Α’ Μέρος. Αθήνα: Παρουσία αρ. 64.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kendall, S. , and D. Tannen
    (2003) Discourse and gender. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen , and H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 548-568. doi: 10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00029.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00029.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, R
    (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper Colophon.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leech, G. , and R. Fallon
    (2004) [1992] Computer corpora - what do they tell us about culture?In G. Sampson , and D. McCarthy (eds.), Corpus Linguistics. Readings in a Widening Discipline. London: Continuum, pp. 160-171.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Makri-Tsilipakou, M
    (1989) The gender of anthropos: An exercise in false generics. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Description and/or Comparison of English and Greek, School of English, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki, pp. 61-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1991) Agreement/disagreement: Affiliative vs. disaffiliative display in cross-sex conversations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of English Language and Literature, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  26. Makri-Tsilipakou/ Μακρή-Τσιλιπάκου, Μ
    (1996) Τι άλλαξε λοιπόν; Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα. Πρακτικά της 16ης Ετήσιας Συνάντησης του Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας του Τμήματος Φιλολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Α.Π.Θ . Θεσσαλονίκη, pp. 435-446.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Makri-Tsilipakou, M
    (2003) Greek diminutive use problematized: Gender, culture and common sense. Discourse & Society 14.6: 699-726. doi: 10.1177/09579265030146002
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pavlidou/ Παυλίδου, Θ
    (1985) Παρατηρήσεις στα θηλυκά επαγγελματικά. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα , Πρακτικά της 5ης ετήσιας συνάντησης του Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Α. Π. Θ. εσσαλονίκη: Αφοί Κυριακίδη, pp. 201-217.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pavlidou: Παυλίδου, Θ.-Σ
    . (επιμ) (2002) Γλώσσα – Γένος – Φύλο. Θεσσαλονίκη: Παρατηρητής.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavlidou et al / Παυλίδου, Θ.-Σ. , Αλβανούδη, Α. & Καραφώτη, Ε
    (2004) Γραμματικό γένος και σημασιακό περιεχόμενο: Προκαταρκτικές παρατηρήσεις για τη λεξιλογική αναπαράσταση των φύλων. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα. Πρακτικά της 24ης Ετήσιας Συνάντησης του Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας του Τμήματος Φιλολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Α.Π.Θ. Θεσσαλονίκη, pp. 543-553.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ralli, A
    (2002) The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek. Linguistics40: 519-551. doi: 10.1515/ling.2002.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2002.022 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmid, H.-J
    (2003) Do women and men really live in different cultures? Evidence from the BNC. In A. Wilson , P. Rayson , and T. McEnery (eds.), Corpora by the Lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 185-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sigley, R. , and J. Holmes
    (2002) Looking at girls in corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics30.2: 138-157. doi: 10.1177/007242030002001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007242030002001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stubbs, M
    (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis. Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2001) Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tannen, D
    (1982) Ethnic style in male-female conversation. In J. Gumperz (ed.), Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217-231.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1983) “I take out the rock – dok!”: How Greek women tell about being molested (and create involvement). Anthropological Linguistics25: 359-374.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Triandaphyllidis/ Ίδρυμα Μανόλη Τριανταφυλλίδη
    (1998)Λεξικό της κοινής νεοελληνικής. Θεσσαλονίκη: Α.Π.Θ., Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Σπουδών.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsokalidou/ Τσοκαλίδου, Ρ
    (1996) Το φύλο της γλώσσας. Αθήνα: Σύνδεσμος Ελληνίδων Επιστημόνων.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19.3.02gou
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Audience design , Corpus linguistics , Gender , Genre , Identity , Noun and Vocabulary pairs
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error