Language, discourse and identities
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


In this paper I look at how through the use of teasing as a socially recurrent activity the members of a multilingual, multicultural and multiethnic peer group (comprised of majority Greek and minority Turkish-speaking children of Roma heritage) make particular identity ascriptions and displays salient and position themselves and others in particular ways in peer talk during break-time in an Athens primary school. Taking as a point of departure that identities are produced relationally, through systems of opposition (Barth 1969), the paper deals with how members of this school-based peer group exploit teasing as a versatile discursive device to construct one particular peer as a “poor” pupil and themselves by extension as “good” pupils in talk-in-interaction. The focus on the situated and relational construction of identity makes visible how children position themselves with regard to others in order to construct academic hierarchies. At the same time, it brings to the fore how through such positionings children may reproduce but also challenge powerful institutional discourses of academic success and failure in circulation in the classroom by negotiating identity options closer to their peer concerns. These processes of identity construction demonstrate how social selves are produced in interaction through contestation and collaboration and how identities may be simultaneously chosen and imposed through language use.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Androusou, A
    (1996) An intercultural dimension in educational practiceIn A. Vafea (ed.), The multicoloured school. An experience of intercultural education through art. Athens: Nisos, pp. 11-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, J.K. , and A. Georgakopoulou
    (eds.) (2003) Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.110
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.110 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antaki, C. , and S. Widdicombe
    (eds.) (1998) Identities in talk. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Antonopoulou, E. , and M. Sifianou
    (2003) Conversational dynamics of humour: The telephone game in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics35.5: 741-769. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00150‑9
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00150-9 [Google Scholar]
  5. Archakis, A. , and V. Tsakona
    (2005) Analyzing conversational data in GTVH terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construction via humor. Humor18.1: 41-68. doi: 10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.41
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.41 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ardington, A
    (2006) Playfully negotiated activity in girls’ talk. Journal of Pragmatics38: 73-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.005
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Asimakopoulou, F. , and S. Christidou-Lionaraki
    (2002) Η Μουσουλμανική μειονότητα της Θράκης και οι Ελληνοτουρκικές σχέσεις [The Muslim Minority of Thrace and Greek-Turkish relations]. Athens: Livanis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bateson, G
    (1972) Steps to an ecology of the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boxer, D. , and F. Cortés-Conde
    (1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics27: 275-294. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00031‑8
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barth, F
    (1969) Introduction. In F. Barth (ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference. Bergen-Oslo: Universitets Forlaget, pp. 9-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bucholtz, M. , and K. Hall
    (2004) Language and identity. In A. Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 369- 394.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Fina, A. , D. Schiffrin , and M. Bamberg
    (eds.) (2006) Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511584459
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459 [Google Scholar]
  13. Drew, P
    (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics25: 219-253. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eder, D
    (1991) The role of teasing in adolescent peer group culture. In S. Cahill (ed.), Sociological studies of child development: Perspectives on & of children. Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 181-197.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fine, G
    (1984) Humorous interaction and the social construction of meaning: Making sense in a jocular vein. In N. Denzin (ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction. Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 83-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1990) With the boys: Little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, E
    (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gumperz, J.J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  19. Holmes, J. , and M. Marra
    (2002) Humor as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others. Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 377-400. doi: 10.1075/pbns.98.23hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.23hol [Google Scholar]
  20. Kotthoff, H
    (2000) Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humourous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics32: 55-80. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00031‑4
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00031-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2006) Gender and humour: The state of the art. Pragmatics38: 4-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lytra, V
    (2007a) Play frames and social identities. Contact encounters in a Greek primary school. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.163
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.163 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2007b) Teasing in contact encounters: Frames, participant positions and responses. Multilingua26.4: 381-408. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2007.018
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2007.018 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2003) Nicknames and teasing: A case study of a linguistically and culturally mixed peer group. In J.K. Androutsopoulos & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 47-73. doi: 10.1075/pbns.110.04lyt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.110.04lyt [Google Scholar]
  25. Lo, A. , and A. Reyes
    (2004) Language, identity and relationality in Asian Pacific American: An introduction. Pragmatics14.2/3: 115-125.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McDermott, R.P. , and H. Tylbor
    (1995) On the necessity of collusion in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 218-236.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Norrick, N.R
    (1993) Conversational joking. Humour in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Straehle, C.A
    (1993) “Samuel?” “Yes, dear?” Teasing and conversational rapport. In D. Tannen (ed.), Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-230.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Talmy, S
    (2004) Forever FOB: The cultural production of ESL in a high school. Pragmatics14.2/3: 149-172.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vafea, A
    . (ed.) (1996) The multicoloured school. An experience of intercultural education through art. Athens: Nisos.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error