1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 30, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This introductory position paper aims to familiarise the reader with the pragmatics of ritual and previous research in this field. Ritual is a complex pragmatic phenomenon present in many types of interaction, and it has been subject to academic inquiries in various disciplines. We will draw on previous research to provide a working definition of ritual, which will help us to introduce the present collection of papers. We will then introduce the different, but interrelated, methodologies used in ritual research, categorising these complementary methodologies as ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ respectively. We use this categorisation to overview the contributions of the special issue from a methodological perspective. Finally, a summary of the contents of the special issue completes this introduction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19016.kad
2020-03-13
2023-09-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.19016.kad
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.19016.kad.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19016.kad&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C.
    2004 “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory22 (4): 527–573. 10.1111/j.0735‑2751.2004.00233.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00233.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnovick, Leslie
    1984 Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, John L.
    1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bax, Marcel
    1999 “Ritual Levelling: The Balance between the Eristic and Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal Encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama.” InHistorical Dialogue Analysis, ed. byAndreas Jucker, Gerd Fritz, and Franz Lebsanft, 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.03bax
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.03bax [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness, and Ritual Display in Early-Modern Dutch Letter Writing.” InHistorical (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 37–86. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bull, Peter, and Maurice Waddle
    2019 “‘Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question’: The Impact of Quoting Members of the Public in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (1): 56–78. 10.1075/jlac.00019.bul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00019.bul [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, Randall
    2004 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400851744
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulmas, Florian
    1981 “Conversational Routine.” InConversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. byFlorian Coulmas, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25 (3): 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Durkheim, Émile
    1912 [1954/2001] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans.Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Edmondson, Willis
    1981 Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards, Walter
    1989 Modern Japan Through Its Weddings: Gender, Person, and Society in Ritual Portrayal. California: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 1983 “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review48 (1): 1–17. 10.2307/2095141
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grimes, Ronald L.
    1990 Ritual Criticism: Case Studies in Its Practice, Essays on Its Theory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Haugh, Michael
    2004 “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Politeness in English and Japanese.” Multilingua23 (2): 85–109. 10.1515/mult.2004.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.009 [Google Scholar]
  19. Horgan, Mervyn
    2019 “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (1): 32–55. 10.1075/jlac.00018.hor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00018.hor [Google Scholar]
  20. House, Juliane
    1989 “Politeness in English and German: the Functions of Please and Bitte.” InCross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, N.J.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ide, Risako
    1998 “‘Sorry for your Kindness’: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics29 (5): 509–529. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)80006‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80006-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Marquez-Reiter
    2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research11 (2): 239–260.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Keane, Webb
    1997 “Religious Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology26: 47–71. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.47
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kopytko, Roman
    2007 “Philosophy and Pragmatics: A Language-game with Ludwig Wittgenstein.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (5): 792–812. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  27. Koutlaki, Sofia A.
    2002 “Offers and Expressions of Thanks as Face Enhancing Acts: Tæ’arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (12): 1733–1756. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00055‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00055-8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, William
    1972 “Rules for Ritual Insults.” InLanguage in The Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular, ed. byWilliam Labov, 297–353. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1981 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lüger, Heinz-Helmut
    1983 “Some Aspects of Ritual Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics7 (6): 695–711. 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90091‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90091-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. McIlvenny, Penny
    1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society25 (1): 27–60. 10.1017/S004740450002042X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002042X [Google Scholar]
  32. Muir, Edwards
    2005 Ritual in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ohashi, Jun
    2013 Thanking and Politeness in Japanese: Balancing Acts in Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137009876
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009876 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rampton, Ben
    1995 “Language Crossing and the Problematisation of Ethnicity and Socialization.” Pragmatics5 (4): 485–513. 10.1075/prag.5.4.04ram
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.5.4.04ram [Google Scholar]
  35. 2009 Interaction Ritual and Not Just Artful Performance in Crossing and Stylization.” Language in Society38 (2): 149–176. 10.1017/S0047404509090319
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509090319 [Google Scholar]
  36. Senft, Gunter, and Ellen Basso
    2009 Ritual Communication. Oxford: Berg Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shardakova, Maria
    2005 “Intercultural Pragmatics in the Speech of American L2 Learners of Russian: Apologies Offered by Americans in Russian.” Intercultural Pragmatics2 (4): 423–451. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.423
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.423 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2013 “Decoding Coded (Im)politeness: ‘Cause on My Teasing You Can Depend”’. Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. byMarta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1.13sin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.13sin [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, Philip, Timothy L. Phillips, and Ryan. D. King
    2010 Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781803
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781803 [Google Scholar]
  40. Staal, Fritz
    1979 “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen26 (1): 2–22. 10.1163/156852779X00244
     https://doi.org/10.1163/156852779X00244 [Google Scholar]
  41. Terkourafi, Marina
    2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
  42. Turner, Victor H.
    1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 1974 “Liminal to Liminoid in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology.” Rice University Studies60 (3): 53–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Gennep, Arnold
    1960 The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wuthnow, Robert
    1989 Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19016.kad
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): definition; methodological approaches; ritual

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error