1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 30, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which mediators deploy the rite of public shaming in the activity type of public mediation, as a pragmatic device by means of which they exert social control. Our data consists of episodes of public mediation events in rural China, aired in the Chinese Television. Our analytic framework is anchored to the model of interactional relational rituals: we interpret shaming as a morally loaded communal interactional practice, which the mediator can deploy due to their ratified role, but only within frame of the ritual activity type, and with the communal goal of resolving the conflict. Thus, while ritual forms of shaming may be interactionally intensive – e.g. the person who inflicts shame may inflict shame with little mitigation to put pressure on the shamed person – strict rights and obligations regulate the behaviour of the mediator who needs to act as a ‘moral educator’.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19019.ran
2020-02-04
2023-06-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.19019.ran
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.19019.ran.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19019.ran&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. An, Meili, and Minge Peng
    2013 “On Mediators’ Management of Disagreement with Disputants in Chinese Televised Dispute Mediation.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication23 (1): 14–165.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard, Jayne W.
    1999 Reintegrative Shaming in Corporate Sentencing. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1333&context=facpubs
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Boudana, Sandrine
    2014 “Shaming Rituals in the Age Of Global Media: How DSK’s Perp Walk Generated Estrangement.” European Journal of Communication29 (1): 50–67. 10.1177/0267323113509361
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113509361 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer, Paul S.
    1978 Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braithwaite, John
    1999 Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 2002 “Repentance Rituals and Restorative Justice.” The Journal of Political Philosophy8 (1): 115–131. 10.1111/1467‑9760.00095
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00095 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, Randall
    2004 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400851744
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25 (3): 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Curran, James
    2005 “Communications, Power and Social Order.” InCulture, Society and the Media, ed. byM. Gurevitch, J. Curran, and T. Bennett, 198–231. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, Bethan L.
    2018 “Evaluating Evaluations: What Different Types of Metapragmatic Behaviour Can Tell Us about Participants’ Understandings of the Moral Order.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture14 (1): 121–151. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0037
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0037 [Google Scholar]
  13. Deng, Yiheng
    2012 “Strategy to Alleviate Adversity in Chinese Mediation: A Discourse Analysis on Real Chinese Mediation Sessions.” Chinese Journal of Communication5 (4): 417–436. 10.1080/17544750.2012.723386
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2012.723386 [Google Scholar]
  14. Deng, Yiheng, Kaibin Xu, Xiaoqiu Fu, and Sang Ma
    2013 “Mediating Conflict on TV: A Discourse Analysis of the Gold Medal Mediation Episodes.” China Media Research9 (4): 5–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Etzioni, Amitai
    2001 The Monochrome Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Every, Danielle
    2013 “‘Shame on You’: The Language, Practice and Consequences of Shame and Shaming in Asylum Seeker Advocacy.” Discourse & Society24 (6): 667–686. 10.1177/0957926513486223
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486223 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fung, Heidi
    1999 “Becoming a Moral Child: The Socialization of Shame among Young Chinese Children.” Ethos27 (2): 180–209. 10.1525/eth.1999.27.2.180
     https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1999.27.2.180 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, Harold
    1964 “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities.” Social Problems11: 225–250. Republished inStudies in Ethnomethodology, 35–75. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1967.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Maria Vasilaki
    2018 “The Personal and/as the Political: Small Stories and Impoliteness in Online Discussions of the Greek Crisis.” Internet Pragmatics: Special Issue – (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions1 (2): 215–240. 10.1075/ip.00011.geo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00011.geo [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Graham, Sage L.
    2018 “Impoliteness and the Moral Order in Online Gaming.” Internet Pragmatics: Special Issue – (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions1 (2): 303–328. 10.1075/ip.00014.lam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00014.lam [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris, Alexes
    2009 “The Role of Power in Shaming Interactions: How Social Control Is Performed in a Juvenile Court.” Contemporary Justice Review12 (4): 379–399. 10.1080/10282580903342854
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580903342854 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 52–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hawes, Colin, and Shuyu Kong
    2013 “Primetime Dispute Resolution: Reality TV Mediation Shows in China’s ‘Harmonious Society’.” Law & Society Review47 (4): 739–770. 10.1111/lasr.12046
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12046 [Google Scholar]
  25. Heo, Mansup, and Jaeyung Park
    2017 “Shame and Vicarious Shame in the News: A Case Study of the Sewol Ferry Disaster.” Journalism2: 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ho, David Yau-Fai
    1986 “Chinese Patterns of Socialization: A Critical Review.” InThe Psychology of the Chinese People, ed. byH. B. Michael, 1–37. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1994 “Face Dynamics: From Conceptualization to Measurement.” InThe Challenge of Facework, ed. byS. Ting-Toomey, 269–286. New York: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ho, David Yau-Fai, Wai Fu, and S. M. Ng
    2004 “Guilt, Shame and Embarrassment: Revelations of Face and Self.” Culture and Psychology10 (1): 64–84. doi:  10.1177/1354067X04044166
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X04044166 [Google Scholar]
  29. Horgan, Mervyn
    2019 “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue – Morality, the Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression7(1): 31–54. 10.1075/jlac.00018.hor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00018.hor [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu, Xianjin
    1944 “The Chinese Concept of Face.” American Anthropologist46: 45–64. 10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Melvin De La Cruz
    2016 “Rituals of Outspokenness and Verbal Conflict.” Pragmatics & Society7 (2): 265–290. 10.1075/ps.7.2.05kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.2.05kad [Google Scholar]
  34. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Saeko Fukushima
    2018 “The Meta-conventionalisation and Moral Order of E-practices: A Japanese Case Study.” Internet Pragmatics: Special Issue – (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions1 (2): 352–378. 10.1075/ip.00016.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00016.kad [Google Scholar]
  35. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House
    2019a “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach.” Pragmatics. doi:  10.1075/prag.19018.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19018.kad [Google Scholar]
  36. 2019b “Introduction: The Pragmatics of Ritual.” Pragmatics. 10.1075/prag.19016.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19016.kad [Google Scholar]
  37. . Forthcoming. “Linguistic Forms, Standards Situations and Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Framework.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
    2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research11 (2): 239–260.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Ritual Public Humiliation: Using Pragmatics to Model Language Aggression”. Acta Linguistica Academica66 (2): 189–208. 10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.3
     https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression – A Position Paper.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue – Morality, the Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression. 10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
  41. Kangasharju, Helena
    2002 “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1447–1471. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00073‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00073-5 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2018 “Impoliteness Online Hate Speech in Online Interactions.” Internet Pragmatics: Special Issue – (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions1 (2): 329–351. 10.1075/ip.00015.kie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00015.kie [Google Scholar]
  43. Levinson, Stephen
    1981 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara, and Paul A. Wilson
    2017 “Shame and Guilt across Cultures.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, ed. byYoung Yun Kim, 1–9. London: Wiley. doi:  10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0260
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0260 [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, Lijing
    2009 “Television and Dispute Resolution as the Fourth Mediation Paradigm: Analysis and Evaluation Based on the ‘Inviting Interested Parties’ Program Model.” Journal of Southwestern College of Politics and Law11: 121–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Lo, Adrienne, and Heidi Fung
    2011 “Language Socialization and Shaming.” InThe Handbook of Language Socialization, ed. byA. Duranti, E. Ochs, and B. B. Schieffelin, 169–189. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444342901.ch7
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Madianou, Mirca
    2011 “News as a Looking Glass: Shame and the Symbolic Power of Mediation.” International Journal of Cultural Studies15 (1): 3–16. 10.1177/1367877911411795
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877911411795 [Google Scholar]
  48. Márquez-Reiter, Rosina, and Michael Haugh
    2019 “Denunciation, Blame and the Moral Turn in Public Life.” Discourse, Context & Media28: 35–43. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Márquez-Reiter, Rosina, and Sarah Orthaber
    2018 “Exploring the Moral Compass: Denunciations in a Facebook Carpool Group.” Internet Pragmatics1 (2): 241–270. 10.1075/ip.00012.mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00012.mar [Google Scholar]
  50. Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tayebi Tahmineh
    2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics132: 91–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  51. Petley, Jacob
    2013 “Public Interest or Public Shame.” InMedia and Public Shaming: Drawing the Boundaries of Disclosure Account, ed. byJ. Petley, 19–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.5040/9780755694518.ch‑002
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755694518.ch-002 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
    2019 “Building Mutual Affection-Based Face in Conflict Mediation: A Chinese Relationship Management Model.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 185–198. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rowbottom, Jacob
    2013 “To Punish, Inform, and Criticize: The Goals of Naming and Shaming.” InMedia and Public Shaming: Drawing the Boundaries of Disclosure, ed. byJ. Petley, 1–18. London: I. B. Tauris. 10.5040/9780755694518.ch‑001
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755694518.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Scheff, Thomas J.
    1988 “Shame and Conformity: The Deference-Emotion System.” American Sociological Review53: 395–406. 10.2307/2095647
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2095647 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2003 “Shame in Self and Society”. Symbolic Interaction26 (2): 239–262. 10.1525/si.2003.26.2.239
     https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.2.239 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schieffelin, Bambi B.
    1986 “Teasing and Shaming in Kaluli Children’s Interactions.” InLanguage Socialization across Cultures, ed. byB. B. Schieffelin, and E. Ochs, 165–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2018 “‘Ya bloody drongo!!!’ Impoliteness as Situated Moral Judgement on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics: Special Issue – (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions1 (2): 271–302. 10.1075/ip.00013.sin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00013.sin [Google Scholar]
  58. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2002 “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (5): 529–545. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  59. 2005 “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research1 (1): 95–119. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  60. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2016 “The Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East–West Debate.” East Asia Pragmatics1 (1): 73–106. 10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084
     https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stewart, Charles
    2015 “Honor and Shame.” InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, ed. byNail J. Smelser, and Paul B. Baltes, 181–184. London: Pergamon. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.12086‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12086-0 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sung, Kyu-Talk
    1998 “An Exploration of Actions of Filial Piety.” Journal of Aging Studies12: 369–386. 10.1016/S0890‑4065(98)90025‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(98)90025-1 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tayebi, Tahmineh
    2016 “Why Do People Take Offence? Exploring the Underlying Expectations.” Journal of Pragmatics101: 1–17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  64. Taylor, Gabriele
    1985 Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2017 “Convention and Ritual (Im)politeness”. InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. byC. Jonathan, H. Michael, and D. Z. Kádár, 171–195. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_8
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_8 [Google Scholar]
  66. Turner, Victor
    1979 “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies6 (4): 465–499. 10.18874/jjrs.6.4.1979.465‑499
     https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.6.4.1979.465-499 [Google Scholar]
  67. Welten, Stephanie C. M., Marcel Zeelenberg, and Seger M. Breugelmans
    2012 “Vicarious Shame.” Cognition and Emotion26 (5): 836–846. 10.1080/02699931.2011.625400
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.625400 [Google Scholar]
  68. Whutnow, Robert
    1989 Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Williams, Bernard A. O.
    1993 Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, Guoshu
    2012 “Analyzing the Concept of Chinese Filial Piety.” InChinese Psychology, ed. byG. S. Yang, 32–59. Peking: China Renmin University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhao, Linsen, and Yongping Ran
    2019 “Impoliteness Revisited: Evidence from Qingmian Threats in Chinese Interpersonal Conflicts.” Journal of Politeness Research15 (2): 257–291. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0027 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19019.ran
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese; mediation; morality; reintegration; ritual frame; shaming

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error