1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 32, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This study presents a corpus-based sociopragmatic investigation into apology responses (ARs) and gender differences in ARs in spoken British English. Using data taken from the recently released Spoken BNC2014, the investigation leads to an adjusted taxonomy of ARs which comprises five categories and several sub-categories. The investigation shows that ‘Lack of response’ is the most typical response, followed by ‘Acceptance’, ‘Rejection’, ‘Evasion’, and ‘Acknowledgement’. The results are discussed in relation to the process of attenuation that apologies have undergone (e.g. Jucker 2019), i.e. apologies are becoming more routinised and less meaningful. The proposed taxonomy is subsequently used to examine the extent to which male and female recipients respond to apologies differently. While the investigation suggests no significant differences in ARs across genders, it has been observed that there is some correlation between ARs and the gender of the apologiser. Finally, the implications and applications of the study are briefly discussed.

© International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an
2021-08-16
2024-12-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.19029.an.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adrefiza, and Jeremy Jones
    2013 “Investigating Apology Response Strategies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Gender and Cultural Perspectives.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics36 (1): 71–101. doi:  10.1075/aral.36.1.04jon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.36.1.04jon [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, Karin
    1996 Conversational Routines in English. London/New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019 “‘Ooh Whoops I’m Sorry! Teenagers’ Use of English Apology Expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics142: 258–269. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aries, Elizabeth
    1996 Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bataineh, Ruba, and Rula Bataineh
    2006 “Apology Strategies of Jordanian EFL University Students. Journal of Pragmatics38 (11): 1901–1927. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bella, Spyridoula
    2014 “A Contrastive Study of Apologies Performed by Greek Native Speakers and English Learners of Greek as a Foreign Language.” Pragmatics24 (4): 679–713. doi:  10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.01bel [Google Scholar]
  7. Bing, Janet, and Victoria Bergvall
    1996 “The Question of Questions: Beyond Binary Thinking.” InRethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice, ed. byVictoria Bergvall, Janet Bing, and Alice Freed, 1–30. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope
    1980 “How and Why Are Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan Community.” InWomen and Language in Literature and Society, ed. bySally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman, 111–136. New York: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Rong, and Dafu Yang
    2010 “Responding to Compliments in Chinese: Has It Changed?” Journal of Pragmatics42: 1951–1963. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, Dongmei
    2017 “Communication Is a Two-Way Street: Instructors’ Perceptions of Student Apologies.” Pragmatics27 (1): 1–32. doi:  10.1075/prag.27.1.01che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.01che [Google Scholar]
  13. Coates, Jennifer
    2013 Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language, 3rd edition. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Deutschmann, Mats
    2003 Apologising in British English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flores Salgado, Elizabeth
    2011 The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies: Developmental Patterns of Mexican Students. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.212
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.212 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuchs, Robert
    2017 “Do Women (Still) Use More Intensifiers than Men? Recent Change in the Sociolinguistics of Intensifiers in British English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22 (3): 345–374. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.22.3.03fuc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.03fuc [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, Erving
    1971 Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Golato, Andrea
    2002 “German Compliment Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (5): 547–571. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00040‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00040-6 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoffman, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nicholas Smith, David Y. W. Lee, and Ylva Berglund
    2008 Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofstede, Geert
    1980 Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmes, Janet
    1989 “Sex Differences and Apologies: One Aspect of Communicative Competence.” Applied Linguistics10 (2): 194–212. doi:  10.1093/applin/10.2.194
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.194 [Google Scholar]
  23. 1995 Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, Sally, and Ulrike Hanna Meinhof
    1997 Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones, Jeremy, and Adrefiza
    2017 “Comparing Apologies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Cultural and Gender Perspectives.” Journal of Politeness Research13 (1): 89–119. doi:  10.1515/pr‑2016‑0033
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0033 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jucker, Andreas
    2018 “Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English.” Corpus Pragmatics2: 375–398. doi:  10.1007/s41701‑018‑0038‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-018-0038-y [Google Scholar]
  27. 2019 “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4 (1): 1–25. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.878
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.878 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jucker, Andreas, and Irma Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. byAndreas Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 229–443. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  29. Katz, Albert N., and Jonathan A. R. Woodbury
    2017 “Gender Differences in Being Thanked for Performing a Favor.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research46: 481–496. doi:  10.1007/s10936‑016‑9449‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9449-8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Limberg, Holger
    2015 “Principles for Pragmatics Teaching: Apologies in the EFL Classroom.” ELT Journal69 (3): 275–285. doi:  10.1093/elt/ccv012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv012 [Google Scholar]
  31. Locke, John L.
    2011 Duels and Duets: Why Men and Women Talk So Differently. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511993404
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993404 [Google Scholar]
  32. Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery
    2017 “The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and Building a Spoken Corpus of Everyday Conversations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22 (3): 319–344. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  33. Murphy, James
    2016 “Apologies Made at the Leveson Inquiry: Triggers and Responses.” Pragmatics and Society7 (4): 595–617. doi:  10.1075/ps.7.4.04mur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.04mur [Google Scholar]
  34. Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman, and James W. Pennebaker
    2008 “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes45: 211–236. doi:  10.1080/01638530802073712
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ogiermann, Eva
    2009 On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.191
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191 [Google Scholar]
  36. Owen, Marion
    1983 Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110907728
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907728 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Cooperation of Multiple Constraints.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 79–112. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson, Jeffrey
    2004 “The Sequential Organization of ‘Explicit’ Apologies in Naturally Occurring English.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37: 291–330. doi:  10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schumann, Karina, and Michael Ross
    2010 “Why Women Apologize More than Men: Gender Differences in Thresholds for Perceiving Offensive Behavior.” Psychological Science21: 1–7. doi:  10.1177/0956797610384150
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384150 [Google Scholar]
  40. Su, Hang
    2020 “Local Grammars and Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: A Case Study of Apology in the History of American English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics21 (1): 109–136. doi:  10.1075/jhp.00038.su
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00038.su [Google Scholar]
  41. Su, Hang, and Naixing Wei
    2018 ‘‘‘I’m Really Sorry about What I Said’: A Local Grammar of Apology.” Pragmatics28 (3): 439–462. doi:  10.1075/prag.17005.su
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17005.su [Google Scholar]
  42. Trosborg, Anna
    1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wainwright, Angela
    2019 “Gender Differences in the Narrative Productions of African American Adults.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology28: 623–638. doi:  10.1044/2018_AJSLP‑18‑0153
     https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0153 [Google Scholar]
  44. Weatherall, Ann
    2002 Gender, Language and Discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Williams, Graham
    2018 Sincerity in Medieval English language and literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑54069‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54069-0 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an
Loading
Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English
Pragmatics 32, 28 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19029.an
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.19029.an
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): apology; apology responses; gender differences; spoken British English

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error