1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Primer for the field investigation of spatial description and conception, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.2.1.02lev-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.2.1.02lev
1992-01-01
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, S. & Keenan, E
    1985 Debris. In T. Shopen (ed.)Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 259-308.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin, B
    1968Tzeltal numeral classifiers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowden, J
    1991Grammaticalization of locatives in Oceanic languages. MA thesis, University of Auckland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowerman, M
    1989 Learning a semantic system: what role do cognitive predispositions play. In M. L. Rice & R. L. Schiefelbusch (eds.)The teachability of language, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, C
    1983 Where do cardinal points come from. Anthropological linguistics25:121-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P
    1991 Spatial conceptualization in Tzeltal. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bühler, K
    1990 [1934]Theory of language: the representational function of language. Transi, by D. F. Goodwin . Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164 [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi, S. & Bowerman, M
    . (in press) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean. Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, E
    1978 Locationals: existential, locative and possessive constructions. In J. Greenberg , Universals of language, Vol 4, 85-126.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, H
    1973 Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, pp.28-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole, M. , Gay, J. , Glick, J. & Sharp, D
    1971The cultural context of learning and thinking: an exploration in experimental anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruse, D. A
    1986Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dasen, P
    1984 The cross cultural study of intelligence: Piaget and the Baoulé. In P. S. Fry (ed.)Changing conceptions of intelligence. Amsterdam: New Holland, pp.107-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Deregowski, J
    1989 Real space and represented space: cross-cultural perspectives. Behavioral & Brain Sciences12:51-119. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00024286
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024286 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fillmore, C
    1975Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club, mimeo.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Friedrich, P
    1969On the meaning of the Tarascan suffixes of space. Memoir 23, Indidana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics. Supplement to UAL, 35(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanks, W
    1990Referential practice: language and lived space in a Maya community. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haviland, J. B
    1986 Complex referential gestures in Guugu Yimidhirr. Unpublished MS.
  19. 1991a The grammaticalization of motion (and time) in Tzotzil. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1991b Projections, transpositions and relativity. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, B
    1989 Adpositions in African languages. Linguistique Africaine77-127.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Herskovits, A
    1986Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hugh-Jones, C
    1979From the milk river: spatial and temporal processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Humphreys, G. W. & Bruce, V
    1989Visual cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jarvella, R. & Klein, W
    1982Speech, place and action. Chicester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M
    1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lawrence, D. & Low, S
    1990 The built environment and spatial form. Annual review of anthropology19:453-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002321
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002321 [Google Scholar]
  28. de Léon, L
    1991a Space-games in Tzotzil: creating a context for spatial reference. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1991b Unpredicted strategies: explorations in the acquisition of locatives in Tzotzil. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1991c Inducing interactions: spatial reference in Tzotzil. Paper to workshop on spatial description in Austronesian and Papuan languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, S
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1986 The semantics/pragmatics/kinesics of space in Guugu Yimidhirr. Unpublished paper presented at theUniversity of Bamberg.
  33. 1987 Minimization and conversational inference. In M. Papi & J. Verschueren , The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp61-129. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.10lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.10lev [Google Scholar]
  34. Levinson, S. & Brown, P
    1991 “Uphill” and “downhill” in Tzeltal. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Levinson, S
    1991a Figure & ground in Mayan spatial description: Tzeltal locatives. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1991b Relativity in spatial description and conception. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Littlejohn, J
    . The Temne house. Sierra Leone Studies. 14:63-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lucy, J. A
    1987Grammatical categories and cognitive processes: an historical, theoretical, and empirical re-evaluation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Chicago, Collegiate Division of the Social Sciences, (in press, CUP).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyons, J
    1977Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MacLaury, R
    1989 Zapotec body-part locatives: prototypes and metaphoric extensions. International Journal of American Linguistics55(2): 119-54. doi: 10.1086/466110
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466110 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marr, D
    1982Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Miller, G. & Johnson-Laird, P
    1976Language and perception. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674421288
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674421288 [Google Scholar]
  43. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B
    1956The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pinker, S
    (ed.) 1985Visual Cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Potegal, M
    (ed.) 1982Spatial abilities: developmental and physiological foundations. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shepard & Hurwitz
    1985 Upward direction, mental rotation and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. In Pinker (1985:Visual Cognition,161-194).
  47. Slobin, D
    1985The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 2 Vols. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stiles-Davis, J. , Kritchevsky, M. & Bellugi, U
    1988Spatial cognition: brain bases and development. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Svorou, S
    1986 On the evolutionary paths of locative expressions. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. 12:515-527.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Talmy, L
    1983 How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (eds.)Spatial orientation: theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press, pp.225-320. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  51. 1985 Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.)Language typology and syntactic description, Vol 3. Cambridge University Press, pp.57-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tambiah, S
    1985Culture, thought and social action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674433748
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674433748 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wassmann, J
    1991 Worlds in mind: the effects of the experience of an outside world on the ‘world-view’ of a community in the Finisterre Range of Papua New Guinea. Working paper, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Weissenborn, J. & Klein, W
    1982Here and there. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pb.iii.2‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iii.2-3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.2.1.02lev
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error