1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

“If he speaks Italian it’s better”: Metapragmatics in court, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.2.2.01jac-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.2.2.01jac
1992-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvarez-Caccamo, C
    (1990) “Metapragmatic awareness in language choice: The public use of standard Galician” Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese. San Antonio, Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Associazione Nazionale Magistrati (ANM)
    (1985) Pentitismo e Garanzie nell’Attuale Realtà Giudiziaria. Torino: Atti del Convegno.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, J. M
    (1979) “Sequencing and shared attentiveness to courtroom proceedings’*. In Psathas, G . (ed.)Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, J. M. and P. Drew
    (1979) Order in court : The organisation of verbal interaction injudicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin, J.L
    (1962) How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baglivo, A
    (1983) Camorra S.pA. Milano: Rizzoli.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloch, M
    (1975) “Introduction”. In Bloch, M . (ed.)Political language and oratory in traditional society. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blom, J.P and J. Gumperz
    (1972) “Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway”. In J.J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.)Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolinger, D
    (1982) “Intonation and its parts”. Language58.3: doi: 10.2307/413847
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/413847 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brenneis, D
    (1987) “Talk and transformation”. Man22.3:499-510. doi: 10.2307/2802502
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2802502 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, P. and S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness : Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Conley, J. and O’Barr, W
    (1990) “Rules versus relationships in small claims disputes”. In Grimshaw, A . (ed.)Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Danet, B
    (1980) “Language in the legal process”. Law and Society Review14:3.445-564.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Leon, L
    (1989) “‘Can you use Spanish words to spell the words?’ Authority and metalanguage in court”. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association. Washington D.C.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fisher, S. and A.D. Todd
    (eds.) (1986) Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Foucault, M
    (1979) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Geertz, C
    (1960) The religion of Java. Glencoe, 111: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, M. C
    (1982) “‘Instigating’: Storytelling as socialprocess”. American Ethnologist9:4.779-819.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gumperz, J
    (1976) “Language, communication and public negotiation”. In P. R. Sanday (ed.)Anthropology and the Public Interest: Fieldwork and Theory. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1982a) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1982b) “Fact and inference in courtroom testimony”. In Gumperz, J . (ed.)Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) “Contextualization cues and metapragmatics: The retrieval of cultural knowledge”. In Lucy, J . (ed.)Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics,
  23. Gumperz, J. and N. Berentz
    (1989) “Transcribing conversational exchanges”. To appear in J. A Edwards and M. Lampen (eds.)Transcribing and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanks, W
    (1990) Referential practices: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: Chicago U.P.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1991) “Metapragmatics and deixis”. In Lucy, John (ed.)Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics,
  26. Jacquemet, M
    (1989) “Power in court: Turning a turncoat into a witness”. Paper presented at88th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association. Washington D.C.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (1991) “Men of honor, men of truth: The case against the Nuova Camorra Organizzata (Naples Italy: 1983–1988)”. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Just, P
    (1988) “Let the evidence fit the crime: Evidence, law and “sociological truth” among the Dou Douggo”. American Ethnologist, 13:43-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kedar, L
    (ed.) (1987) Power through Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Klein, G
    (ed.) (1989) Parlare in Città: Studi di Sociolinguistica Urbana. Galatina: Congedo Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, R
    (1989) “The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse”. Multilingua, 8: 23: 101-130. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.101 [Google Scholar]
  32. Levi, J
    (1985) “Applications of linguistics to the language of legal interactions”. In Bjarkman & Raskin (eds.)The Real- world Linguist: Linguistic Applications in the 1980s. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lind, E. and W. O’Barr
    (1979) “The Social significance of speech in the courtroom”. In Giles & St. Clair (eds.)Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lucy, J
    (ed.) (1991) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maynard, D
    (1984) “The structure of discourse in misdemeanor plea bargaining”. Law & Society Review18:1.75-104. doi: 10.2307/3053481
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3053481 [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Barr, W
    (1984) Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Philips, S
    (1985) “Strategies of clarification in judges’ use of language: From the written to the spoken”. Discourse Processes8. doi: 10.1080/01638538509544625
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544625 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tribunale di Napoli
    (1986) Sentenza d’Appello del Primo Troncone del Processo Abagnale+712, a.k.a. Processo Tbrtora. Napoli: Procura della Repubblica.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sales, I
    (1988) La Camorra, le Camorre. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Silverstein, M
    (1977) “The limits of awareness”. Lecture given to the Harvard Anthropology Seminar. Cambridge, Mass.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1979) “Language structure and linguistic ideology”. In P. Clyne , W. Hanks and C. Hofbauer (eds.)The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1985) “Metapragmatics and metapragmatic function”. In Lucy, J . (ed.)
  43. Voloäinov, V
    (1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [1929]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.2.2.01jac
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error