Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Araki, H
    (1983) Nihongo kara Nihonjin o kangaeru (A study of the Japanese people from the viewpoint of their language). Tokyo: Asahi-Shinbun-Sha.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1983) Keigo Nihonjin Ron (Honorifics: the Japanese). Kyoto: PHP Kenkyuu-jo.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doi, T
    (1973) The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikegami, Y
    (1981) “Sunt” to “Nam” no Gengo-gaku: Gengo to Bunka no Taipologii e no shiron. (Linguistics of “Do” and “Become”: A tentative typological analysis of language and culture). Tokyo: Taishuukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1982) “Hyoogen Koozoo no Hikaku: Suruteki na gengo to Naruteki na gengo” (A comparison in the mechanism of expression: Do-language and Become-language). In Kunihiro (ed.)Nichi-Ei-Go Hikaku Kooza Vol.4: Hassoo to Hyoogen (Comparative studies of Japanese and English Vol.4: Conception and expression). Tokyo: Taishuukan, pp.67-109.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuno, S
    (1978) Danwa no Bumpoo (Grammar of discourse). Tokyo: Taishuukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and emphathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsumoto, Y
    . “Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics12: 403-426. North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tbkunaga, M
    (1985) “A strategy for objective expressions in Japanese”. InJournal of Asian CultureVol.9: 181-198. Graduate Studies in Asian Studies at UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1986) “Affective debris in Japanese: A case study of directional verbs”. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan.
  11. (1988) “A paradox in Japanese pragmatics”. Papers in Pragmatics2(1/2): 84-105. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1988) “Integrating pragmatics into the language instruction: A rule for choice of appropriate expressions in Japanese”, (unpublished paper). Presented at theConference on Innovations in Teaching Chinese and Japanese at Rutgers University, March.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1989) “A paradoxical functions of passives in Japanese pragmatics”. Tb appear in Papers of the LACUS Forum. Linguistics Associations of Canada and the United States.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1990) “Structural dichotomy and pragmatics in Japanese”. Paper presented at theConference on Japanese Linguistics and Language. Middlebury College.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1991a) “Integrating pragmatics and pedagogy: A case of the Japanese passives and causatives”. Gengo Kyooku KenkyuVol.2: 105-114. Institute of Linguistics and Language. Kanda University of International Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1991b) “Semantics of the passive and causative suffixes in Japanese”. Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics Vol.1: 324-338. Chulalongkorn University.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error