Volume 2, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auwera, J. van der
    (1983) “Conditionals and antecedent possibilities”. Journal of Pragmatics7: 297-309. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90016‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90016-4 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazzanella, C
    (1990) “‘Modal’ uses of the Italian indicativo imperfetto in a pragmatic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics14: 439-459. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90100‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90100-R [Google Scholar]
  3. Boer, M. de
    (1987) “The Italian conditional”. Paper presented at theInternational Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dik, S.C
    (1986) “Linguistically motivated knowledge representation”. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 9. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, Ch.J
    (1971) “Types of lexical information”. In D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 370-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraser, B
    (1975) “Hedged performatives”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 187-211.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1980) “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics4: 341-350. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(80)90029‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Grice, H.P
    (1975) “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M.A.K
    . & R. Hasan (1990) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haverkate, H
    (1979) Impositive sentences in Spanish. Theory and description in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1984) Speech acts, speakers and hearers, reference and referential strategies in Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pb.v.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hooper, J.B
    (1975) “On assertive predicates”. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press, 91-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jespersen, O
    (1955) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen-Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Koike, D.A
    (1989) “Requests and the role of deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics13: 187-202. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(89)90010‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90010-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G
    (1972) “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”. In P.M. Peranteau et al(eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rauh, G
    (1983) “Aspects of deixis”. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tübingen: Narr, 9-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Searle, J.R
    (1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1976) “A classification of illocutionary acts”. Language in Society5: 1-23. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  21. Spitzer, L
    (1918) Aufsätze zur romanischen Syntax und Stilistik. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Urmson, J.O
    (1952) “Parenthetical verbs”. Mind61: 480-496. doi: 10.1093/mind/LXI.244.480
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXI.244.480 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error