Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This article explores the process of grammaticalization that has lead to the innovation of a distinct form of negation in Arizona Tewa, a Kiowa-Tanoan language spoken in the U. S. southwest. After reviewing comparative linguistic evidence that clearly establishes the innovative form of the Arizona Tewa negative, the analysis proceeds to examine ethnographic data as a means of understanding an apparent reanalysis of a subordinate clause marker as an obligatory part of negative constructions. Such data provide strong evidence for viewing the powerful role of discourse and language ideological factors in accounting for how this grammatical reanalysis both emerged and ultimately came to be the “preferred” form. Comparative data from Australian languages provides additional evidence for viewing larger discourses as highly influential contexts for grammatical change.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bybee, Joan , Revere Perkins , and William Pagliuca
    (1994) The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coupland, Nikolas , and Adam Jaworski
    (2004) Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation, and ideology. In A. Jaworski , N. Coupland , & D. Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15-51. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dixon, R.M.W
    (1972) The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084987 [Google Scholar]
  5. Douglass, W.H
    (1964) An Introduction to the Western Dessert Language. Oceania Linguistic Monographs, no. 4. Sydney: University of Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans, Nicholas
    (2007) Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 366-431.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Givón, Talmy
    (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hopi Dictionary Project
    (1998) Hopi Dictionary/Hopiikwa Lavaytutuveni: A Hopi English Dictionary of the Third Mesa Dialect with an English Finder List and a Sketch of Hopi Grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopper, Paul J. , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kroskrity, Paul V
    (1993) Language, History, and Identity: Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1998) Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language ideology. In B. Schieffelin , K. Woolard , & P. Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies, Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2005) Tewa and the Kiowa Tanoan languages. In Philipp Strazny (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 2. New York: Fitzroy-Dearborn, pp. 1091-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Labov, William
    (1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word19: 273-309.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leap, William
    (1975) On negation (and what you can do with it). Paper presented at the Annual Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference. Flagstaff, Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehmann, Christian
    (1995) Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose , and Elena Seoane
    (2008) New perspectives on grammaticalization. In Maria Jose Lopez-Couso and Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1075/tsl.76
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76 [Google Scholar]
  18. Meillet, Antoine
    (1912) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12.26: 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramat, Anna Giacalone , and Paul Hopper
    (eds.) (1998) The Limits of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.37
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.37 [Google Scholar]
  20. Seoane, Elena , and Maria Jose Lopez-Couso
    (eds.) (2008) Theoretical and Empircal Issues in Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.77
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77 [Google Scholar]
  21. Silverstein, Michael
    (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press, pp. 219-259. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑491280‑9.50016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Speirs, Randall H
    (1966) Some aspects of the structure of Rio Grande Tewa. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
  23. Trager, George L
    (1946) An outline of Taos grammar. In H. Hoijer (ed.), Linguistic Structures of Native North America. New York: Viking Fund, pp. 184-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Watkins, Laurel J
    (1984) A Grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yegerlehner, John F
    (1957) Phonology and morphology of Hopi-Tewa. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
  26. Zaharlick, Anne Marie
    (1977) Picuris syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, American University.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error