1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

The present study examines two commonly-used Japanese verbs of cognition, WAKARU and SHIRU, in naturally occurring conversation, and demonstrates that these verbs are expressions of position and attitude that are relevant both to individual speakers (i.e., subjective uses) and to relational activities among participants (i.e., intersubjective uses). My naturally occurring conversation data supports Lee (2006) that there seems to be a general principle that speakers’ lexical choices are governed by information type, but the link between speakers’ lexical choices and information type is not so absolute but fluid. In fact, while 24% of my data are those where only WAKARU is expected to be used or only SHIRU is expected to be used, 74% are those in which both WAKARU and SHIRU are possible regardless of information type. A closer analysis of such ‘fluid’ examples suggests that speakers choose one expression over another to express their personal attitudes and emotions toward the content of information and toward the other conversation participants. More specifically, their choice for WAKARU manifests such features as experiencer perspective and speaker empathy, and in contrast, their choice for SHIRU is characterized as observer perspective. The study is firmly in keeping with a usage-based perspective on language (e.g., Barlow and Kemmer 2000; Bybee 2006), which takes as its starting point the idea that language use shapes language form and meaning, and offers new insights into the interactional and performative nature of language by addressing the two commonly used verbs of cognition in Japanese conversation from a viewpoint of discourse pragmatics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.1.06sad
2010-01-01
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akatsuka, Noriko
    (1979) Epistemology, Japanese syntax, and linguistic theory. Papers in Japanese Linguistics6: 7-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aoki, H. , Y. Matsugu , M. Miyashita , T. Ono , and M. Sadler
    (To appear) Japanese corpus. University of Arizona: Department of East Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow, Michael , and Suzanne Kemmer
    (eds.) (1999) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benveniste, Emile
    (1971) Problems in general linguistics. Trans. by M.E. Meek . Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L
    (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82.4: 711-733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl, Östen
    (1997) Egocentricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7.1: 37-77. doi: 10.1075/fol.7.1.03dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.7.1.03dah [Google Scholar]
  7. Du Bois, J. , S. Schuetze-Coburn , S. Cumming , and D. Paolino
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Iwasaki, Shoich
    (1993) Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: Theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kamio, Akio
    (1979) On the notion speaker’s territory of information: A functional analysis of certain sentence-final forms in Japanese. In G. Bedell , E. Kobayashi , M. Muraki (eds.), Explorations in linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue. Tokyo: Kenkyusha, pp. 213-231.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1990) Joohoo no nawabari-riron: Gengo no kinooteki bunseki [The territory of information theory: A functional analysis of language]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2002) Zoku joohoo no nawabari-riron: Gengo no kinooteki bunseki [New territory of information theory: A functional analysis of language]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kato, Yukiko
    (2002) “Chigai-ga wakaru otoko” wa donna otoko ka [What kind of person is someone who is called “chigai-ga wakaru otoko”]. Bulletin of the International Student Center Gifu University, pp. 97-109.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Koyama-Murakami, Nobuko
    (2001) Grounding and deixis: A study of Japanese first-person narrative. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
  15. Lee, Kiri
    (2006) Territory of information theory and emotive expressions in Japanese: A case observed in shiranai and wakaranai . In S. Suzuki (ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 191-207. doi: 10.1075/pbns.151.10lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.151.10lee [Google Scholar]
  16. Lyons, John
    (1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In R.J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: Wiley, pp. 101-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Subjecthood and subjectivity. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Maynard, Senko K
    (1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion, and voice in the Japanese language. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.24
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.24 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2002) Linguistic emotivity: Centrality of place, the topic-comment dynamic, and ideology of pathos in Japanese discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.97
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.97 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2005) Expressive Japanese: A Reference Guide for sharing emotion and empathy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Miura, Akira
    (1983) Japanese words & their uses. Rutland, Vermont: Charles E. Tuttle Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Quinn, Charles J
    (1994)  Uchi/soto: Tip of a semiotic iceberg? ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ knowledge in the grammar of Japanese. In J.M. Bachnik & C.J. Quinn (eds.), Situated meaning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 247-294.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Scheibman, Joanne
    (2000)  I dunno ... A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics32: 105-124. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00032‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00032-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2001) Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In J. Bybee and P.J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 61-89. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.04sch [Google Scholar]
  25. (2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.11
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.11 [Google Scholar]
  26. Shinzato, Rumiko
    (2003) Experiencing self versus observing self: The semantics of stative extensions in Japanese. Language Sciences25: 211-238. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(01)00025‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00025-0 [Google Scholar]
  27. Suzuki, Satoko
    (ed.) (2006) Emotive communication in Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.151
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.151 [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Anthony Mulac
    (1991) A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization vol. II: Focus on types of grammatical markers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 313-329. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
  29. Tien, C. , S. Izuhara , and S. Kim
    (eds.) (2007) Ruigigo tsukaiwake jiten [Synonym “How to chose” Dictionary]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.1.06sad
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error