1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper reports on some recent work on affectivity, or emotive involvement, in conversational storytelling. After presenting the approach, some case studies of the display and management of affectivity in storytelling in telephone and face-to-face conversations are presented. The analysis reconstructs the display and handling of affectivity by both storyteller and story recipient. In particular, I describe the following kinds of resources: - the verbal and segmental display: Rhetorical, lexico-semantic, syntactic, phonetic-phonological resources; - the prosodic and suprasegmental vocal display: Resources from the realms of prosody and voice quality; - visual or "multimodal" resources from the realms of body posture and its changes, head movements, gaze, and hand movements and gestures. It is shown that the display of affectivity is organized in orderly ways in sequences of storytelling in conversation. I reconstruct (a) how verbal, vocal and visual cues are deployed in co-occurrence in order to make affectivity in general and specific affects in particular interpretable for the recipient and (b) how in turn the recipient responds and takes up the displayed affect. As a result, affectivity is shown to be managed by teller and recipient in storytelling sequences in conversation, involving both the reporting of affects from the story world as well as the negotiation of in-situ affects in the here-and-now of the storytelling situation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
2010-01-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamberg, M
    (1997) Emotion talk(s). The role of perspective in the construction of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The language of emotions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 209-225. doi: 10.1075/z.85.15bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.85.15bam [Google Scholar]
  2. Christmann, G.B. , and S. Günthner
    (1996) Sprache und Affekt. Die Inszenierung von Entrüstung im Gespräch. Deutsche Sprache1: 1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Couper-Kuhlen, E
    (1999) Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In W. Bublitz & U. Lenk (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 11-32. doi: 10.1075/pbns.63
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63 [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew, P
    (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction31.3-4: 295-325. doi: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew, P. , and E. Holt
    (1988) Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems35.4: 398-417. doi: 10.2307/800594
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800594 [Google Scholar]
  6. Emerson, R.M. , and S.L. Messinger
    (1977) The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problems25: 121-34. doi: 10.2307/800289
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800289 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffman, E
    (1978) Response cries. Language54: 787–815. doi: 10.2307/413235
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, C
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225-246.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs , E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370-404. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
  11. . (in press) Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia. To appear in D. Barth- Weingarten , E. Reber & M. Selting (eds.) Prosody in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.23.29goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.29goo [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, M.H
    (1980) Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of descriptive sequences. Sociological Inquiry50: 303-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00024.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00024.x [Google Scholar]
  13. (1990) He-Said-She-Said. Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1997) By-play: Negotiating evaluation in storytelling. In G.R. Guy , C. Feagin , D. Schriffin & J. Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language, Vol. 2: Social interaction and discourse structures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 77-102. doi: 10.1075/cilt.128.08goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.128.08goo [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, C. , and M.H. Goodwin
    (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1: 1-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, M.H. , and C. Goodwin
    (2000) Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 239-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Günthner, S
    (1997) The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The language of emotions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 247-275. doi: 10.1075/z.85.19gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.85.19gun [Google Scholar]
  18. (1999) Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics31: 685-708. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2000) Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110919974
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110919974 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2005) "Dichte Konstruktionen". InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures)43 (www.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist/issues/43/index.htm)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harré, R
    (1986) An outline of the social constructionist viewpoint. In R. Harré (ed.), The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 2-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hochschild, A.R
    (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85.3: 551-575. doi: 10.1086/227049
    https://doi.org/10.1086/227049 [Google Scholar]
  23. (1983) The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, G
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219-248. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1990) List construction as a task and interactional resource. In G. Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 63-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Klewitz, G. , and E. Couper-Kuhlen
    (1999) Quote-unquote. The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics. 9.4: 459-485.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindblom, B
    (1990) Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the HandH theory. In W.J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 273-296.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Local, John , and Gareth Walker
    (2008) Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk28-6: 723-747. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.037
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mandelbaum, J
    (1991/1992) Conversational non-cooperation: An exploration of disattended complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction25: 97-138. doi: 10.1080/08351819109389359
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819109389359 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ochs, Elinor , and Bambi Schieffelin
    (1989) Language has a heart. Text 9.1: 7-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ogden, R
    (2006) Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics38: 1752-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  32. . (in press) Prosodic constructions in making complaints. To appear in D. Barth-Weingarten , E. Reber & M. Selting (eds.) (in press). Prosody in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd [Google Scholar]
  33. Peräkylä, A. , and J. Ruusuvuori
    (2006) Facial expression in an assessment. In H. Knoblauch , B. Schnettler , J. Raab & H.G. Soeffner (eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 127-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9: 219-29. doi: 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  35. Quasthoff, U
    (1980) Erzählen in Gesprächen. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Quasthoff, U.M
    (2001) Erzählen als interaktive Gesprächsstruktur. In K. Brinker , et al . (eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. HSK 16. Volume 2: Gesprächslinguistik. Berlin etc.: de Gruyter, pp. 1293-1309.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Quasthoff, U.M. , and T. Becker
    (eds.) (2005) Narrative interaction. Amsterdam/Philadepphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sin.5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sin.5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Raymond, Geoffrey , and John Heritage
    (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society35: 677-705. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  39. Reber, E
    (2008) Affectivity in talk-in-interaction: Sound objects in English. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Potsdam.
  40. Ryave, A
    (1978) On the achievement of a series of stories. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 113-132. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50011-2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, H
    (1971) Das Erzählen von Geschichten innerhalb von Unterhaltungen. In R. Kjolseth & F. Sack (eds.), Zur Soziologie der Sprache. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 307-314. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑05383‑5_24
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05383-5_24 [Google Scholar]
  42. (1986) Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversation. Poetics15: 127-138. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90036‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, E.A
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  44. Scheutz, H
    (1992) Apokoinukonstruktionen. Gegenwartssprachliche Erscheinungsformen und Aspekte ihrer historischen Entwicklung. In A. Weiss (ed.), Dialekte im Wandel. Göppingen: Kümmerle, S., pp. 243-264.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2005) Pivot constructions in spoken German. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 103-128. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.07sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.07sch [Google Scholar]
  46. Selting, Margret
    (1994) Emphatic speech style - with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22.1994: 375-408. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90116‑3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics39: 483-526 ( doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Selting, M. ; P. Auer , B. Barden , J. Bergmann , E. Couper-Kuhlen , S. Günthner , U. Quasthoff , C. Meier , P. Schlobinski , and S. Uhmann
    (1998) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). InLinguistische Berichte 173: 91-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Selting, Margret , et al
    (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). To appear inGesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion(www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stivers, Tanya
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41.1: 31-57. doi: 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilkinson, Sue , and Celia Kitzinger
    (2006) Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly69.2: 150-182. doi: 10.1177/019027250606900203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900203 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error