1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF

Abstract

Attempts at reinvigorating mythical sensations of shared values and cultural identities happen particularly at times of dislocatory events in a community’s history, when ‘the national Self’ is perceived to be threatened by external forces. Such a critical moment for China was the collision between a US surveillance plane and a Chinese F-8 jet fighter on April 1, 2001, and the ensuing diplomatic standoff between the US and China. As the Chinese authorities and the state media viewed this incident in a series of ambiguous incidents involving the US, it was concluded that the collision had been the inevitable outcome of US hegemonism intended to provoke China. It is this concurrence of events, triggering feelings of disempowerment of the Self that causes recurrent flurries of heated anti-Other rhetoric. Boundaries of exclusion/inclusion along cultural, historical and political lines set up the Other as the negative mirror of the Self, which as a consequence is positively reasserted. Informed by insights from Language Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis, this paper sets out to examine linguistic tools of alienation and empowerment in the Chinese official press narratives about the collision, comprising the Chinese-language , its English equivalent and the English-language . It aims to trace processes of meaning generation, in particular discursive practices of an ideological nature, such as antagonistic portrayals of in- and outgroups, hegemonic exercise of power, as well as naturalized conceptualizations of contingent processes, structures and relations.

© 2010 International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.3.02lam
2010-01-01
2024-12-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.3.02lam
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, B
    (1983) Imagined communities: Reflections of the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bau, B
    (2001) Dzai Jungmei zhuangji shijian yingchi de jiching beihou: meiti chaujung he minyi kungzhi [Behind the emotion after the Sino-Am. EP3 collision: media manipulation and public opinion control]. Dandai Zhongguo yanjiu [Contemp. Chinese Studies] 2.73: 74-76.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M
    (1986) Speech genres and other late essays ( V.W. McGee , Trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckett, K
    (1996) Culture and the politics of signification: The case of child sexual abuse. Social Problems43: 57-76. doi: 10.2307/3096894
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3096894 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beller, M. , and J. Leerssen
    (eds.) (2007) Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. A critical survey. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Billig, M. , S. Condor , D. Edwards , M. Gane , D. Middleton , and A. Radley
    (1988) Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brady, A.M
    (2006) Guiding hand: The role of the CCP Central Propaganda department in the current era. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture3.1: 57-77.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brantlinger, P
    (1990) Crusoe’s footprints: Cultural studies in Britain and America. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan, W.S
    (2002) Media discourse and image construction: A study of New York Times’s reports about the Hainan spy-pane collision incident. Hong Kong Journal of Sociology3: 123-146.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang, D.J
    (2001) Tsung hungkuan hishi shiye jiedu mei “jung” chunji pengzhuang shigu [Interpreting/decoding the ‘Sino’-American EP3 collision incident from a macro-historical point of view]. Chinese Communist Party Studies 27.5: 104-106.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, M
    (2002) The Standoff- what is unsaid? A pragmatic analysis of the conditional marker ‘if’. Discourse & Society 13.3: 309-317. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013003050
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003050 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, J.Y.S. , and K.L Ngok
    (2004) The 2001 “Spy” plane incident revisited: The Chinese perspective. The Journal of Chinese Political Science9.1: 63-83.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Clausen, L
    (2005) Intercultural encounters in the global transmission of news: the perception and production of cultural images. Nordicom Review 26.2: 103-131.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Clifford, J
    (1988) The predicament of culture: Twentieth-Century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Creutz-Kämppi, K
    (2008) The Othering of Islam in a European context. Nordicom Review 29.2: 295-308.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai, J.H
    (2001) Behind global spectacle and national image making. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique9.1: 161-186. doi: 10.1215/10679847‑9‑1‑161
     https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-9-1-161 [Google Scholar]
  17. Donnelly, E
    (2004) The US-China EP-3 incident: Legality and realpolitik. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 9.1: 25-42. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/9.1.25
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dyserinck, H. , and M. Fischer
    (eds.) (1985) Internationale Bibliographie zur Geschichte und Theorie der Komparatistik. Stuttgart: Anton-Hiersemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Edgar, A. , and P. Sedgwick
    (1999) Key concepts in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Entman, R.M
    (1991) Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents?Journal of Communications 41.4: 6-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1991.tb02328.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43.4: 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Fill, A
    (1986) ‘Divided illocution’ in conversational and other situations – and some of its implications. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 24.1: 27-34. doi: 10.1515/iral.1986.24.1‑4.27
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1986.24.1-4.27 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fursich, E
    (2002) How can global journalists represent the ‘other’?Journalism 3.1: 57-84. doi: 10.1177/146488490200300102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300102 [Google Scholar]
  24. Galtung, J. , and M.H. Ruge
    (1965)  The structure of foreign news . Journal of Peace Research1: 64-90.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gamson, W. , and A. Modigliani
    (1989) Media discourse as a symbolic contest: Constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95: 1-37. doi: 10.1086/229213
     https://doi.org/10.1086/229213 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gans, H.J
    (1979) Deciding what’s news. NY: Pantheon.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Graber, D.A
    (1989) Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gramsci, A
    (1971) Prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gries, P.H
    (2001) Tears of rage: Chinese nationalist reactions to the Belgrade embassy bombing. The China Journal46, July: 25-43. doi: 10.2307/3182306
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3182306 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gries, P.H. , and K.P. Peng
    (2002) Culture clash? Apologies East and West”in Journal of Contemporary China11.30: 173-178. doi: 10.1080/106705601200912000
     https://doi.org/10.1080/106705601200912000 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall, S. , T. Jefferson , J. Clarke , and B. Roberts
    (1978) Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order. New York: Holmes and Meier.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hao, Y.F. , and L. Su
    (2007) Beautiful imperialist or warmongering hegemon? Contemporary Chinese views of the US. In D. Farber (ed.), What they think of us: International perceptions of the U.S. since 9/11. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 74-94.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Höijer, B
    (2007) A socio-cognitive perspective on ideological horizons in meaning-making. In B. Höijer (ed.), Ideological horizons in media and citizen discourses. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 33-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoffmann, J
    (1980) Völkerbilder in Ost und West. Auswahlbibliographie. Dortmund: Rheinländisch Westfälische Auslandsgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hook, S.W. , and X.Y. Pu
    (2006) Framing Sino-American relations under stress: A re-examination of news coverage of the 2001 spy plane crisis. Asian Affairs: an American Review33.3: 167-183. doi: 10.3200/AAFS.33.3.167‑183
     https://doi.org/10.3200/AAFS.33.3.167-183 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, Y. , and S.M. Leung
    (2005) Western-led press coverage of mainland China and Vietnam during the SARS crisis: Reassessing the concept of ‘Media representation of the Other’. Asian Journal of Communication15.3: 302-318. doi: 10.1080/01292980500261621
     https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01292980500261621 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jenkins, R
    (1996) Social identity. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kan, S.A. , R. Best , C. Bolkcom , R. Chapman , R. Cronin , K. Dumbaugh , S. Goldman , M. Manyin , W. Morrison , R. O’Rourke , and D. Ackerman
    (2001) China-US aircraft collision incident of April 2001: Assessments and policy implications. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, October10, 1-37.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Keefe, J
    (2002) A tale of ‘two very sorries’ redux. Far Eastern Economic Review, March 21, 30-33.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kluver, A.R
    (2002) The logic of new media in international affairs. New Media & Society 4.4: 499-517. doi: 10.1177/146144402321466787
     https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466787 [Google Scholar]
  41. Laclau E. , and C. Mouffe
    (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lams, L
    (2005) Language and politics in the Chinese English-language newspaper The China Daily. The Stockholm Journal of East-Asian Studies15: 109-137.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2007) Continuity or change in language practices of the Chinese official and media discourse since the late 1990s?Paper presented atInternational Conference “Defining the Field: Themes in Contemporary China Studies”, Centre for Research in the Arts,Cambridge University,13-15April.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (2008) From collision to compromise: “We are sorry” – one utterance, two interpretations. A discourse-analytical approach to the official rhetoric and the international media coverage of the US surveillance plane collision with the Chinese jet fighter. Paper presented at IAMCR International Media Research Congress, Stockholm, 20-25 July.
  45. Lan, P.F
    (2003) Rational reflections on the plane collision incident. Chinese education and Society 36.1: 73-78. doi: 10.2753/CED1061‑1932360173
     https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932360173 [Google Scholar]
  46. Le, E
    (2006) The spiral of ‘anti-other rhetoric’: Discourses of identity and the international media echo. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.22 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee, G.B
    (2003) Re-taking tiger mountain by television: Televisual socialization of the contemporary Chinese consumer”. In G.B. Lee (ed.), Chinas unlimited: Making the imaginaries of China and Chineseness. London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 55-78.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lewis, M.K
    (2002) An analysis of state responsibility for the Chinese-American airplane collision incident. The New York University Law Review 77 ( Nov.): 1404-1441.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Littlewood, R. , and M. Lipsedge
    (1997) Aliens and Alienists: Ethnic minorities and psychiatry. London: Routledge, 3rd ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lippmann, W
    (1922) Public opinion. New York: McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Moerman, M
    (1974) Accomplishing ethnicity. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 54-68.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mowlana, H
    (1996) Global communication in transition: The end of diversity?London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483327518
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327518 [Google Scholar]
  53. Morson, G.S. , and C. Emerson
    (1990) Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Moscovici, S
    (1998) The history and actuality of social representations. In U. Flick (ed.), The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209-247.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mulvenon, J
    (2002) Civil-Military relations and the EP-3 crisis: A content analysis. China Leadership Monitor1 (winter): 1-11.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Neibu tongxun [Internal Report]. News Bureau, CCP Central Propaganda Department 2003/15: 4.
  57. Olausson, U
    (2007) The ideological horizons of citizenship. National media as discursive bridge. In B. Höijer (ed.), Ideological horizons in media and citizen discourses. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 51-75.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. O’Sullivan, T. , J. Hartley , D. Saunders , M. Montgomery and J. Fiske
    (1994) Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pageaux, D.H
    (1983) La recherche en littérature comparé en France. Aspects et problèmes. Paris: S.F.L.G.C.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Pan, C.X
    (2004) The ‘China threat’ in American self-imagination: The discursive construction of ‘other’ as power politics. Alternatives29: 305-331.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Potter, J. , and M. Wetherell
    (1992) Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. PRC Foreign Ministry Press Release
    (2001) Spokesman on Chinese military airplane bumped by a U.S. military surveillance plane, April 1, 2001. Available atwww.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/9519.html (accessed on 10/04/2001).
  63. Pugsley, P.C
    (2006) Constructing the hero: Nationalistic news narratives in contemporary China. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 3.1: 77-92.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Renwick, N. , and Q. Cao
    (2003) Modern political communication in China. In G.D. Rawnsley & M.Y. Rawnsley (eds.), Political Communications in Greater China. London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 62-82.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Riggins, S.H
    (ed.) (1997) The language and politics of exclusion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Said, E.W
    (2003) [1978] Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Shen, S
    (2007) “Holding nationalist flags against red flags” – anti-American icons in contemporary China and their reconstruction by the public (1999-2003). East Asia24: 229-250. doi: 10.1007/s12140‑007‑9016‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-007-9016-x [Google Scholar]
  68. Slingerland, E. , E.M. Blanchard , and L. Boyd-Judson
    (2007) Collision with China: conceptual metaphor analysis, somatic marking, and the EP-3 Incident. International Studies Quarterly51.1: 53-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2478.2007.00439.x
     https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00439.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M. , P.R.R. White , and K. Aijmer
    (2007) Presupposition and ‘taking-for-granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In A. Fetzer & G.E. Lauerbach (eds.), Political Discourse in the Media. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pp. 31-74. doi: 10.1075/pbns.160.05sim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.160.05sim [Google Scholar]
  70. Siebenmann, G
    (2004) La investigación de las imágenes mentales - Aspectos metodológicos. In J.M.López de Abiada & A. López Bernasocchi (eds.), Imágenes de España en culturas y literaturas europeas (siglos XVII-XVIII). Madrid: Verbum, pp. 339-349.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Stanzel, F.K. , I. Weiler , and W. Zacharasiewicz
    (eds.) (1999) Europäischer Völkerspiegel. Imagologisch- ethnographische Studien zu den Völkertafeln des fruühen 18. Jahrhunderts. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Carl Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Tajfel, H
    (1981) Human groups and social categories studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Terrill, R
    (2003) The new Chinese empire and what it means for the US. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Tian, D.X. , and C.C. Chao
    (2008) The American hegemonic responses to the US-China mid-air plane collision. InInternational Journal of Communication 2: 1-19.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Torode, G
    (2001) Sides knew risk of close encounters, South China Morning Post, April 6, p.7
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Dijk, T.A.
    (1984) Structures of international news: A case study of the world’s press. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Van Dijk, T.A
    (1988) A news analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the Press. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. (1989) Social cognition and discourse. In H. Giles and R.P. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of social psychology and language. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 163-183.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Verschueren, J
    (1999) Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Weisman, S.R
    (2001) The art and artifice of apologizing to China. InThe New York Times, 13 April, A16.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Wodak, R. , R. de Cillia , M. Resigi , and K. Liebhart
    (1999) The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010002002
     https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  82. Xu Wu
    (2002) Another collision: How mainstream Chinese and American newspapers framed the Sino- US spy plane collision. M.A. thesis, University of Florida.
  83. Yee, A.S
    (2004) Semantic ambiguity and joint deflections in the Hainan negotiation. China: An International Journal 2.1: 53-82.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, H
    (2001) Culture and apology: The Hainan island incident. World Englishes 20.3: 383-391. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00222
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00222 [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, J.Y. , Q. Qiu , and G.T. Cameron
    (2004) A contingency approach to the Sino-US conflict Resolution. Public Relations Review30: 391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang, X.L
    (2005) News framing: A comparison of the New York Times and the People’s Daily coverage of Sino-US spy plane collision of April 1, 2001. M.A. thesis, University of Florida.
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20.3.02lam
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Alienation; Antagonistic portrayals; China Daily accounts; Chinese official media; Discourse analysis; Discursive practices; Empowerment; EP-III surveillance plane; Hegemony; Myth-making; Othering; Pragmatics; Spy plane collision; US/China diplomatic standoff

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error