The question-response system in Mandarin conversation

References

1. Ameka, Felix
   1992 “Interjections: The Universal yet Neglected Part of Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics18(2–3): 101–118. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90048‑G
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G [Google Scholar]
2. Bolden, Galina B.
   2009 “Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation.” Communication Monographs76(2): 121–143. 10.1080/03637750902828446
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828446 [Google Scholar]
3. Bolden, Galina B. and Jeffrey D. Robinson
   2011 “Soliciting Accounts with Why-interrogatives in Conversation.” Journal of Communication, 61(1), 94–119. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2010.01528.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01528.x [Google Scholar]
4. Canavan, Alexandra, and George Zipperlen
   1996 CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect LDC96S55. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chao, Yuen Ren
   1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Yiya, and Agnes Weiyun He
   2001 “Dui Bu Dui as a Pragmatic Marker: Evidence from Chinese Classroom Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics33 (9): 1441–1465. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00084‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00084-9 [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, Robert L.
   1984 “Chinese Question Forms and Their Meanings.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics12(1): 86–147.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chiu, Hsin-fu
   2012 “Méiyou-/Búshì-(’No-’) Prefaced Turns in Talk Show Interaction-Constitutive Elements of Entertainment Broadcasts in Taiwan.” Language and Linguistics13 (3): 391–435.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chu, Chauncey Cheng-Hsi
   1998 A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chui, Kawai
    2002 “Ritualization in Evolving Pragmatic Functions: A Case Study of Dui.” Language and Linguistics3 (4): 645–663.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2012 “Some Truths and Untruths about Prosody in English Question and Answer Sequences.” InQuestions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. byJan P. de Ruiter, 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.009 [Google Scholar]
12. Curl, Traci S.
    2006 “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1257–1280. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Curl, Traci S. and Paul Drew
    2008 Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. 10.1080/08351810802028613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613 [Google Scholar]
14. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions.” Linguistics49 (2): 365–390. 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
15. Dong, Hongyuan
    2009 Issues in the Semantics of Mandarin Questions. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Egbert, Maria and Vöge, Monika
    2008 “Wh-interrogative Formats Used for Questioning and Beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why.” Discourse Studies, 10(1), 17–36. 10.1177/1461445607085583
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085583 [Google Scholar]
17. Enfield, Nicholas J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2010 “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 2615–2619. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001 [Google Scholar]
18. Enfield, Nicholas J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Katariina Harjunpää, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Tiina Keisanen, and Mirka Rauniomaa
    2019 “Polar Answers.” Journal of Linguistics55(2): 277–304. 10.1017/S0022226718000336
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000336 [Google Scholar]
19. Gasde, Horst-Dieter
    2001 “Yes/No Questions in Mandarin Chinese Revisited.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics24: 47–101. 10.21248/zaspil.24.2001.127
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.24.2001.127 [Google Scholar]
20. Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage
    1990 “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology19(1): 283–307. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
21. Hakulinen, Auli
    2001 “Minimal and Non-Minimal Answers to Yes-No Questions.” Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association11(1): 1–15. 10.1075/prag.11.1.01hak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.1.01hak [Google Scholar]
22. Hayashi, Makoto, and Shuya Kushida
    2013 “Responding with Resistance to Wh-Questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction46(3): 231–255. 10.1080/08351813.2013.810407
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.810407 [Google Scholar]
23. Heine, Bernd
    2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics51(6). 1205–1247. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
24. Heritage, John
    2002 “Designing Questions and Setting Agendas in the News Interview.” InStudies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. byP. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum, 57–90. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heritage, John
    2010 “Questioning in Medicine.” InWhy do you ask? The Functions of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. byA. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich, 42–68. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
27. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” InQuestions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. byJ. P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013 [Google Scholar]
28. Huang, C.-T. James
    1991 “Modularity and Chinese A-Not-A Questions.” InInterdisciplinary Approaches to Language, ed. byC. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, 305–332. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3818‑5_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_16 [Google Scholar]
29. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
30. Keevallik, Leelo
    2012 “Compromising Progressivity: ‘No’-Prefacing in Estonian.” Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association22 (1): 119–146. 10.1075/prag.22.1.05kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.1.05kee [Google Scholar]
31. Kendrick, Kobin H.
    2010 Epistemics and Action Formation in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kendrick, Kobin H.
    2018 “Adjusting Epistemic Gradients: The Final Particle Ba in Mandarin Chinese Conversation.” East Asian Pragmatics, 5–26. 10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120
    https://doi.org/10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120 [Google Scholar]
33. Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie
    2013 “Ani ‘No’-Prefaced Responses to WH-Questions as Challenges in Korean Conversation.” Japanese/Korean Linguistics20: 383–398.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kim, Stephanie Hyeri
    2015 “Resisting the Terms of Polar Questions through Ani (‘No’)-Prefacing in Korean Conversation.” Discourse Processes52 (4): 311–334. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 [Google Scholar]
35. Koshik, Irene
    2003 “Wh-questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51–77. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
36. Koshik, Irene
    2005 Alternative Questions Used in Conversational Repair. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 193–211. 10.1177/1461445605050366
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050366 [Google Scholar]
37. Lee, Heeju, Danjie Su, and Hongyin Tao
    2017 “A Crosslinguistic Study of Some Extended Uses of What-Based Interrogative Expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean.” Chinese Language and Discourse8(2): 137–173. 10.1075/cld.00001.lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00001.lee [Google Scholar]
38. Lerner, Gene H.
    2004 Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125 [Google Scholar]
39. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Li, Xiaoting
    2014 “Leaning and Recipient Intervening Questions in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics67: 34–60. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011 [Google Scholar]
41. Li, Yen-hui Audrey
    1992 “Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics1(2): 125–155. 10.1007/BF00130234
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130234 [Google Scholar]
42. Lu, Wen-Ying
    2005 Sentence-Final Particles as Attitude Markers in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of IllinoisatUrbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980/2004 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. Hong Kong: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. McCawley, James D.
    1994 “Remarks on the Syntax of Mandarin Yes-No Questions.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics3 (2): 179–194. 10.1007/BF01736126
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01736126 [Google Scholar]
45. Norrick, Neal R.
    2009 “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics41(5): 866–891. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005 [Google Scholar]
46. Qin, Longlu
    2012 A Conversational Study of the Particle Ne in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review, 939–967. 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
48. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language, 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
49. Sadock, Jerrold M., and Arnold M. Zwicky
    1985 “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” InLanguage Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. byTimothy Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology102 (1): 161–216. 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
51. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol.1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
52. Shao, Jingmin
    1996 Xiandai Hanyu Yiwen Ju Yanjiu [Questions in Mandarin Chinese]. Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shao, Jingmin and Yan Zhu
    2002 “The Affirmative Inclination of the Shi-Bu-Shi+VP Question and Its Typological Significance.” Chinese Teaching in the World, 2, 23–36.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
    2001 Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
55. Stivers, Tanya
    2005 “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction38 (2): 131–158. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1 [Google Scholar]
56. Stivers, Tanya
    2018 “How We Manage Social Relationships Through Answers to Questions: The Case of Interjections.” Discourse Processes56(3): 191–209. 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1441214
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1441214 [Google Scholar]
57. Stivers, Tanya, and Nick J. Enfield
    2010 “A Coding Scheme for Question–Response Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics42(10): 2620–2626. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
58. Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi
    2010 “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in Society39(1): 1–25. 10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
59. Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction43(1): 3–31. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
60. Tsai, I-Ni
    2011 Grammar as Situated Practices: Conversational Practices of Two Mandarin Yes/No Question Formats in Talk-in-Interaction. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Tsai, I-Ni
    2019 “A Multimodal Analysis of Tag Questions in Mandarin Chinese Multi-Party Conversation.” InMultimodality in Chinese Interaction, ed. byXiaoting Li and Tsuyoshi Ono, 300–332. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110462395‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-011 [Google Scholar]
62. Turk, Monica J.
    2006 Projection in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: Grammar and Social Interaction in Question-Answer Sequences. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wang, Yu-Fang
    2008 “Beyond Negation – the Roles of Meiyou and Bushi in Mandarin Conversation.” Language Sciences30 (6): 679–713. 10.1016/j.langsci.2006.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.08.001 [Google Scholar]
64. Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, and Meng-Ying Ling
    2007 “From Informational to Emotive Use: Meiyou (‘No’) as a Discourse Marker in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies9 (5): 677–701. 10.1177/1461445607081271
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607081271 [Google Scholar]
65. Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin
    2010 “Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies12 (2): 241–267. 10.1177/1461445609346922
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346922 [Google Scholar]
66. Wang, Wei
    2020 “Grammatical Conformity in Question-Answer Sequences: The Case of Meiyou in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies22 (5). 10.1177/1461445620916371
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620916371 [Google Scholar]
67. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    2004 Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
68. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina, and John Heritage
    2017 “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin” InEnabling Human Conduct, ed. byGeoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage, 273–298. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.273.14wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.14wu [Google Scholar]
69. Yang, Xiaodong, and Martina Wiltschko
    2016 “The Confirmational Marker Ha in Northern Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics104: 67–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004 [Google Scholar]
70. Yin, Shichao
    1999 “Shuo Yuqici Ha he Ha Ziju [On Modal Particle ha and ha-sentences].” Fangyan [Dialect], 2, 95–103.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Yu, Anne Jui-Ying
    2004 “Discourse Functions of Negative Meiyou in Taiwan Mandarin.” Unpublished MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Yu, Guodong, and Paul Drew
    2017 “The Role of Búshì (不是) in Talk about Everyday Troubles and Difficulties.” East Asian Pragmatics2 (2): 195–227. 10.1558/eap.34673
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.34673 [Google Scholar]
73. Zeng, Xiao-Li, Philippe Martin, and Georges Boulakia
    2004 “Tones and Intonation in Declarative and Interrogative Sentences in Mandarin.” Paper presented at theInternational Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing, China.