Dealing with missing participants in the opening phases of a videoconference

References

1. Aoki, Paul M., Margaret H. Szymanski, and Allison Woodruff
   2006 “Media Spaces in the Mobile World.” CSCW: 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arminen, Ilkka, and Minna Leinonen
   2006 “Mobile Phone Call Openings: Tailoring Answers to Personalized Summonses.” Discourse Studies8 (3): 339–368. 10.1177/1461445606061791
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061791 [Google Scholar]
3. Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli
   2016 “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (4): 290–309. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 [Google Scholar]
4. Asmuß, Birte
   2002 Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation. Analysen deutsch-dänischer Verhandlungen [Structural markers of disagreement in intercultural communication. Analysis of German-Danish business meetings]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110960884
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110960884 [Google Scholar]
5. Asmuß, Brite
   2015 “Multimodal Perspectives on Meeting Interaction.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, ed. byJoseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg, 277–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.013 [Google Scholar]
6. Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
   2009 “Meeting Talk: An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication46 (1): 3–22. 10.1177/0021943608326761
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608326761 [Google Scholar]
7. Asmuß, Birte
   2007 “What Do People Expect from Public Services? Requests in Public Service Encounters.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies381: 66–83.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Atkinson, Mick A., Edward C. Cuff, and John R. E. Lee
   1978 “The Recommencement of a Meeting as a Member’s Accomplishment.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 133–153. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50012‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50012-4 [Google Scholar]
9. Beers Fägersten, Kristy, Elin Holmsten, and Una Cunningham
   2010 “Multimodal Communication and Meta-Modal Discourse.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. byRotimi Taiwo, 145–163. Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch009
   https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch009 [Google Scholar]
10. Boden, Deirdre
    1994 The Business of Talk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bruxelles, Sylvie, Luca Greco, and Lorenza Mondada
    2009 “Pratiques de transition: ressources multimodales pour la structuration de l’activité.” InMéthodologies d’analyse de situations coopératives de conception: corpus MOSAIC, ed. byFrançoise Détienne, and Véroniche Traverso, 221–301. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caspi, Aviv
    2020 “Punctuality and Coordination Failures in the Remote Workplace.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3659642or10.2139/ssrn.3659642
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659642
13. Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
    2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies12 (4): 419–442. 10.1177/1461445610370126
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126 [Google Scholar]
14. Dawidowicz, Marta, Karen Schramm, Roberta Abbate, Doris Abitzsch, Ilona Feld-Knapp, Katrin Hofmann, Sabine Hoffmann, Gabriella Perge, and Ewout van der Knaap
    2019 “Erfahrungsbasiertheit, kollegiale Kooperation und videobasierte Reflexion als Prinzipien des LEELULehrerInnenbildungsprojekts.” https://leelu.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/164/2019/08/Konzeptpapier-zur-Lehrerbildungsmaßnahme-im-LEELU-Projekt-Endfassung-2019.pdf
15. Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
    2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1700–1718. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006 [Google Scholar]
16. Drew, Paul, and Kobin H. Kendrick
    2018 “Searching for Trouble: Recruiting Assistance through Embodied Action.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality1 (1). 10.7146/si.v1i1.105496
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i1.105496 [Google Scholar]
17. Due, Brian L., and Christian Licoppe
    2020 “Video-Mediated Interaction (VMI): Introduction to a Special Issue on the Multimodal Accomplishment of VMI Institutional Activities.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies in Human Sociality3 (3): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Due, Brian L., and Christian Licoppe
    2021 “Video-Mediated Interaction (VMI).” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality3 (3). 10.7146/si.v3i3.123836
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.123836 [Google Scholar]
19. Egbert, Maria
    1997 “Schisming: The Collaborative Transformation from a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction30 (1): 1–51. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_1 [Google Scholar]
20. González-Martínez, Esther, and Marcelo Giglio
    2020 “Introduire les points soumis à discussion lors d’une réunion. Une analyse conversationnelle longitudinale.” Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique721: 31–61. 10.26034/tranel.2020.2898
    https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2020.2898 [Google Scholar]
21. Goffman, Erving
    1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York, The Free Press of Glencoe.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Harper, Richard, Rod Watson, and Christian Licoppe
    2017 “Interpersonal Video Communication as a Site of Human Sociality. A Special Issue of Pragmatics.” Pragmatics27 (3): 319–350.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placemen.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper
    1981 “Politeness Markers in English and German.” InConversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. byFlorian Coulmas, Vol.21, 157–185. The Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton Publishers. 10.1515/9783110809145.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809145.157 [Google Scholar]
25. Ilomäki, Sakari, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2020 “From Appearings to Disengagements: Openings and Closings in Video-Mediated Tele-Homecare Encounters.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality3 (3). 10.7146/si.v3i3.122711
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.122711 [Google Scholar]
26. Keisanen, Tiina., Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pentti Haddington
    2014 “Suspending Action.” InMultiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. byPentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 109–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.187.04kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.04kei [Google Scholar]
27. Kendrick, Kobin H.
    2021 “The ‘Other’ Side of Recruitment: Methods of Assistance in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics1781: 68–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015 [Google Scholar]
28. Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
    2014 “The Putative Preference for Offers over Requests.” InRequesting in Social Interaction, ed. byPaul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slsi.26.04ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.04ken [Google Scholar]
29. Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
    2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (1): 1–19. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436 [Google Scholar]
30. Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale, and Joseph A. Allen
    2020 “Well, Now What Do We Do? Wait…: A Group Process Analysis of Meeting Lateness.” International Journal of Business Communication57 (3): 302–326. 10.1177/2329488417696725
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417696725 [Google Scholar]
31. Licoppe, Christian, and Sylvaine Tuncer
    2014 “Attending to a Summons and Putting Other Activities ‘On Hold’.” InMultiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. byPentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 167–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.187.06lic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.06lic [Google Scholar]
32. Licoppe, Christian, and Julian Morel
    2012 “Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (2): 399–429. 10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 [Google Scholar]
33. Licoppe, Christian
    2017a “Showing Objects in Skype Video-Mediated Conversations: From Showing Gestures to Showing Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics1101: 63–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
34. Licoppe, Christian
    2017b “Skype Appearances, Multiple Greetings and ‘Coucou’. The Sequential Organization of Video-Mediated Conversation Openings.” Pragmatics27 (3): 351–386.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lindstrøm, Anna
    2005 “Language as Social Action. A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. byAuli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.17.11lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.11lin [Google Scholar]
36. Markman, Kris M.
    2009 “ʽSo What Shall We Talk Aboutʼ: Openings and Closings in Chat-Based Virtual Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication46 (1): 150–170. 10.1177/0021943608325751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608325751 [Google Scholar]
37. Mehus, Siri
    2005 “The Micro-Organization of Taking a Break: Transitions Between Task and Non-Task Activities at Work.” Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, April 16–18, Texas, Linguistic Forum481: 125–137.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mlynář, Jakub, Esther González-Martínez, and Denis Lalanne
    2018 “Situated Organization of Video-Mediated Interaction: A Review of Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Studies.” Interacting with Computers30 (2): 73–84. 10.1093/iwc/iwx019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx019 [Google Scholar]
39. Mondada, Lorenza
    2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 1977–97. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
40. Mondada, Lorenza
    2006 “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies8 (1): 117–129. 10.1177/1461445606059561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561 [Google Scholar]
41. Mondada, Lorenza
    2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities Within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics21 (2): 289–316. 10.1080/10350330.2011.548650
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.548650 [Google Scholar]
42. Mondada, Lorenza
    2004 “Ways of ‘Doing Being Plurilingual’ in International Work Meetings.” InSecond Language Conversation, ed. byRod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 27–60. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mondada, Lorenza, and Reinhold Schmitt
    2010 “Zur Multimodalität von Situationseröffnungen.” InSituationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. byLorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mondada, Lorenza
    2010 “Eröffnungen und Prä-Eröffnungen in medienvermittelter Interaktion: das Beispiel Videokonferenzen.” InSituationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. byLorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt, 277–334. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Muñoz, Arantxa Santos
    2016 “Attending Multi-Party Videoconference Meetings: The Initial Problem.” Language@Internet131, article 3.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Nielsen, Mie Femø
    2013 “ʽStepping Stonesʼ in Opening and Closing Department Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication50 (1): 34–67. 10.1177/0021943612465182
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612465182 [Google Scholar]
47. Oittinen, Tuire, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    2015 “Openings in Technology-Mediated Business Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics851: 47–66. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
48. Oittinen, Tuire
    2018 “Multimodal Accomplishment of Alignment and Affiliation in the Local Space of Distant Meetings.” Culture and Organization24 (1): 31–53. 10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189 [Google Scholar]
49. Oloff, Florence
    2019 “Some Systematic Aspects of Self-Initiated Mobile Device Use in Face-to-Face Encounters.” Journal für Medienlinguistik2 (2): 195–235. 10.21248/jfml.2019.21
    https://doi.org/10.21248/jfml.2019.21 [Google Scholar]
50. Raclaw, Joshua, and Cecilia E. Ford
    2015 “Meetings as Interactional Achievements: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” InThe Science of Meetings at Work: The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, ed. byJoseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.012 [Google Scholar]
51. Rasmussen Hougaard, Gitte
    2008 “Membership Categorization in International Business Phonecalls: The Importance of ‘Being International’.” Journal of Pragmatics40 (2): 307–332. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.011 [Google Scholar]
52. Relieu, Marc
    2009 “ʽMobile Phone Workʼ: Disengaging and Engaging Mobile Phone Activities with Concurrent Activities.” InThe Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices, ed. byRich Ling, and Scott W. Campbell, 215–229. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rosenbaun, Laura, Sheizaf Rafaeli, and Dennis Kurzon
    2016 “Blurring the Boundaries between Domestic and Digital Spheres: Competing Engagements in Public Google Hangouts.” Pragmatics261: 291–314.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ruhleder, Karen, and Brigitte Jordan
    2001 “Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay-Generated Trouble.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work101: 113–138. 10.1023/A:1011243905593
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011243905593 [Google Scholar]
55. Oshima, Sae, and Birte Asmuß
    2018 “Mediated Business: Living the Organizational Surroundings – Introduction.” Culture and Organization24:1: 1–10. 10.1080/14759551.2017.1387965
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1387965 [Google Scholar]
56. Schmitt, Reinhold
    2006 “Interaction in Work Meetings.” Revue française de linguistique appliquée11 (2): 69–84. 10.3917/rfla.112.0069
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.112.0069 [Google Scholar]
57. Rogelberg, Steven G., Clifton W. Scott, Brett Agypt, Jason Williams, John E. Kello, Tracy McCausland, and Jessi L. Olien
    2014 “Lateness to Meetings: Examination of an Unexplored Temporal Phenomenon.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology23 (2): 323–341. 10.1080/1359432X.2012.745988
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.745988 [Google Scholar]
58. Sutinen, Marike
    2014 “Negotiating Favourable Conditions for Resuming Suspended Activities.” InMultiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. byPentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 137–165. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.187.05sut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.05sut [Google Scholar]
59. Svennevig, Jan
    2012 “Interaction in Workplace Meetings.” Discourse Studies14 (1): 3–10. 10.1177/1461445611427203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427203 [Google Scholar]
60. Svennevig, Jan
    2008 “Exploring Leadership Conversations.” Management Communication Quartely21 (4): 529–536. 10.1177/0893318907313717
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907313717 [Google Scholar]
61. Svenning, Jan, and John E. Ruchinskas
    1984 “Organizational Teleconferencing.” InThe New Media. The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, ed. byRonald E. Rice, 217–248. Beverly Hills/CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Szymanski, Margaret H.
    1999 “Re-Engaging and Dis-Engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
63. Veyrier, Claire Antoine
    2015 “Multiactivité et multimodalité dans les réunions à distance.” Reseaux (6): 11–37.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wasson, Christina
    2006 “Being in Two Spaces at Once: Virtual Meetings and Their Representation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology16 (1): 103–130. 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.1.103
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.1.103 [Google Scholar]