A corpus-based study on contrast and concessivity of the connective -ciman in Korean

References

1. Baranzini, Laura, and Alda Mari
   2019 “From Epistemic Modality to Concessivity: Alternatives and Pragmatic Reasoning per absurdum”. Journal of Pragmatics142: 116–138. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.002 [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, D. M.
   1998 “Cancellative Markers: A Core/Periphery Approach.” Pragmatics8: 515–541. 10.1075/prag.8.4.03bel
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.4.03bel [Google Scholar]
3. Blakemore, Diane
   1987 Semantic Constrains in Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blakemore, Diane
   1989 “Denial and Contrast: A Relevance Theoretic Analysis of But.” Linguistics and Philosophy12: 15–38. 10.1007/BF00627397
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627397 [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephan Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
6. Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy
   2006 Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Choi, Hyenpay
   1937 Wulimalpon. [Korean Grammar]. Seoul: Top Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dascal, Marcelo, and Katriel Tamar
   1977 “Between Semantics and Pragmatics: The Two Types of ‘but’ – Hebrew ‘aval’ and ‘ela’.” Theoretical Linguistics4: 143–172. 10.1515/thli.1977.4.1‑3.143
   https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1977.4.1-3.143 [Google Scholar]
9. Fraser, Bruce
   1990 “An Approach to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics14: 383–395. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90096‑V
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V [Google Scholar]
10. Fraser, Bruce
    1998 “Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” InDiscourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, eds. byA. H. Jucker, and Y. Ziv, 301–326. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.15fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.15fra [Google Scholar]
11. Gray, Bethany, and Douglas Biber
    2014 “Stance Markers.” InCorpus Pragmatics, eds. byKarin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grice, Paul
    1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Halliday, M. A., and R. Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
14. He, Wung
    1977 Wuliyeysmalpon [Grammar of Old Korean]. Seoul: Saymmwunhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke, and Arnulf Deppermann
    2016 “A Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: ICH WEIß NICHT as a Resource for Dispreferred Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics106: 97–114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
16. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2005 Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2009 Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2016 Meaning in Linguistic Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602469.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602469.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Lakoff, Robin
    1971 “If’s, and’s and but’s about Conjunction.” InStudies in Linguistic Semantics, eds. byC. Filmore, and D. Langenden, 114–149. New York: Holt, Reinhard and Winston. 114–149.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lee, Huyca, and Conghuy Lee
    1999 Theyksuthu Pwunsekcek Kwuke Emiuy Yenkwu [A Text-Analytic Approach to Korean Endings]. Seoul: Hankwukmwunhwasa
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Hye-Kyung
    2002 “Towards a New Typology of Connectives with Special Reference to Conjunction in English and Korean.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 851–866. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00065‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00065-0 [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Hye-Kyung
    2015 “A Corpus-Pragmatic Analysis of Wuli.” Discourse and Cognition22(3): 59–78. 10.15718/discog.2015.22.3.59
    https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2015.22.3.59 [Google Scholar]
23. Lee, Hyo Sang
    1991 Tense, Aspect and Modality: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Suffix in Korean from a Typological Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.
24. Lee, Iksep, and Hongpin Im
    1983 Kwukemwunpeplon. [Korean Grammar]. Seoul: Tayhaksa.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, Keedong
    1993 “The Pragmatic Function of the Connective Nuntey.” Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 5(1): 119–135.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lee, Keum-Hee
    2018 Pocosa manun kyelhaphyeng yenkyel phyohyeney tayhaye: -cimanun, -tamanun, -(u)kkamanun lyu cwungsimulo. [Final endings + particle Maneun on coupled forms focused mainly -jimaneun, -damaneun, -eulkkmaneun]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 86: 63–88.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lee, Unkyeng
    2000 Kwukeuy Cepsokemi Yenkwu [A Study of Korean Conjunctive Suffixes]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
    1998 The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.53 [Google Scholar]
30. Nam, Kisim, and Yengkun Ko
    1983 Phyocwunkwukemwunpeplon. [Grammar of the Standard Korean]. Seoul: Top Publishing
    [Google Scholar]
31. Park, Jae-Yeon
    2014 “Hankwuke Yenkyelemi Uymi Hwakcangeyseuy Hwanyuwa Unyu [Metonymy and Metaphor in the Semantic Extensions of Korean Connective Endings].” Kwukehak [Journal of Korea Linguistics] 70: 117–155.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Park, Yong-Yae
    1999 “The Korean Connective Nuntey in Conversational Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics31:191–218. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00060‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00060-5 [Google Scholar]
33. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
34. Schourup, Lawrence
    1985 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999 The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sohn, Ho-Min
    2013 Korean. Seoul: Korea University Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Second edition with postface). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sweetser, Eve
    1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
39. Weatherall, Ann
    2011 “I Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction44(4): 317–337. 10.1080/08351813.2011.619310
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619310 [Google Scholar]
40. Yoon, Phyenghyen
    1989 Kwukeuy Cepsokemiey Tayhan Yenkwu. [A study of Korean Conjunctive Suffixes]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cheonnam National University. Korea.
41. Zafiu, Rodica
    2018 Epistemic and Evidential Markers in the Rhetorical Context of Concession. Journal of Pragmatics128: 116–127. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.008 [Google Scholar]