oa Knowledge types and presuppositions

References

1. Ancarno, Clyde S.
   2015 “When are Public Apologies ‘Successful’? Focus on British and French Apology Press Uptakes.” Journal of Pragmatics84: 139–153. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.015 [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, John
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beaver, David I.
   2001 Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bekalu, Mesfin A.
   2006 “Presupposition in News Discourse.” Discourse & Society17: 147–172. 10.1177/0957926506060248
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060248 [Google Scholar]
5. Benoit, William L.
   1997 “Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication.” Public Relations Review23: 177–186.   10.1016/S0363‑8111(97)90023‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0 [Google Scholar]
6. Bentley, Joshua M.
   2015 “Shifting Identification: A Theory of Apologies and Pseudo-apologies.” Public Relations Review41: 22–29. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.011 [Google Scholar]
7. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain
   1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics5: 196–213. 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
9. Boyd, David P.
   2011 “Art and Artifice in Public Apologies.” Journal of Business Ethics104: 299–309. 10.1007/s10551‑011‑0915‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0915-9 [Google Scholar]
10. Cels, Sanderijn
    2015 “Interpreting Political Apologies: The Neglected Role of Performance.” Political Psychology36: 351–360. 10.1111/pops.12092
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12092 [Google Scholar]
11. Coombs, Timothy, and Sherry Holladay
    2008 “Comparing Apology to Equivalent Crisis Response Strategies: Clarifying Apology’s Role and Value in Crisis Communication.” Public Relations Review34: 252–257. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001 [Google Scholar]
12. Compton, Josh
    2016 “Sorry Sorries: Image Repair After Regretted Apologies.” Public Relations Review42: 353–358. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.01.002 [Google Scholar]
13. De La Rosa, John Paul O., and Lorna B. Castro
    2016 “Is It Too Late Now to Say Sorry? The Language of Public Apologies in the Contexts of American and Philippine Television.” i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching6: 29–44. 10.26634/jelt.6.2.5979
    https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.6.2.5979 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gonzalez-Cruz, Maria Isabel
    2012 “Apologizing in Spanish: A Study of the Strategies Used by University Students in Las Palmas De Gran Canaria.” Pragmatics22:543–565. 10.1075/prag.22.4.01gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.4.01gon [Google Scholar]
16. Kampf, Zohar
    2009 “Public (non-)apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 2257–2270. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007 [Google Scholar]
17. Kampf, Zohar
    2013 “The Discourse of Public Apologies: Modes of Realization, Interpretation and Mediation.” InPublic Apology Between Ritual and Regret, ed. byDaniël Cuypers, Daniel Janssen, Jacques Haers, and Barbara Segaert, 145–165. Netherlands: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401209533_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209533_009 [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany
    2006 “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies.” Discourse & Society17: 715–737. 10.1177/0957926506068429
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506068429 [Google Scholar]
19. Hays, Jeffrey
    2008 “Filipino Character and Personality: Hiya, Amor Propio, Emotions, and the Influences of Catholicism, Asia, and Spain.” March20 2020 Http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Philippines/sub5_6c/entry-3867.html
20. Huang, Yan
    2007 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hunston, Suzanne, and Thompson, Geoffrey
    (eds.) 2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Lasquety-Reyes, Jeremiah
    2016 “In Defense of Hiya as a Filipino Virtue.” Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East26: 66–78. 10.1080/09552367.2015.1136203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2015.1136203 [Google Scholar]
23. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
24. Lewis, David
    1979 “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic8: 339–359. 10.1007/BF00258436
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258436 [Google Scholar]
25. MacLachlan, Alice
    2015 “‘Trust Me, I’m Sorry’: The Paradox of Public Apology.” The Monist98 (4): 441–456. 10.1093/monist/onv023
    https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onv023 [Google Scholar]
26. Marrus, Michael R.
    2006 Official Apologies and the Quest for Historical Justice. Toronto: University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster (2021) S.v. “Public Figure.” https://www.merriam/webster.com/dictionary/public%20figure
28. Mojica, Leonisa
    2004 “Apology Strategies Perceived to be Appropriate by Filipino-speaking Couples.” Philippine Journal of Linguistics34: 27–40.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Murphy, James
    2015 “Revisiting the Apology as a Speech Act: The Case of Parliamentary Apologies.” Journal of Language and Politics14: 175–204. 10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur [Google Scholar]
30. Myers, Cayce
    2016 “Apology, Sympathy, and Empathy: The Legal Ramifications of Admitting Fault in U.S. Public Relations Practice.” Public Relations Review42: 176–183. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.10.004 [Google Scholar]
31. Nobles, Melissa
    2008 The Politics of Official Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   10.1017/CBO9780511756252
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756252
32. Oclaret, Venjie N.
    2013 “Apology Strategies of Filipino and Filipino-Chinese Third Year High School Students.” (Unpublished research paper) Philippine Normal University–Manila, Manila, Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ogiermann, Eva
    2009 On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.191
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191 [Google Scholar]
34. Page, Ruth
    2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of pragmatics62: 30–45. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003 [Google Scholar]
35. Papi, Marcella B.
    2003 “Implicitness.” InHandbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. byJan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/hop.3.imp2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.3.imp2 [Google Scholar]
36. Saarinen, Tania
    2008 “Persuasive Presuppositions in OECD and EU Higher Education Policy Documents.” Discourse Studies10: 341–359. 10.1177/1461445608089915
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608089915 [Google Scholar]
37. Sbisà, Marina
    1999 “Ideology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition.” InLanguage and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVol.1, ed. byJef Verschueren, 492–509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Searle, John
    1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
39. Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken
    1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sperber, Dan, and Deirde Wilson
    1986  Relevance: Communication & Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sperber, Dan, and Deirde Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication & Cognition. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stalnaker, Robert C.
    2002 “Pragmatic Presupposition.” InPragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol. IV: Presupposition, Implicature and Indirect Speech Acts, ed. byAsa Kasher, 46–62. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Stephen, Matthew D.
    2015 “‘Can You Pass the Salt?’ The Legitimacy of International Institutions and Indirect Speech.” European Journal of International Relations21: 768–792. 10.1177/1354066114563417
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114563417 [Google Scholar]
44. Towner, Emil B.
    2010 “Truly Public Apologies: Third-party Participation in Rwandan Apologetic Rhetoric.” Qualitative Research Reports in Communication11: 63–69. 10.1080/17459430903582228
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430903582228 [Google Scholar]
45. Yule, George
    2006 The Study of Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2000 “Cognitive Discourse Analysis.” March10 2021 www.discursos.org/unpublished%20articles/cogn-dis-anal.htm
47. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2004 “Knowledge and News.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses49:71–86.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2005 “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production: A CDA Perspective.” InA New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. byRuth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 71–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.13.07dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13.07dij [Google Scholar]
49. Weyeneth, Robert R.
    2001 “The Power of Apology and the Process of Historical Reconciliation.” The Public Historian23 (3): 9–38. 10.1525/tph.2001.23.3.9
    https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2001.23.3.9 [Google Scholar]
50. Zhanghong, Xiu, and Yanan Li
    2020 “A Pragmatic Study of Apologies Posted on Weibo by Chinese Celebrities.” International Journal of Literature and Arts8 (2): 52–61. 10.11648/j.ijla.20200802.14
    https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20200802.14 [Google Scholar]