Didn’t she say to you, “Oh my God! In Pafos?”

References

1. Acuña, Virginia
   2020 “Staging Mental Discursive Processes and Reactions: The Construction of Direct Reported Thought (DRT) in Conversational Storytelling”. Language in Society50 (2): 235–57.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acuña, Virginia
   2021 “The Construction of Future and Hypothetical Dialogues in Third-party Complaints as Enactments of a Subsequent Direct Complaint”. Journal of Pragmatics1811: 68–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.014
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.014 [Google Scholar]
3. Antaki, Charles
   2003 “The Uses of Absurdity”. InAnalyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. byHarry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar
   1990 “Claim-backing and Other Explanatory Genres in Talk”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology91: 279–292. 10.1177/0261927X9094004
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X9094004 [Google Scholar]
5. Archakis, Argiris, and Dimitris Papazachariou
   2008 “Prosodic Cues of Identity Construction: Intensity in Greek Young Women’s Conversational Narratives”. Journal of Sociolinguistics12 (5): 627–647. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00385.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00385.x [Google Scholar]
6. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. byMichael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
8. Bublitz, Wolfram
   2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-communicative Act”. InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
9. Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Alexandra D’Arcy
   2009 “Localized Globalization: A Multi-local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like”. Journal of Sociolinguistics13 (3): 291–331. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00412.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00412.x [Google Scholar]
10. Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations”. Language66 (4): 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
11. Clift, Rebecca
    2007 “Getting There First: Non-narrative Reported Speech in Interaction”. InReporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. byElizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 120–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fetzer, Anita
    2020 “‘And I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics1571: 89–100. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Fetzer, Anita, and Daniel Weiss
    2020 “Doing Things with Quotes: Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics1571: 84–88. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001 [Google Scholar]
14. Fotiou, Constantina
    2015 “An Empirical Study of English in Cypriot Greek Conversations and Print Media”. PhD diss.University of Essex
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fotiou, Constantina
    2017a “English–Greek Code-switching in Greek Cypriot Magazines and Newspapers – An Analysis of Its Textual Forms and Functions”. Journal of World Languages4 (1): 1–27. 10.1080/21698252.2017.1385922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2017.1385922 [Google Scholar]
16. Fotiou, Constantina
    2017b “English Discourse Markers in Cypriot Greek”. InResearchers in Progress II. Languages in Contact: Languages with History. Proceedings of the 2nd UCY-LC International Forum of Young Researchers, ed. byPedro J. Molina Muñoz, 103–116. Nicosia: Language Centre – University of Cyprus.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fotiou, Constantina
    2018 “A Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English Compound Verbs.” Lingua2151: 1–26. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
18. Fotiou, Constantina
    2019 “Debunking a Myth: The Greek Language in Cyprus Is Not Being Destroyed. A Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English Codeswitching”. International Journal of Bilingualism23 (6): 1358–84. 10.1177/1367006918786466
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918786466 [Google Scholar]
19. Fotiou, Constantina
    2020 ““Θέλεις huge sample για να φκάλεις valid statistical results [You want a huge sample to generate valid statistical results]”: A Conversational Analysis of Cypriot Greek – English Codeswitching”. InProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ed. byMaria Chondrogianni, Simon Courtenage, Geoffrey Horrocks, Amalia Arvaniti, and Ianthi Tsimpli. London: Westminster Computation and Linguistics Group, pp.93–105.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fotiou, Constantina
    2022 “English in Cyprus: The Now and Then of English in a Former British Colony”. English Today: 1–7. 10.1017/S0266078422000268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078422000268 [Google Scholar]
21. Fotiou, Constantina, and Ioli Ayiomamitou
    2021 ““We Are in Cyprus, We Have to Use Our Language, Don’t We?” Pupils’ and Their Parents’ Attitudes towards Two Proximal Linguistic Varieties”. Linguistics and Education631: 100931. 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100931
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100931 [Google Scholar]
22. Fotiou, Constantina, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
    2022 “A Small Island with Big Differences? Folk Perceptions in the Context of Dialect Levelling and Koineization”. Frontiers in Communication61. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.770088
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.770088 [Google Scholar]
23. Goffman, Erving
    1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Lebanon: University Press of New England.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1990a He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1990b “Retellings, Pretellings and Hypothetical Stories”. Research on Language and Social Interaction24 (1–4): 263–276. 10.1080/08351819009389342
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389342 [Google Scholar]
27. Golato, Andrea
    2012 “Impersonal Quotation and Hypothetical Discourse”. InQuotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. byIsabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 3–36. Amsterdam, Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.15.04gol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.04gol [Google Scholar]
28. Goodwin, Charles
    2007 “Interactive Footing”. InReporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interactioned. byElizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Haakana, Markku
    2007 “Reported Thought in Complaint Stories”. InReporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. byElizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 150–78. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Haberland, Hartmut
    1986 “Reported Speech in Danish”. InDirect and Indirect Speech, ed. byFlorian Coulmas, 219–253. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.219 [Google Scholar]
31. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement”. InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Holt, Elizabeth
    2000 “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech”. Research on Language and Social Interaction33 (4): 425–454. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04 [Google Scholar]
33. Holt, Elizabeth
    2007 “‘I’m Eyeing Your Chop Up Mind’: Reporting and Enacting”. InReporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. byElizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Irvine, Judith Temkin
    1996 “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles”. InNatural Histories of Discourse, ed. byMichael Silverstein, and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Koester, Almut, and Michael Handford
    2018 “It’s Not Good Saying: ‘Well It Might Do That or It Might Not’: Hypothetical Reported Speech in Business Meetings”. Journal of Pragmatics1301: 67–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lehner, Adrienne
    1989 “Remembering and Representing Prose: Quoted Speech as a Data Source”. Discourse Processes121: 105–125. 10.1080/01638538909544721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538909544721 [Google Scholar]
38. Mayes, Patricia
    1990 “Quotation in Spoken English”. International Journal Studies in Language14 (2): 325–363. 10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may [Google Scholar]
39. Mohammad, Abeer, and Camilla Vásquez
    2015 “‘Rachel’s Not Here’: Constructed Dialogue in Gossip”. Journal of Sociolinguistics19 (3): 351–71. 10.1111/josl.12125
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12125 [Google Scholar]
40. Myers, Greg
    1999 “Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussions”. Applied Linguistics20 (3): 376–401. 10.1093/applin/20.3.376
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.376 [Google Scholar]
41. Park, Innhwa
    2018 “Reported Thought as (Hypothetical) Assessment”. Journal of Pragmatics1291: 1–12. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.003 [Google Scholar]
42. Pascual, Esther, and Emilia Królak
    2018 “The ‘Listen to Characters Thinking’ Novel: Fictive Interaction as Narrative Strategy in English Literary Bestsellers and their Spanish and Polish Translations”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics16 (2): 399–430. 10.1075/rcl.00016.pas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00016.pas [Google Scholar]
43. Pascual, Esther
    2014 Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.47 [Google Scholar]
44. Pascual, Esther, and Todd Oakley
    2017 “Fictive Interaction”. InCambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byBarbara Dancygier, 347–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.022 [Google Scholar]
45. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims”. Human Studies91: 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
46. Pujolar, Joan
    2001 Gender, Heteroglossia and Power: A Sociolinguistic Study of Youth Culture. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809121
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809121 [Google Scholar]
47. Sandler, Sergeiy
    2016 Fictive Interaction and the Nature of Linguistic Meaning. InThe Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing 55], ed. byEsther Pascual, and Sergeiy Sandler, 23–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.55.02san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.02san [Google Scholar]
48. Sandler, Sergeiy, and Esther Pacual
    2019 “In the Beginning There Was Conversation”. Pragmatics29 (2): 250–276. 10.1075/prag.18047.san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18047.san [Google Scholar]
49. Sandlund, Erica
    2014 “Prescribing Conduct: Enactments of Talk or Thought in Advice-Giving Sequences”. Discourse Studies16 (5): 645–66. 10.1177/1461445614539065
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614539065 [Google Scholar]
50. Sams, Jessie
    2010 “Quoting the Unspoken: An Analysis of Quotations in Spoken Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics421: 3147–3160. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.024 [Google Scholar]
51. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
52. Simmons, Katie, and Amanda LeCouteur
    2011 “‘Hypothetical Active-voicing’: Therapists ‘Modelling’ of Clients’ Future Conversations in CBT Interactions”. Journal of Pragmatics431: 3177–3192. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002 [Google Scholar]
53. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narratives”. InDirect and Indirect Speech, ed. byFlorian Coulmas, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.311 [Google Scholar]
54. Tannen, Deborah
    2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
55. Trester, Anna Marie
    2009 “Discourse Marker ‘Oh’ as a Means for Realizing the Identity Potential of Constructed Dialogue in Interaction”. Journal of Sociolinguistics13 (2): 147–68. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00402.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00402.x [Google Scholar]
56. Weiss, Daniel
    2020 “Analogical Reasoning with Quotations? A Spotlight on Russian Parliamentary Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics1551: 101–110. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.008 [Google Scholar]
57. Winchatz, Michaela R., and Alexander Kozin
    2008 “Comical Hypothetical: Arguing for a Conversational Phenomenon”. Discourse Studies10 (3): 383–405. 10.1177/1461445608089917
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608089917 [Google Scholar]