1887
image of Understandable public anger
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the ten years from 2008 onwards the banking sector was constantly in the spotlight. Blame for the financial crisis and concern regarding controversial government bailouts were followed by public outrage about inflated bonuses, money laundering and false reporting. Over this period, banks deployed a range of legitimation strategies to salvage their reputation. This paper proposes a modified typology of legitimation strategies based on previous research ( ), and examines how these are used by in the “letter to shareholders” published by the chairs of the five main UK-based banks over the ten years following the crisis. The strategies are analysed in terms of their object, target and interdiscursive features, and the particular persuasive roles of narrative and emotion are underlined.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20065.bre
2021-07-27
2021-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abulof, Uriel
    2015 “Normative Concepts Analysis: Unpacking the Language of Legitimation.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology18 (1): 73–89. 10.1080/13645579.2013.861656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.861656 [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeze, Ruth
    2012 “Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon.” Discourse & Society23 (1): 3–18. 10.1177/0957926511431511
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2016 “Negotiating Alignment in Newspaper Editorials: The Role of Concur-Counter Patterns.” Pragmatics26 (1): 1–19. 10.1075/prag.26.1.01bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.1.01bre [Google Scholar]
  4. Basanta, Almudena, and Lieve Vangehuchten
    2019 “Las cartas de presentación en los informes de RSC en Chile, España y México” [“Introductory letters in CSR Reports in Chile, Spain and Mexico”]. Revista Ibérica38: 99–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Geppert, Mike
    2003 “Sensemaking and Politics in MNCs: A Comparative Analysis of Vocabularies within the Global Manufacturing Discourse in One Industrial Sector.” Journal of Management Inquiry12: 312–329. 10.1177/1056492603259058
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603259058 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gergen, Kenneth, Mary Gergen, and Frank Barrett
    2004 “Dialogue: Life and Death of the Organization.” InHandbook of Organizational Discourse, ed. byDavid Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick, and Linda Putnam, 39–60. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608122.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Giannarakis, Grigoris, and Ioannis Theotokas
    2011 “The Effect of Financial Crisis in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance.” International Journal of Marketing Studies3 (1): 2–10. 10.5539/ijms.v3n1p2
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v3n1p2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Habermas, Jürgen
    1973Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hargie, Owen, Karyn Stapleton, and Dennis Tourish
    2010 “Interpretations of CEO Public Apologies for the Banking Crisis: Attributions of Blame and Avoidance of Responsibility.” Organization17 (6): 721–742. 10.1177/1350508410367840
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410367840 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hellín García, María José
    2013 “Legitimization and Delegitimization Strategies on Terrorism: A Corpus Based Analysis on Building Metaphors.” Pragmatics23 (2): 301–330. 10.1075/prag.23.2.05hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.2.05hel [Google Scholar]
  12. Kostova, Tatiana, and Srilata Zaheer
    1999 “Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review24: 64–81. 10.5465/amr.1999.1580441
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kress, Gunter, and Theo van Leeuwen
    1996Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Musolff, Andreas
    2016Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Orts, María Ángeles
    2016 “Power Distance and Persuasion: The Tension between Imposition and Legitimation in International Legal Genres.” Journal of Pragmatics92: 1–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Palazzo, Guido, and Andreas Georg Scherer
    2006 “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics66: 71–88. 10.1007/s10551‑006‑9044‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Poblete, Claudia
    2011 “Legitimation Strategies of the Deputies’ Discourse on the Constitutional Impeachment against the Education Minister of Chile.” Revista Signos44 (76): 168–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2016 “The Discourse Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.), ed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2017 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” InRoutledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-4 [Google Scholar]
  20. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse and Society22 (6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  21. Suchman, M.
    (1995) “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review20 (3): 571–610. 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar]
  22. Vaara, Eero and Tienari, Janne
    (2008) “A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in MNCs.” Academy of Management Review33: 985–93. 10.5465/amr.2008.34422019
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422019 [Google Scholar]
  23. Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
    2006 “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies27: 789–810. 10.1177/0170840606061071
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061071 [Google Scholar]
  24. van Dijk, Teun
    1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Dijk, Teun, and Luisa Martín Rojo
    1997 “‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society8: 523–566. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  26. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication1(1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  27. van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Perspective.” Discourse Studies1: 83–118. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael
    2017Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zelditch, Morris
    2001 “Theories of Legitimacy.” InThe Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, ed. byJohn Jost and Brenda Major, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20065.bre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.20065.bre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error