oa The son (érzi) is not really a son

References

1. Afful, J. B. Archibald
   2006 “Address Terms among University Students in Ghana: A Case Study.” Language and Intercultural Communication6 (1): 76–91. 10.1080/14708470608668909
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470608668909 [Google Scholar]
2. Afful, J. B. Archibald
   2010 “Address Forms among University Students in Ghana: A Case of Gendered Identities?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development31 (5): 443–456. 10.1080/01434632.2010.505655
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.505655 [Google Scholar]
3. Alenizi, Aied
   2019 “The Norms of Address Terms in Arabic: The Case of Saudi Speech Community.” International Journal of English Linguistics9 (5): 227–241. 10.5539/ijel.v9n5p227
   https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p227 [Google Scholar]
4. Anchimbe, Eric
   2008 “‘Come Greet Uncle Eric’ – Politeness Through Kinship Terms.” InDe La Politesse Linguistique au Cameroun [Linguistic Politeness in Cameroon], ed. byMulo F. Bernard, 109–120. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arundale, Robert B.
   2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (8): 2078–2105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
6. Bin Towairesh, Abdullah
   2012 “The Use of Term of Address in the City of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” Ph.D. diss., University of Queensland. Brisbane.
7. Braun, Friederike
   1988 Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110848113
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848113 [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford
   1961 “Address in American English.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology62 (2): 375–385. 10.1037/h0042862
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042862 [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
   1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” InStyle in Language, ed. byThomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
    1989 “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies.” Language in Society18 (2): 159–212. 10.1017/S0047404500013464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013464 [Google Scholar]
11. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
12. Cao, Xianghong
    2007 “The Effect of Age and Gender on the Choice of Address Forms in Chinese Personal Letters.” Journal of Sociolinguistics11 (3): 392–407. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00329.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00329.x [Google Scholar]
13. Carstarphen, Meta G., and Jacqueline Johnson Lambiase
    1998 “Domination and Democracy in Cyberspace: Reports from the Majority Media and Ethnic/Gender Margins.” InCyberghetto or Cybertopia?: Race, Class, and Gender on the Internet, ed. byBosah Ebo, 121–136. Westport & London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Che, Yuejiao 车越娇
    2019 “Jiyu shehui yuyan xue de nvxing fensi yanyu shequ yanjiu基于社会语言学的女性粉丝言语社区研究 [Research on the Speech Community of Female Fans Based on Sociolinguistics].” M.A. thesis, Bohai daxue渤海大学 [Bohai University].
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chen, Jing 陈静
    2018 “Fudao yuan qinshu lei shenfen dingwei xianxiang yu fenxi辅导员亲属类身份定位现象与分析 [Analysis of the University Counselor’s Kinship Identity Positioning].” Henan keji xueyuan xuebao河南科技学院学报 [Journal of Hennan Institute of Science and Technology] (1): 100–104.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chen, Qin, and Yang Xuming 陈琴, 杨绪明
    2015 “‘Ge/jie’ deng qinshu chengwei zicheng yi fanhua yanjiu‘哥/姐’等亲属称谓自称义泛化研究 [On the Generalization of the Self-addressed Kinship Terms ‘Ge/Jie’].” Guangxi shifan xueyuan xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban)广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition)] 36 (1): 128–131.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chen, Songcen 陈松岑
    1984 “Beijing chengqu liangdairen dui shang yi bei qinshu shiyong qinshu chengwei de bianhua北京城区两代人对上一辈亲属使用亲属称谓的变化 [The Changes of Using Kinship Terms to Address Non-kins from the Previous Generation in Beijing Downtown].” Yuwen Yanjiu语文研究 [Linguist Research] 21: 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chen, Xinren
    2019 “‘You’re a Nuisance!’: ‘Patch-up’ Jocular Abuse in Chinese Fiction.” Journal of Pragmatics1391: 52–63. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.015 [Google Scholar]
19. Chen, Xinren
    2022 Exploring Identity Work in Chinese Communication. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350169357
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350169357 [Google Scholar]
20. Chen, Xinren, and Juanjuan Ren
    2020 “A Memetic Cultural Practice: The Use of Generalized Kinship Terms in a Research Seminar Attended by Chinese Graduate Students.” Lingua2451: 1–11. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102942
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102942 [Google Scholar]
21. Clayman, Steven E.
    2018 “Address Terms in the Organization of Turns at Talk: The Case of Pivotal Turn Extensions.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1853–1867. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Cong, Li, and Li Linin 丛丽, 李琳琳
    2013 “Yujing shunying lilun shijiao xia qinshu chengweiyu de fanhua fanyi yanjiu语境顺应理论视角下亲属称谓语的泛化翻译研究 [A Study on Translation of Extended Kinship Terms under the Framework of Context Adaptability Theory].” Jinlin huagong xueyuan xuebao吉林化工学院学报 [Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology] (10): 28–31.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Crozier, W. Ray, and Patricia S. Dimmock
    1999 “Name-calling and Nicknames in a Sample of Primary School Children.” British Journal of Educational Psychology691: 505–516. 10.1348/000709999157860
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157860 [Google Scholar]
24. De Klerk, Vivian, and Barbara Bosch
    1999 “Nicknames as Evidence of Verbal Playfulness.” Multilingua18 (1): 1–16. 10.1515/mult.1999.18.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1999.18.1.1 [Google Scholar]
25. Dickey, Eleanor
    1997 “Forms of Address and Terms of Reference.” Journal of Linguistics331: 255–274. 10.1017/S0022226797006488
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006488 [Google Scholar]
26. Dickey, Eleanor
    2004 “Literal and Extended Use of Kinship Terms in Documentary Papyri.” Mnemosyne57 (2): 131–176. 10.1163/156852504773399169
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156852504773399169 [Google Scholar]
27. Dornyo, Philip
    2010 “Nicknaming Practices among University Students: A Case Study of the University of Cape Coast.” B.A. thesis, University of Cape Coast.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Du, Xuan 杜璇
    2017 “Xiandai hanyu qinshu chengwei de fanhua tanjiu现代汉语亲属称谓的泛化探究 [A Study on the Modern Chinese Kinship Terms Generalization].” Xiandai yuwen现代语文 [Modern Chinese] (3): 119–122.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fitch, Kristine L.
    1991 “The Interplay of Linguistic Universals and Cultural Knowledge in Personal Address: Columbian Madre Terms.” Comunication Monographs581: 254–272. 10.1080/03637759109376229
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759109376229 [Google Scholar]
30. Fleming, Luke, and James Slotta
    2018 “The Pragmatics of Kin Address: A Sociolinguistic Universal and Its Semantic Affordances.” Journal of Sociolinguistics22 (4): 375–405. 10.1111/josl.12304
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12304 [Google Scholar]
31. Fox, Annie B., Danuta Bukatko, Mark Hallahan, and Mary Crawford
    2007 “The Medium Makes a Difference Gender Similarities and Differences in Instant Messaging.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology26 (4): 389–397. 10.1177/0261927X07306982
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07306982 [Google Scholar]
32. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics141: 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
33. Hampel, Elisabeth
    2015 “‘Mama Zimbi, Pls Help Me!’ – Gender Differences in (Im)politeness in Ghanaian English Advice-giving on Facebook.” Journal of Politeness Research11 (1): 99–130. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
34. Hentschel, Elke
    2013 “All Men Become Brothers: The Use of Kinship Terms for Non-related Persons as a Sign of Respect or Disrespect.” Linguistik Online511: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jakobson, Roman
    1960 “Linguistic and Poetics.” InStyle in Language, ed. byThomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ju, Zhucheng
    1991 “The ‘Depreciation’ and ‘Appreciation’ of Some Address Terms in China.” Language in Society201: 387–390. 10.1017/S0047404500016547
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016547 [Google Scholar]
37. Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
    2018 “Address Inversion in Swahili: Usage Patterns, Cognitive Motivation and Cultural Factors.” Cognitive Linguistics29 (3): 545–583. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0129 [Google Scholar]
38. Kueh, Joshua
    2013 “Adaptive Strategies of Parian Chinese Fictive Kinship and Credit in Seventeenth-century Manila.” Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints61 (3): 362–384. 10.1353/phs.2013.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2013.0013 [Google Scholar]
39. Lee, Heeju, Danjie Su, and Hongyin Tao
    2017 “A Crosslinguistic Study of Some Extended Uses of What-based Interrogative Expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean.” Chinese Language and Discourse8 (2): 137–173. 10.1075/cld.00001.lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00001.lee [Google Scholar]
40. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
41. Li, Jin
    2018 “Digital Affordances on WeChat: Learning Chinese as a Second Language.” Computer Assisted Language Learning31 (1–2): 27–52. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1376687
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1376687 [Google Scholar]
42. Liu, Yonghou
    2009 “Determinants of Stall-holders’ Address Forms to Customers in Beijing’s Low-status Clothing Markets.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 638–648. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.07.002 [Google Scholar]
43. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Maalej, Zouhair
    2010 “Addressing Non-acquaintances in Tunisian Arabic: A Cognitive Pragmatic Account.” Intercultural Pragmatics7 (1): 147–173. 10.1515/iprg.2010.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.007 [Google Scholar]
45. Martiny, Thierry
    1996 “Forms of Address in French and Dutch: A Sociopragmatic Approach.” Language Sciences18 (3–4): 365–375. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(96)00046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00046-0 [Google Scholar]
46. Mavunga, George, John Mutambwa, and Partson Kutsaru
    2014 “‘Iwe’ or ‘imi’? An Analysis of Terms of Address Used by Police Officers at Mbare Police Station.” Language Matters45 (1): 148–161. 10.1080/10228195.2013.872694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2013.872694 [Google Scholar]
47. McCarthy, John
    2008 Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444301182
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301182 [Google Scholar]
48. Miller, Jennifer
    2000 “Language Use, Identity and Social Interaction: Migrant Students in Australia.” Research on Language and Social Interaction33 (1): 69–100. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_3 [Google Scholar]
49. Mühlhaüsler, Peter, and Rom Harré
    1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nakassis, Constantine V.
    2014 “Suspended Kinship and Youth Sociality in Tamil Nadu, India.” Current Anthropology55 (2): 175–199. 10.1086/675246
    https://doi.org/10.1086/675246 [Google Scholar]
51. Obeng, Samuel Gyasi
    1999 “Requests in Akan Discourse.” Anthropological Linguistics41 (2): 230–251.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Pan, Pan 潘攀
    1998 “Lun qinshu chengwei yu de fanhua论亲属称谓语的泛化 [On Kinship Term Generalization].” Yuyan wenzi yingyong语言文字应用 [Applied Linguistics] (2): 34–38.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svatrvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ren, Juanjuan, and Xinren Chen
    2019 “Kinship Term Generalization as a Cultural Pragmatic Strategy among Chinese Graduate Students.” Pragmatics and Society10 (4): 613–638. 10.1075/ps.18009.ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18009.ren [Google Scholar]
55. Rendle-Short, Johanna
    2007 “‘Catherine, You’re Wasting Your Time’: Address Terms within the Australian Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics391: 1503–1525. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006 [Google Scholar]
56. Sandel, Todd L.
    2002 “Kinship Address: Socializing Young Children in Taiwan.” Western Journal of Communication66 (8): 257–280. 10.1080/10570310209374737
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374737 [Google Scholar]
57. Sandel, Todd L., Chuyue Ou, Dorji Wangchuk, Bei Ju, and Miguel Duque
    2019 “Unpacking and Describing Interaction on Chinese WeChat: A Methodological Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics1431: 228–241. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011 [Google Scholar]
58. Spencer-Oteay, Helen
    2000 Culturally Speaking Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Taylor, Charlotte
    2016 Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.267
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.267 [Google Scholar]
60. Thomas, Jenny A.
    1995 Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language571: 33–65. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
62. Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid
    1996 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wang, Na 王娜
    2006 “Xiandai hanyu qinshu chengwei yu de fan hua yanjiu现代汉语亲属称谓语的泛化研究 [A Study on the Modern Chinese Kinship Term Generalization].” M. A. Thesis, Qufu shifan daxue曲阜师范大学 [Qufu Normal University].
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wardhaugh, Ronald
    1986 An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wong, Andrew D.
    2008 “The Trouble with Tongzhi: The Politics of Labeling among Gay and Lesbian Hongkongers.” Pragmatics18 (2): 277–301.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Yang, Kun
    2021 “Disclaimer as a Metapragmatic Device in Chinese: A Corpus Based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics1731: 167–176. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.011 [Google Scholar]
67. You, Chenghong
    2014 “Analysis on the Generalization of the Address Term “Teacher” in Chinese from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies4 (3): 575–580. 10.4304/tpls.4.3.575‑580
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.3.575-580 [Google Scholar]
68. Yueh, Hsin-I.
    2017 Identity Politics and Popular Culture in Taiwan: A Sajiao Generation. London: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Yule, George
    2006 The Study of Language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Yus, Francisco
    2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
71. Zhang, Jie, and Ma Yikun 张杰, 马一琨
    2021 “Yujing bengkui: Pingtai ke gong xing haishi xin shehui qingjing? – Gainian suyuan yu lilun jifa语境崩溃：平台可供性还是新社会情境—概念溯源与理论激发 [Context Collapse: Platform Availability or New Social Context?: Concept tracing and theoretical inspiration]” Xinwen jizhe新闻记者 [Shanghai Journalism Review] (2): 27–38.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zhao, Qi, and Xu Xiaohong 赵琪, 徐晓红
    2009 “Shanghai hua he dongbei hua qinshu chenghu yu fan hua bu junheng xianxiang yanjiu上海话和东北话亲属称呼语泛化不均衡现象研究 [A Case Study on Unbalanced Fictive Use of Kinship Terms in Northeastern Dialect and Shanghai Dialect].” Jilin shifan daxue xuebao(renwen shehui kexue ban)吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) [Jilin Normal University Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)] (1): 54–56.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zhou, Lei 周雷
    2019 “Wangluo liuxing yu ‘X ya’ weitan网络流行语‘X鸭’微探 [An Exploration of the Internet Buzzword ‘X ya (duck)’].” Hanzi wenhua汉字文化 [Chinese Character Culture] 131: 103–106.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Zhu, Hua
    2010 “Language Socialization and Interculturality: Address Terms in Intergenerational Talk in Chinese Diasporic Families.” Language and Intercultural Communication10 (3): 189–205. 10.1080/14708470903348531
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470903348531 [Google Scholar]