oa Examining the rhetorical structure and discursive features of letters of leniency as a genre

References

1. Anthony, M. , and K. Gladkov
   (2007) Rhetorical appeals in fundraising. In D. Biber , U. Connor & T.A. Upton (eds.), Discourse on the move using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 121-51. doi: 10.1075/scl.28.07ant
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.07ant [Google Scholar]
2. Arundale, R.B
   (1999) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics9.1: 119-53.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arundale, R.B
   (2006) Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research in face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research2: 193-216.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Abelen, E. , G. Redeker , and S.A. Thompson
   (1993) The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13.3: 323-50.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bargiela-Chiappini, F
   (2003) Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics35: 1453-69. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00173‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X [Google Scholar]
6. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. , and S.J. Harris
   (1996) Requests and status in business correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics28: 635-62. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(96)89191‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)89191-0 [Google Scholar]
7. Bazerman, C
   (1989) Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bhatia, V.K
   (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bhatia, V.K
   (1998) Generic patterns in fundraising discourse. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising22: 95-110. doi: 10.1002/pf.2207
   https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.2207 [Google Scholar]
10. Bhatia, V.K
    (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Biber, D
    (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
12. Biber, D. , U. Connor , and T.A. Upton
    (2007) Discourse on the Move Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
13. Brown, P. , and S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bruder, K.A
    (1998) A pragmatics for human relationships with the divine: An examination of the monastic blessing sequence. Journal of Pragmatics29: 463-91. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00062‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00062-3 [Google Scholar]
15. Chakorn, O
    (2006) Persuasive and politeness strategies in cross-cultural letters of request in the Thai business context. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication16.1: 106-46. doi: 10.1075/japc.16.1.06cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.16.1.06cha [Google Scholar]
16. Christie, C
    (2004) Introduction. Multilingual 23.1: 1-11. doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.006 [Google Scholar]
17. Conley, J.M. , and W. O’Barr
    (1998) Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Connor, U. , and T.A. Upton
    (2003) Linguistic dimensions of direct mail letters. In C. Meyer & P. Leistyna (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 71-87.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eckert, P. , and S. McConnell-Ginet
    (1992) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
20. Goffman, E
    (1967) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 5-45.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Grice, H.P
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gu, Y
    (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14: 237-57. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
23. Haugh, M
    (2003) Anticipated versus inferred politeness. Multilingua22: 397-413. doi: 10.1515/mult.2003.020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.020 [Google Scholar]
24. Haugh, M
    (2005) The importance of 'place' in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses. Intercultural Pragmatics2.1: 41-68. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41 [Google Scholar]
25. Hurd, H.M
    (2007) The morality of mercy. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4: 388-421.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ide, S
    (1989) Formal forms of discernment: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua8: 223-48. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
27. Ji, S
    (2000) 'Face' and polite verbal behaviors in Chinese culture. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1059-62. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00068‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00068-5 [Google Scholar]
28. de Kadt, E
    (1998) The concept of face and it's applicability in the Zulu language. Journal of Pragmatics29: 173-91. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00021‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00021-0 [Google Scholar]
29. Kanoksilapatham, B
    (2007) Introduction to move analysis. In D. Biber , U. Connor , & T.A. Upton (eds.), Discourse on the Move Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 23-41. doi: 10.1075/scl.28.04kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.04kan [Google Scholar]
30. Kasper, G
    (1990) Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics14: 193-218. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90080‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W [Google Scholar]
31. Mao, L.R
    (1994) Beyond politeness theory: 'Face' revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics21: 451-86. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
32. Mills, S
    (2004) Class, gender and politeness. Multilingua23: 171-90. doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.004 [Google Scholar]
33. Sato, S
    (2008) Use of “please” in American and New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1249-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.001 [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff, E
    (1990) The organization of sequences as a source of coherence in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 51-77.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Swales, J.M
    (1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. Aston University: Language Studies Unit.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Swales, J.M
    (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Torre, L. , and M.A. Bendixen
    (1988) Direct Mail Fund Raising: Letters that Work. New York: Plenum Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑3799‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3799-5 [Google Scholar]
38. Upton, T.A
    (2002) Understanding direct mail letters as a genre. Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7.1: 65-85. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.7.1.04upt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.1.04upt [Google Scholar]