1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper presents a genre analysis of 73 letters of leniency, which were obtained in two United States federal district courthouses. The primary objective of this type of genre is to persuade a judge to be lenient during the sentencing of a defendant, such as by reducing or commuting the defendant’s sentence. This paper examines how writers of this genre structure their letters and use discursive features, in particular linguistically-realized politeness and appeals to the judges’ faith, to make a request for leniency. The findings of this study show that the rhetorical and discursive features of letters of leniency follow the conventions of the court, which demands the observance of the judge’s face through the use of politeness. This study also shows how the notion of faith is exploited in this type of genre to make a persuasive request or, more often, to follow-up a request (post-request) for leniency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.1.06mas
2011-01-01
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, M. , and K. Gladkov
    (2007) Rhetorical appeals in fundraising. In D. Biber , U. Connor & T.A. Upton (eds.), Discourse on the move using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 121-51. doi: 10.1075/scl.28.07ant
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.07ant [Google Scholar]
  2. Arundale, R.B
    (1999) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics9.1: 119-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2006) Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research in face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research2: 193-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Abelen, E. , G. Redeker , and S.A. Thompson
    (1993) The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13.3: 323-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bargiela-Chiappini, F
    (2003) Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics35: 1453-69. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00173‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X [Google Scholar]
  6. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. , and S.J. Harris
    (1996) Requests and status in business correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics28: 635-62. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(96)89191‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)89191-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazerman, C
    (1989) Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhatia, V.K
    (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1998) Generic patterns in fundraising discourse. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising22: 95-110. doi: 10.1002/pf.2207
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.2207 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, D
    (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  12. Biber, D. , U. Connor , and T.A. Upton
    (2007) Discourse on the Move Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, P. , and S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bruder, K.A
    (1998) A pragmatics for human relationships with the divine: An examination of the monastic blessing sequence. Journal of Pragmatics29: 463-91. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00062‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00062-3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chakorn, O
    (2006) Persuasive and politeness strategies in cross-cultural letters of request in the Thai business context. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication16.1: 106-46. doi: 10.1075/japc.16.1.06cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.16.1.06cha [Google Scholar]
  16. Christie, C
    (2004) Introduction. Multilingual 23.1: 1-11. doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Conley, J.M. , and W. O’Barr
    (1998) Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Connor, U. , and T.A. Upton
    (2003) Linguistic dimensions of direct mail letters. In C. Meyer & P. Leistyna (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 71-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckert, P. , and S. McConnell-Ginet
    (1992) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, E
    (1967) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 5-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Grice, H.P
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gu, Y
    (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14: 237-57. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  23. Haugh, M
    (2003) Anticipated versus inferred politeness. Multilingua22: 397-413. doi: 10.1515/mult.2003.020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.020 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2005) The importance of 'place' in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses. Intercultural Pragmatics2.1: 41-68. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hurd, H.M
    (2007) The morality of mercy. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4: 388-421.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ide, S
    (1989) Formal forms of discernment: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua8: 223-48. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ji, S
    (2000) 'Face' and polite verbal behaviors in Chinese culture. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1059-62. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00068‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00068-5 [Google Scholar]
  28. de Kadt, E
    (1998) The concept of face and it's applicability in the Zulu language. Journal of Pragmatics29: 173-91. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00021‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00021-0 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kanoksilapatham, B
    (2007) Introduction to move analysis. In D. Biber , U. Connor , & T.A. Upton (eds.), Discourse on the Move Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 23-41. doi: 10.1075/scl.28.04kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.04kan [Google Scholar]
  30. Kasper, G
    (1990) Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics14: 193-218. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90080‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W [Google Scholar]
  31. Mao, L.R
    (1994) Beyond politeness theory: 'Face' revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics21: 451-86. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mills, S
    (2004) Class, gender and politeness. Multilingua23: 171-90. doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sato, S
    (2008) Use of “please” in American and New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1249-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, E
    (1990) The organization of sequences as a source of coherence in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 51-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Swales, J.M
    (1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. Aston University: Language Studies Unit.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Torre, L. , and M.A. Bendixen
    (1988) Direct Mail Fund Raising: Letters that Work. New York: Plenum Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑3799‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3799-5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Upton, T.A
    (2002) Understanding direct mail letters as a genre. Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7.1: 65-85. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.7.1.04upt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.1.04upt [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.1.06mas
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Discourse analysis , Forensic linguistics , Genre analysis , Letters of leniency and Politeness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error