1887
Reframing framing
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This special issue revisits the notion of framing based on several recent developments in the fields of sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and linguistic anthropology, particularly the current interest in the notions of stance, style, metalinguistics and language ideology. In doing so, the contributions highlight the importance of framing not only in the management of micro-level interactional practices but also in the reproduction of cultural ideologies and social relations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.01par
2011-01-01
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson, Gregory
    (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. InSteps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 177-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Richard
    (1977) Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2004) A world of others' words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Malden: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470773895
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773895 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, Richard , and Charles L. Briggs
    (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  6. Briggs, Charles L. , and Richard Bauman
    (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2.2: 131-172. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bucholtz, Mary , and Kira Hall
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7: 585-614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  8. Du Bois, John W
    (2001) Towards a dialogic syntax. Ms., University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckert, Penelope
    (2004) The meaning of style. In Wai Fong Chiang , Elaine Chun , Laura Mahalingappa , and Siri Mehus , (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin. Texas Linguistic ForumVol. 47: 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12: 453-476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Eckert, Penelope , and John R. Rickford
    (eds.) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Englebretson, Robert
    (ed.) (2007) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gal, Susan , and Kathryn A. Woolard
    (eds.) (2001) Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon, Cynthia
    (2002) “I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie”: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother–child discourse. Language in Society31: 679–720. doi: 10.1017/S004740450231501X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450231501X [Google Scholar]
  18. (2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society37: 319-349. doi: 10.1017/S0047404508080536
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080536 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gumperz, John J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1996) The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374-406.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2001) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen , and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 215–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill, Jane H
    (2001) Mock Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. In Susan Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.), Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome, pp. 83-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hill, Jane H. , and Judith T. Irvine
    (eds.) (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan , and Geoff Thompson
    (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaffe, Alexandra
    (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaworski, Adam , Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasiński
    (eds.) (2004) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kroskrity, Paul V
    (ed.) (2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2004) Language ideologies. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 496-517.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lempert, Michael
    (2008) The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society37: 569-592. doi: 10.1017/S0047404508080779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080779 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lucy, John A
    (ed.) (1993) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 [Google Scholar]
  31. Oropeza-Escobar, M
    (2011) Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.204
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.204 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rampton, Ben
    (ed.) (1999) Styling the other. Special issue ofJournal of Sociolinguistics 3.4. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00088
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00088 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schieffelin, Bambi B. , Kathryn A. Woolard , and Paul V. Kroskrity
    (eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Silverstein, Michael
    (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne , William F. Hanks , and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 193-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 219-259.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Silverstein, Michael , and Greg Urban
    (eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tannen, Deborah
    (ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2004) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction37: 399–420. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2006) Intertextuality in action: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk26: 597–617. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.024 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tannen, Deborah , and Cynthia Wallat
    (1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50.2: 205-216. doi: 10.2307/2786752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786752 [Google Scholar]
  41. Woolard, Kathryn A
    (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin , Kathryn A. Woolard , and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-47.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.01par
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Framing , Interaction , Language ideology , Stance and Style
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error