1887
Reframing framing
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Studies on language and affect have identified displays of emotions and feelings as important means through which speakers negotiate their social relations and cultural positions. Extending the findings of those studies, this paper discusses how affect must be seen as an important building block for framing, a resource that allows participants to construct frames that have specific grounding in identifiable social meaning. I make this point by illustrating how interactional management of affect contributes to the constitution of frames via the work of stancetaking, based on a discussion of several examples from a specific discursive context - Koreans’ metalinguistic talk about English. While Koreans are commonly known to show much ‘anxiety’ or ‘uneasiness’ about their own English language skills, I demonstrate that such display of affect may be understood as part of an interactional frame for speaking (about) English that allows speakers to position themselves in relation to English and to each other in a culturally and socially appropriate way. The analysis shows that the semiotic resources that speakers employ in their affective displays allow participants to negotiate specific stances that they should take, and to jointly construct a frame for interpreting the interactional import of the ongoing talk.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.05par
2011-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    (2007) Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson, Gregory
    (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. InSteps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 177-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Besnier, Niko
    (1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 419-451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chin, Cheongsook
    (2002) Native English-speaking teachers’ perception of learning and teaching EFL in Korea. Yeongeo Gyoyuk [English Teaching] 57.2: 113-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Du Bois, John W. , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cumming , and Danae Paolino
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Englebretson, Robert
    (ed.) (2007) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffman, Erving
    (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, Charles
    (2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society18.1: 53-73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill, Jane H. , and Judith T. Irvine
    (eds.) (1992) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Horwitz, Elaine K. , Michael B. Horwitz , and Jo Ann Cope
    (1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal70: 125-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05256.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunston, Susan , and Geoff Thompson
    (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaffe, Alexandra
    (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jang, Jong-Duk
    (2003) Relationship between student anxiety and corrective feedback: Case of Korean college-level EFL learners. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
  15. Kim, Joohae
    (2002) Anxiety and foreign language listening. Yeongeo Gyoyuk [English Teaching] 57.2: 3-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Seung Jung
    (2004) Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
  17. Kulick, Don , and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    (2004) Language socialization. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 349-368.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lutz, Catherine , and Lila Abu-Lughod
    (eds.) (1990) Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lutz, Catherine , and G. White
    (1986) The anthropology of emotions. Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 405-436. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.002201
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.002201 [Google Scholar]
  20. MacIntyre, Peter D. , Richard Clément , Zoltán Dörnyei , and Kimberly A. Noels
    (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82.4: 545-562. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb05543.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Ochs, Elinor , and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    (1989) Language has a heart. Text 9.1: 7-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Park, Gi-pyo
    (1995) Language learning strategies and beliefs about language learning of university students learning English in Korea. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
  23. Park, Joseph Sung-Yul
    (2009) The Local Construction of a Global Language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214079 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1978) Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 79-112. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tannen, Deborah , and Cynthia Wallat
    (1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50.2: 205-216. doi: 10.2307/2786752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786752 [Google Scholar]
  28. Truitt, Susan N
    (1995) Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: A study of Korean university students learning English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.05par
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Affect , English , Framing , Korean , Language ideology and Stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error